Preview

Texas V Johnson Case Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
544 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas V Johnson Case Brief
Vanessa Pettengill
February 25, 2015
Professor Frederick W. ODell
Case Brief

Case: Texas v. Johnson Citation: 491 U.S. 397 Year: 1989
Facts:
While the Republican National Convention was taking place in Dallas, Texas in 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson was the only one out of 100 protestors arrested for desecration of a venerated object, charged with violating the Texas Penal Code Ann 42.09(a)(3)(1989). He publicly burned an American Flag as a means of political protest. The purpose of the demonstration was to protest President Ronald Reagan and his administration, certain Dallas based corporations. On several occasions within the rally, others involved spray painted walls and buildings, overturned plants, but it was only the act of the flag burning that initiated arrest. As a matter of fact, Johnson even lead the march, engaged in “die-in” demonstrations to protest nuclear weapons, and shouted various slogans during the march, of which he was not arrested for, just simply because some citizens felt offended over the burning of the flag, there was an arrest made. Johnson was subsequently convicted and sent to one year in prison, and fined $2,000. The Court of Appeals for the 5th District of Texas at Dallas affirmed the conviction, but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, holding that the “State could not, consistent with the First Amendment, punish Johnson for burning the flag in these circumstances”.
Legal Question:
Whether Johnson’s burning of the flag constituted expressive conduct, permitting him to invoke the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and whether the state’s interest in preserving the flag as a symbol of nationhood justifies his conviction?
Holding:
Johnson’s conviction is not consistent with violating the First Amendment by the act of burning the United States of America’s flag. He is protected under the freedom of speech clause in the constitution.
Court’s Reasoning:
Johnson was convicted of flag desecration for burning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On Monday August 21st, A body of a 5-year-old boy was found dead in A drive way of a home in West Mobile. The next day a daycare worker had been arrested and charged with abuse of a corpse.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980, patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery, Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery, resulting in partial paralysis for Johnson (casebriefs.com). Ultimately, Johnson suffered a permanent paralytic condition to his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness as well as a loss of function after undergoing hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky (Showalter,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the many things learned at state police academies around the country is the “Terry pat”. What a Terry pat is, is a basic pat down of a suspects outer clothing, searching for weapons. The name came be known by a Superior Court case in the 1960’s, known as Terry v. Ohio.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before 2004, courthouses and other public buildings differed from how they are today. There was one thing that these buildings did not have, a handicapped entrance. At this time, it could be very embarrassing to be handicapped because you could do nothing for yourself. If you wanted to enter a public building, you had to ask someone to carry you in, or even worse, you might have to crawl up stairs to enter! This was a definite problem that had been around for years, however, no one addressed it.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent was convicted in Dallas County Criminal Court of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute. He was sentenced to one year in prison and fined $2000. The respondent appealed his conviction through the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas. They affirmed the decision of the lower court. The respondent then petitioned for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court then reversed the decision finding Johnson’s flag burning to be “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. Certiorari was granted. The case went to the Supreme Court.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some consider Dred Scott not a citizen. The question has also been raised about the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise and whether it not infringes on an individual’s right to protect property which is written in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. What is considered a man or “men” in the Declaration of Independence is questioned and some justices ask if African Americans or those with slave roots are in the category of this people and if the equality guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the Natural and Common Laws granted by the Constitution is applicable to African American men . The consistent racist rulings by the states courts and eventually the federal court have led to the escalation of the Dred Scott case to the Supreme…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Black dissents there were “no threat or menace to the integrity of trail.” “the courts have consistently required that the press have a free hand, even though we sometimes deplored its sensationalism.”…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Brown contends that he had a firm constitutional right to stand up and support Jennings if he so chose to. As with any Constitutional right, this right must be allowed except when it begins to interfere and infringe on the ability of educators to safely and effectively carry out their duties to other students. Brown v. Cabell, 598.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The States of the United States have individual and unique governments with many similarities. All states are required by the constitution to have republican governments. Despite their similarities, all states have different government structures and procedures, as you will see in the following comparisons of Missouri and Texas state court systems.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch 5 Hw

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    4. According to Texas v. Johnson, flag burning is an example of _________, protected by the ____________.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Johnson believed the Civil Rights Act to be more important than the presidency. While in a discussion about the civil rights bill, Johnson was told: “... it’s going to cost you the South and cost you the election,” to which he responded, “If that’s the price I’ve got to pay, I’ll pay it gladly.” (Document C) Johnson’s response shows that he’d rather lose the presidential election than lose the civil rights bill. In another instance, after Johnson was asked why him so long to act against segregation, he responded with, “Free at last, free at last. Thank God almighty I’m free at last.” (Document E) Johnson was finally “free” from his expectations and obligations as a Texas senator, and political gain was no longer a factor in his decisions. These responses ultimately show how Johnson’s personal beliefs were the deciding factor in his signing of the Civil Rights Act, because he would have signed the bill even if it led to him losing the…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    New York. Irving Feiner gave an inflammatory speech to a diverse crowd. He called for African Americans to revolt against their oppression. After the crowd become restless, Feiner was asked three times to stop. He was arrested and convicted for violating New York’s disorderly conduct law. Supreme Court upheld his conviction based on a clear and present danger of inciting a riot is not protected. Justice Black did not agree with the majority and believed the police should have protected the speaker, not arrest him.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flag Burning

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Luke Saginaw, student author of “Why Flag-Burning Should Not Be Permitted,” favors a constitutional amendment that would outlaw flag-burning. Saginaw argues that flag burning is not speech at all but conduct of the sort that is often illegal. Because the flag symbolizes what so many have died to protect, Americans have deep emotional attachments to it. Thus, flag burning is not political speech but instead an attack upon Americans feelings about the flag. An assault that Saginaw deems as non-permissible.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Flag Burning

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people are offended by the act of publicly burning an American flag and feel it should be outlawed based on the fact that it is offensive to the citizens of this country. Although this may be true, people still have the right to protest. This was upheld in a Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson, where the defendant Mr. Johnson was arrested for publicly burning a flag outside the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas. After being arrested Mr. Johnson was convicted of setting fire to a flag during a protest and chanting with other protesters; "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you"(Texas v. Johnson). He appealed his claim to the Texas Supreme Court of Appeals where they overturned the conviction based on the fact that he was exercising his first amendment right. One of the Supreme Court justices went on to say, "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays