The Fashoda Incident, also known as Fashoda Crisis, was the climax of a dispute between France and Britain, who were vying for territory in Africa, and both claimed control over a Sudanese outpost. At the end of the nineteenth century, the European powers were competing for control of Africa, hoping to extend their territory into the Sudan and the Great Lakes region. As the French extended eastward from the Congo, the British expanded south from Egypt. The disputes arose from the common desire of each country to link up its disparate colonial possessions in Africa. Great Britain’s aim was to link Uganda to Egypt via a railway from the Cape of Good Hope to Cairo, while France, by pushing eastward from the west coast, hoped to extend its dominion across Central Africa and the Sudan.
In July 1898, a French expedition arrived at the Sudanese outpost of Fashoda on the Nile. After British General Herbert Kitchener's victory at Omdurman, he proceeded to Fashoda on orders from the British prime minister. Kitchener claimed the entire Nile valley for Great Britain, and, after several days, both parties withdrew peacefully. The solution to the conflicting claims was later worked out by diplomats in Britain and France, and it reflected the fact that Britain had an army in Khartoum, while France had no appreciable forces in the vicinity. France renounced all rights to the Nile basin and the Sudan in return for a guarantee of its position in West Africa. The Fashoda incident is seen as the high point of Anglo–French tension in Africa.
Berlin conference A conference held in Berlin, Germany in 1884 to 1885 in order to regulate the trade and European colonialism in Africa during the New Imperialism period. The conference was held following a request by Portugal and organized by Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of the German Empire.
During the 70s and 80s of the 19th century, the European powers were interested in Africa to get trades rights and access to the valuable resources, such as gold, timber, land markers and labor powers. The major competition was between the British, Portuguese, French and Belgians. The participant countries at the Conference were: Germany, Austria – Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, UK, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden – Norway and The Ottoman Empire. They wanted to work out policy for the division of Africa. The US was against the Berlin Conference because it didn’t want to be considered as a colonial power.
The main points achieved were:
- To end slavery and the slave trades.
- The Congo Free States came under King Leopold’s control (Belgium).
- All the European powers were given trade rights in the Congo Basin and other territories.
-The Niger River and Congo River were to be free for ship traffic.
- If any of the participants claimed a part of the African coast, they had to notify the other participant.
-The principle of Effectivity was one of the outcomes of the Berlin Conference. According to this principle each colonial power had to :
- have treaties with the local leader
- fly their flag
- establish an administration
-create a police force
As a consequences of the Berlin Conference “The scramble for Africa” speeded up.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In the years from 1880 to 1914, Europe’s attitude towards the acquisition of Africa’s land is that the Europeans were more advanced race and felt as if it was their right as Europeans to take the lands for themselves. This statement is supported by document 11, in which Martial Henri Merlin, the governor of French Equatorial of Africa’s speech in 1910. In this speech, Henri claims that it is the, “right of a civilized, fully developed race to occupy territories which have been left fallow by backward peoples who are plunged into barbarianism… What we exercised is a right.” This speech shows the attitude of the Europeans by saying that it is the European’s right to take that land from the uncivilized people of Africa. Henri clearly views Africa as the inferior race by calling the backwards and barbarians. He also justifies his actions by calling it a right of the Europeans to do this. Another example of Europe’s attitude toward Africans is exampled by document 6 George Washington Williams in his letter to Leopold II in 1890. In this letter, it says, “When he gave the black brother a cordial grasp of the hand, the black brother was surprised to find his white brother so strong that he…
- 1131 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Misrepresentation of Africa The 19th century was one of the most important time periods that helped shape the world into what it is today. Western European powers, such as Great Britain, Germany, and France, strongly believed in the notion that in order to gain more dominant global power, they would have to conquer new lands across the globe and exploit the territories’ resources. Throughout the early and mid 1800s, the nations of Western Europe upheld imperialism, conquering and exploiting foreign lands in Asia and South America. Unfortunately, one major problem remained in the way of global imperialism; Africa, a continent rich in resources, could not be infiltrated because of strong resistance by the natives, foreign disease, and difficult terrain. Nevertheless, in the 1880s, Western Europe became more advanced and had the capability of conquering Africa; the scramble for Africa was on. In 1884-85, the Berlin Conference was held in Germany; this was a diplomatic meeting where the nations of Western Europe divided Africa among themselves. Each nation was given separate holdings in Africa, and the issue of land in Africa was solved. However, a major problem overlooked by the Europeans was that Africa had no say in the Berlin Conference. This resulted in many problems that would terrorize Africa for years to come; because Africans had no say in the dividing of their land, religious and political strife arose, and places such as the Congo faced detrimental and uninvited changes.…
- 893 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A. The rise of new imperialism of the 19th and early 20th century involved Europe going into Africa. The causes of imperialism in Africa were partly due to the decolonization in America. The European powers were out political and economic gain by the United States gaining their independence. In 1876 European powers especially King Leopold II of Belgium, agreed in the Berlin Conference to split up the land in Africa, no longer invading to colonize but to gain political, military and economic power. The methods to imperialism of the African land were done differently, by each European power. The British who imperialized the cape of Africa used laws and indirect methods to gain power, however King Leopold II used extreme force to gain control of the Congo. The Congo was then ruled with strict political control and military force.…
