Preview

Business Law Ch 5 Hw

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1781 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Ch 5 Hw
1. Assume that the state of Ohio passed a hazardous waste statute, seeking to protect the general public and workers. The state statute did not violate the Commerce Clause because it imposed no restriction on interstate commerce. Both the state statute and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) established job safety standards and specified worker training and employer licensing, but the requirements differed. Which statute(s) Ohio corporations had to obey? Pick the best ANALYSISwer. a. Ohio corporations must obey all state statutes | | b. Ohio corporations must obey OSHA’s statute and Ohio’s hazardous waste statute | | **c. If there is a conflict between a state statute and a federal statute, the federal statute will win and the state statute will be void. | | d. None of the above is true. | |

2. The Equal Protection Clause, which states that governments must treat people equally, is part of which Amendment? a. The Second Amendment | | b. The Fifth Amendment | | **c. The Fourteenth Amendment | | d. The First Amendment | |

3. Article I of the Constitution created _______ and Article II created _______. **a. the Congress, the Presidency. | | b. the Judiciary, the Congress. | | c. the Presidency, the Congress. | | d. The Presidency, the Judiciary. | | |

4. According to Texas v. Johnson, flag burning is an example of _________, protected by the ____________. **a. symbolic speech, First Amendment. | | b. pure speech, Fifth Amendment. | | c. symbolic speech, Fifth Amendment. | | d. pure speech, First Amendment. | | |

5. Andrew is at work and begins to throw a fit because the copy machine is jammed again. In this outrage, Andrew was screaming out profanity. The company fired him stating that the employee handbook gives using profanity as a reason for immediate termination. Andrew claims that the company is violating his first amendment rights of freedom of speech. Is Andrew correct that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    1. Consideration consists of mutual exchange of gains and losses between contracting parties. In the exchange, a gain by the offer is at the same time a loss to the offeror. The legal term used to designate the gain that each party experiences is that party 's legal benefit. Consideration has three characteristics 1) The agreement must involve a bargained-for exchange; 2)the contract must involve adequate consideration; and 3) the benefits and detriments promised must themselves be legal.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Applied Business Law - 1

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Delilah, does not return with wood pulp, but brings back three contracts. Acting within the scope of her authority, she contracted with Evon, who knew your identity at the time; Felipe, who knew that Delilah was acting on behalf of someone but not whom; and Giorgio, who did not know that Delilah was acting on anyone’s behalf. For which contracts, if any, are you liable? For which contracts, if any, is Delilah liable? Explain.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch 9 Business Law

    • 1559 Words
    • 8 Pages

    If a voidable contract is avoided, the promisee, but not the promisor, is released from it. False, both parties are released from it…

    • 1559 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Chapter 5 6

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No, Emerson is not liable. Emerson clearly stated that children should be kept away. In the owner’s…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Module 6

    • 1803 Words
    • 5 Pages

    8. Sears, Roebuck and Co promised to give Forrer permanent employment, so he sold his farm at a loss to take the job. But shortly after beginning work, he was discharged by Sears who claimed the contract could be terminated at will. Forrer claimed that the promissory estoppel prevented Sears form terminating the contract. Under promissory estoppel a promisor may be prevented from asserting that their promise is unenforceable because the promise gave no consideration for the promise. This is applicable when the promisor makes a promise that lacks consideration, and intends or should reasonably expect that the promise will rely on the promise and in fact does, and that the enforcement of the promise is the only way to avoid injustice. In this case, promissory estoppel did not prevent Sears from terminating the contract. Generally speaking, a contract for permanent employment that provides no additional considerations (such as something benefitting the employer) for employment amounts to just a general hiring that is terminable at the will of either party. The promise was fulfilled once the relationship between Forrer and Sears was established, and no additional benefit to Sears was provided.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Test

    • 4856 Words
    • 20 Pages

    32. A merger that would otherwise be banned under the Clayton Act might be permitted if:…

    • 4856 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quinly and her husband, customers at Greenway Supermarkets, purchased several pounds of filet mignon and checked out their purchases at the newly installed self-scanners. The price listed on the package of meat totaled $38; however, when Quinly swiped the packages through the self-scanner, it indicated a price of only $6. Quinly believed that she should inform the management at the supermarket that the computer in the self-scanner had been incorrectly programmed with respect to the price of this product. However, Quinly’s husband argued that since the store would be legally obligated to charge the lower price, it was not necessary to call attention to the error. Is Quinly correct in her belief that the ethical course of action is to inform the store?…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Chapter 7-9

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The differences the implied-in-the fact contract is from the conduct of the parties and an implied-in-law contract is contract form by words or actions of the parties.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Assignment 1

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    SECOND: This corporation is formed to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the Business Corporation Law, provided that it is not formed to engage in any act or activity requiring the consent or approval of any state official, department, board, agency or other body without such consent or approval first being obtained.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My Personal Manifesto

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages

    7. The law of the land is to be subject to the Constitution as it was originally intended by those who wrote it.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    c. Due process / equal protection clause: deals with the fundamental issues of liberty and justice…

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is paraphrasing"? Can anyone give me an example. Thanks in advance for your time. :0)?…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Week 5

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our team learned this week how to differentiate between types of discriminatory issues and knowing the legal considerations linked to it. This knowledge proved to be beneficial in the team’s decision on how to tackle option one of this week’s team reflection exercise. As a senior manager of a prominent security company, it is important that I look out for the company’s integrity in maintaining its mission of maintaining order, protecting property and the use of deadly force. One of our employees, Joe who recently returned from a successful two years boots in ground deployment in Afghanistan is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). His mental health provider made this diagnosis along with depression, anxiety, and anger issues. As the senior person in-charge of Joe, I have to make a tough decision whether to recommend if Joe should remain in or resign from the company.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law 2

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I am aware that you are wanting to go into business because of your love of natural ice cream. I would like to discuss with you the various types of business entities that exist and the pros and cons of each. Specifically, I will discuss: Limited Liability Company and C Corporations.…

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays