Students of history and those merely interested in casual inquiry will often explore a topic, find a legitimate opinion, accept it at face value, and move on. Too often with young or inexperienced historians this is the case. It does, in a way, make sense. Many topics an individual will study have been researched and written on countless times. It is easy to accept an opinion as is and forget about it. John Brown is one of these subjects. Merrill D. Peterson’s John Brown explores the complicated nature of the legacy of this militant abolitionist. Brown has been, in the time since his departure, construed as a hero, a villain, an antihero, a well-meaning lunatic, and so on. The nature of his actions and the divisive context they are found in gives way to many different opinions. Peterson’s book explores these many definitions of John Brown. The opinions of historians, students, politicians, and the like are weighed against the validity of their status as historical interpreters, their knowledge of the subject, their biases, and Peterson’s own interpretations. John Brown’s legacy is an ambiguous and complicated one and Peterson’s book explores the warring opinions of observers on whether John Brown is hero, villain, or both.…
John Brown is famous for his attack on Harpers Ferry. Abraham Lincoln had called him a “misguided fanatic”. John Brown was a “misguided fanatic” only because he thought what he was doing what was right. Frederick Douglass writes in his last meeting with Brown, “It would be an attack upon the Federal government, and would turn the whole country against us.” Douglass knew that Brown would not make it out alive, yet he let him go. October 16, 1859, Brown and 21 other men attack Harpers Ferry. Within 36 hours all men are either captured or killed. On the day of his trial, he says, “I believe that to have done what I have done--on behalf of God’s despised poor was not wrong, but right.” He believed that in order to stop slavery he was to arm slaves…
Abraham Lincoln called John Brown a misguided fanatic! John Brown was not a misguided fanatic. John Brown tried his best to save the slaves from all the hard work and bring them to freedom, he just wanted slavery to end. Brown took a vow to end slavery when he found out that an abolitionist newspaperman was killed. He didn’t want anyone to harm the slaves, so he had a plan to save the slaves, he had a meeting with Frederick Douglass about the plan to save the slaves, so things wouldn't get out of hand, but Douglass opposed to his plan, Brown’s plan was to take over Harper’s Ferry, because Douglass knew that his plan would have failed and have also led to many black deaths, he thought that Brown would’ve hurt the abolition movement by causing…
However you may slice it, Brown’s actions were proved to be “the errors of a fanatic, not the crimes of a felon” in his self righteousness (Doc A). ‘Saint John’ Brown was sung of as often more than Jesus to both black slaves and abolitionists. To them, instead of murdering innocent…
John Brown held to the idea that non-free slaves had human rights and he had to be the one who would give them the right to be equal among all men. John Brown will always be famous for his Harpers Ferry Raid, and to some the start of the secession from the Union. So who really is John Brown? Is he a terrorist? I believe he is an anti-slavery activist and perhaps even an extreme abolitionist. I believe that even under the definition of a terrorist, a person who is a terrorist does not care about who he or she hurts or offends. The writer of the article commented on Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh as terrorist. They were tried with charges of: 8 counts of first-degree murder, Conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, Use of a weapon of mass destruction, and Destruction with the use of explosives.…
In Chapter 7 of After The Fact, Davidson and Lytle attempt to prove if John Brown was a sane or insane person. After Brown’s attack on Harpers Ferry, Brown was put on trial for treason. In that battle, Brown led a group of 21 men, 5 of whom were black slaves, to the port town of Harpers Ferry in an effort to unite against the controversial issue of slavery. His attack began when he took a few captives, including Lewis Washington, the first president’s grandson. Although it began well, he underestimated the people he was fighting and he was eventually beaten after President Buchanan sent reinforcements down to help end the battle. The reinforcement troops killed 10 of the people in his “army” and left the rest of them “scattered or captured” (149). The public consensus on Brown was divided as some people believed Brown was right in…
A life in which an equal was treated like a worthless being is what many called a “standard home”. Unfortunately, Brown and many others were exposed to this atrocious mindset. Despite these influences, John Brown became a warrior in the battle for freedom of African Americans. Brown had been born into the 1800’s on May 9 within Connecticut before the Brown family moved to Ohio. Because of Brown’s religious upbringing, slavery was an unacceptable norm John wished to fight against. As the use of enslaved African Americans expanded, so did John’s hatred for the popular institution of slavery, resulting in him planning attacks with volunteers. He committed himself to creating these attacks and successfully carried out 2 before being captured- the Pottawatomie Creek attack and Harpers Ferry raid. Many could argue why John Brown qualifies for being a terrorist, yet he undoubtedly created a pathway for…
Woodward argues that John Brwan is a fanatic who committed wholesale murder in Kansas in 1856 and whose ill-fated assault on Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in 1859 was an irrational act of treason against the United States. On the otherhand, Reynolds aruges that John Brown is a deeply religious, yet deeply flawed, humanitarian reformer who employed violent means in Kansas and in the raid at Harpers Ferry against pro-slavery outrages at a time when the United States had failed to live up to its most cherished ideal of human…
Between December of 1859 and March of 1860, relations between the North and the South weren't as hostile as they later became. Although both proponents and adversaries of John Brown's raid existed, the development of two varying extremes didn't evolve until later in 1860. "There are fit and unfit modes of combating a great evil" (Greeley, Doc. A). Horace Greeley expressed his resistance to slavery and his support of Brown's goal to abolish it as stated in his New York Tribune article in 1859. However, he was not a proponent of the "pernicious" ways Brown went about achieving his aspiration. On the other hand, the review in 1860 of James Redpath's The Public Life of Captain John Brown displays agreement with the way in which Brown went about attempting to achieve freedom for slaves, although he is not a proponent of Brown's objective to abolish slavery. "In representing John Brown as little more than a mere hero of the…
Do you think John Brown was a courageous abolitionist who died for a cause he believed in, or was he insane? Was he a martyr or a terrorist?…
Looking back in history, in the years leading up to the Civil War, many important events took place which defined the course of history and overall sparked the Civil War. John Brown was an abolitionist, born and raised in the North and with the conception that slavery was evil. Brown took extreme measures in the fight to abolish slavery once and for all in the South and West. His fight for ending slavery turned violent and turned into massacres and murdering sprees. After reviewing his actions, John Brown, must be remembered as a misguided fanatic, not a hero, as his beliefs did not justify his actions.…
John Brown had no reason to break the laws of the United States. Not only did he murder people but he attacked a federal facility. Which was completely useless because it didn’t help abolitionists at all. It made it worse because he gave abolitionist a bad name. John brown is a terrorist who had no need to murder people or attack a federal facility.…
What makes a hero or a villain? A hero is defined as a person noted for feats of courage or nobility of purpose, especially one who has risked or sacrificed his or her life.…
John Brown in a way denies having part in this raid. He says “I deny everything but what I have already admitted, of a design on my part to free Slaves.” Brown tries to convince the court that he had no part in the raid and that he was just trying to free the slaves. Upon doing so the raid happened. Another way he pleads his case is by bringing in the wealthy. Brown tries to say that if everything had happened on behalf of a wealthy man, he would not have been punished.…
Recently it came out that Ami Brown of Alaskan Bush People totally missed a visit from her estranged family. Ami's mom went up to Alaska to visit her, but Ami and the family were in Hawaii during that time and they never even got to see each other. Now Ami Brown's mom Earlene Branson is sharing her side of the story, and she isn't very happy that her big 83rd birthday didn't turn out that way she had planned. All that she had hoped for was to see Ami and hopefully, work things out with her after all these years. Radar Online got the chance to speak to her and find out exactly what Ami's mom had to say. She went clear from Texas to Alaska in hopes of reuniting with Ami and her family.…