- 808 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Each country wanted to be the most powerful, which included having a surplus of raw materials. For these raw materials countries mainly had to have colonies. Africa, being majority undiscovered and uncolonized, a prime area for imperialism. The Berlin conference was held to device Africa between the Europeans countries. Document A shows how Africa was divided, with only 2 independent countries left. Nationalism also played a part in the European imperialism in Africa. Citizens of these countries wanted more power from their country. Document B shows this for Britain when John Ruskin gave a lecture stating that “[England] must found colonies as fast and as far as she is able.”…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many Africans were afraid of European power, so they just gave in to the Scramble without a fight. In 1886, the British government commissioned the Royal Niger Company to administer and develop the Niger River delta. Many African rulers just signed their land away [doc. 1]. This document is official and provides no personal repost, so it is possible that the rulers did not give in entirely peacefully, all we know is that they gave in. A personal record of the Niger River delta dealing would help immensely to tell how easily the rulers signed. Ashanti leader Prempeh turned down a British offer of protectorate status, but he said that the Ashanti would always remain friendly with all white men [doc. 2]. Ndansi Kumalo, an African veteran of the Ndebele Rebellion tells how at first his people surrendered to the British and tried to continue living their lives as they always had [doc. 4]. Samuel Maharero, a Herero leader, wrote to another African leader about how the Herero people were trying to be obedient and patient with the Germans [doc. 7]. Many people in Africa just gave i to the changes occurring all around them.…
- 659 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When the Europeans scrambled to colonize Africa, the reactions of the natives was progressively more apprehensive. At first the natives found that they could be peaceful with this strange new white man. Soon after, though, they found that these new men mistreated and cheated them greatly, and had superior military technology. Given these new conditions of the relationship the Africans decided it was in their best interest to take up arms against the Europeans and try to rid themselves of the harmful White Man.…
- 759 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Out of those reason there were some European nations that believed would gain a political advantage by taking territories in Africa. Prince Leopold, future king of Belgium, during a conversation…
- 803 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Strategic concerns seem to have held heavier weight during this period. By 1875 competitive rivalry was at its peak. European powers fought for prestige and to protect the power of their empires. 90% of Africa was European owned by 1900. Pakenham supports my view stating ‘the scramble was forced upon Britain by her rivals’. This suggests that Britain was left with no other option but to expand to ensure she upheld her title as the most powerful empire in the world. More importantly, strategically, Africa had become vital to Britain due to the Suez Canal as it…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Cause of Scramble for Africa: There were several factors which The Berlin Conference was in 1884-1885, marked the start of the European competition for territory in Africa, it was called the scramble for africa. In meetings, Great Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, and King Leopold II divided their claims to African territory. During the conference the leaders also agreed to allow free trade among the colonies and made a system for negotiating future European claims in Africa. They did not provided any say for the peoples of Africa over the partitioning of their homelands.…
- 794 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
nineteenth century. 3. Analyze the policies of three European colonial powers regarding Africa between 1871 and 1914.…
- 760 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Ethiopian painting of the Battle of Adowa in 1896 where Ethiopians were victorious over Italian troops is also not clear on why the Ethiopians fought back (doc.5). Another document on why the Ethiopians fought back so vigorously would be more helpful. In a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed on the Congo River in 1877, Mojimba, an Africna chief, describes how the British had overcame Africans with guns n a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed one of his men everyday and it is obvious that change ropean intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason why these Africans gave in would reveal if they saw the European threat as a to their…
- 850 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many nations in Africa wanted to cooperate with the British and react to their wants peacefully. This is the reason why the Africans gave up hope and accepted the European ways to the scramble. Based on document one, in 1886, the British government sent the Royal Niger Company to help develop the Niger River and its surrounding areas. Due to the lost hope, many leaders signed the document and gave their land away. Because this document is an official document, it is not possible to have a personal influence, changing the view of this document askew. In document eight, it shows how a German military officer reports to a…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Once in the early 1880’s, King Leopold of Belgium was the first to colonize, or own, a private country in central Africa known as the Congo Free State, kicking off European imperialism. However, the way he managed and took over that region was controversial among European leaders such as Otto von Bismarck, who as a result of King Leopold’s actions, proposed for a conference to be held regarding the standards for claiming land. This conference was known as the Berlin Conference of 1884. From this event, multiple standards and regulations were created, one of those including the rule of occupation which stated that a nation or country had to have treaty agreements, buildings, soldiers, and administrators on the ground to support its’ claim. Additive…
- 952 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
During the 1700s, there was a massive movement for the colonization of Africa among European powers. France, The Dutch, Britain, and Portugal all attempted to carve Africa into colonial possessions to capture the diamonds and other raw resources available across the massive continent. However, both the Spanish and Russian empires did not take part in this mad dash…
- 550 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the Berlin Conference all the participants signed a notion that said they could not have colonies unless they have full control of the territory they encompassed. The European powers had to send expeditionary forces to pacify what were called their African “spheres of influence.” This process was bloody and ugly due to the amount of Africans fighting back. These pacifications lasted all the way up to World War 1. These uprisings caused anarchy in some places in Africa. Only Ethiopia successfully kept their freedom militarily. But all across Africa, hundreds of polities large, and small fought to destroy these superimposed boundaries.…
- 390 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays