Preview

Taken Without Consent

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
683 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Taken Without Consent
HeLa Cells: Taken Without Consent and Used for Profit
HeLa cells have been around for 65 years. Most people have never heard of HeLa cells. Medical researchers, scientist and biologist know all about them. HeLa cells are a group of cells or “line” taken from a patient and used for scientific research. These groups or lines are usually named after the donor. The cells get their name from the first two letters of the first and last name of the donor. In this case, the donor was a poor black woman named Henrietta Lack (Freeman).
Henrietta Lacks was 31 years old when she was diagnosed with cervical cancer. After her diagnosis in 1951, Henrietta received radiation treatment for her cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore Maryland. It was at this time when a physician sliced off small pieces of tissue from her cervical cancer. This was done without her knowledge and without her consent. Henrietta had a very aggressive form of cancer. Henrietta succumbed to her
…show more content…
The National Institute of Health had done a study and was going to make it public. When the Lacks became aware, the European scientist took their study down and the NIH decided not to publish it. The National Institute of Health never notified the Lacks about this research. Now an agreement has been made that two of Henrietta’s family members will seat on a board to help determine who will get access to the HeLa genome blueprint (Johns Hopkins University) (PH.D.) (Zimmer). And yet in light of all this, the Lacks family will still not receive any money from any profits that the HeLa genome research may produce (Zimmer). Justice is not being served here. You can’t take a patient’s cells without their consent and turn a profit. The next time you go in for tests, blood work or a biopsy, you better ask yourself what they are really doing with your samples. Someone may make a profit off of you and you may never know about

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree that patients should have rights but personally I think that scientific advancement should be prioritized. Without the HeLa and Mo cells, cures would have taken longer to develop. Though it was wrong to keep it in secrecy, if Gey and his team had not taken the cells from Henrietta the world could be very different today. If they had informed Henrietta, she could have denied them taking her cells. In addition, Chakrabarty makes an argument for his patent about an engineered bacteria, where he states “patenting cell lines didn’t require informing or getting permission from the ‘cell donors’” on page 201. Finally, Christoph’s idea of cell ownership compared to oil strengthens the science/doctor’s side.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Henrietta Lacks case brings up a lot of different issues, most of which have to do with ethical dilemmas. First off, Henrietta is an African American woman who came from a poor part of Virginia and was poorly educated and, unfortunately, so was most of her family. Where she grew up was mostly full of members of her family and ended up marrying her cousin, Day, now that is a heavily frowned upon in mainstream society but where she grew up it was normal. She and Day eventually moved to Baltimore, Maryland with their children. Baltimore, at the time, was heavily segregated and racism ran rampant. When she went in to John Hopkins medical center for her first treatment of her misdiagnosed cancer her doctor, without her knowledge, cut a small sliver of her tumor off and gave it to George Gey. Gey then took that sample and produced the first continuously reproducing human cell culture and culture medium to keep them going. After she had died, Gey sent an assistant to get another sliver from her corpse which ultimately failed to produce the same results, but after she had passed Day had only given permission for an autopsy. Eventually,…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is unfortunate that Henrietta Lacks and others were not given the option to decide whether or not they wanted to donate their cells to science. Autonomy is a vital part of decision making that everyone is entitled to. I feel that those who have made a significant contribution should be compensated for the help they have given. It is important that those who are are a key player in medical advances are not only informed of how they have helped, but they also should be rewarded for the sacrifices they have made. If I were Henrietta Lacks I would have been flabbergasted to find out my cells were taken without my permission. Not only would I have been excited to discover that I have been part of a variety of medical breakthroughs but I also would have been upset that I wasn't told earlier or that I did not know originally. Overall, Henrietta Lacks should have been told about the removal of her cells while also being informed about the importance of her cells. For her cells, Lacks should have been compensated because without her the medical world would not be as advanced as it is…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They viewed her as a test subject because her cells were so rare and special. The two main physicians that worked with Henrietta were Howard Jones and Richard TeLinde. Howard Jones was the first gynecologist to look at and biopsy Henrietta’s cervical tumor. Jones believed that radium would be the best form of treatment for Henrietta’s cancer as opposed to surgery. Richard TeLinde was an expert on cervical cancer for his time. He believed that cervical cancers were all carcinoma in situ before they became invasive carcinomas. It became his goal to prove this theory right. For his research, he began collecting cervical cancer cell samples from every patient he could, which would be considered unethical practice today. “TeLinde began collecting samples from any woman who happened to walk into Hopkins with cervical cancer. Including Henrietta” (Skloot…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henrietta’s cells have contributed many great things to both the medical and science fields. Her cells have also started many multi-billion dollar companies that specialize in selling her cells in vast quantities. Yet the Lacks families have received little recognition and compensation from the cells. Many people have argued that no one should be able to profit off their own cells or other body parts, because of the many legal, research, and ethical problems. While others argue that since the cells belonged to Henrietta, she should be able to compensate from them.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” was written by Rebecca Skloot, to tell the story of Mrs. Lacks and her HeLa cells. Henrietta Lacks died of cervical cancer in 1951. A sample of her cancer cells was removed for research prior to her death. Her cells became the first to survive and multiply indefinitely in a lab. These cells have made many advances in medicine. However, the samples were taken without her permission or without her knowledge. The book covers five key ideas which include: racism, poverty, family, morals, and ethics.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This happened on February 5, 1951. Rapidly, Howard Jones educates her, however Henrietta still conceals her analysis from her loved ones. Henrietta goes to the hospital for a couple days keeping in mind the end goal to do treatment and testing. She signs a form that gives the specialist's consent for them to do any surgical procedures that they deemed necessary, however this was purposefully extremely vague. Not long after checking in, the specialists do a number of tests including the use of radium and additionally cutting two little bits of tissue from Henrietta's cervix. Her cervix was going to get cut without her being educated all together for the specialists to have a few samples. One of the samples was sound tissue while the other was the threatening tumor. The samples were taken to George Gey without Henrietta's consent for some testing and analysis on the cells. George Gey does some testing and realizes that the cells doubled in 24 hours and somehow do not die. George Gey names the cells HeLa from Henrietta Lacks' name and imparts this news to his partners. George Gey trusted that he could find a cure for cancer, but all of his attempts had failed, to this day Henrietta's cells are dividing red…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When she turn forty, she was diagnosis with Bone cancer on her arms from repeating exposure to radioactive materials.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henrietta Lacks

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henrietta lacks, a 31 year old black woman who passed away from cervical cancer in Baltimore's Johns Hopkins hospital. Her life was nothing but ordinary at the time yet she went on to be one of the most important people in our history. Henrietta was responsible for the development of numerous vaccines, treatments, careers, significant advancement of medical knowledge, and wealth for others. Howard Jones, her doctor, had sent tissue samples of her carcinoma to Dr.Gey for unrelated testing for an experiment he was conducting without consent. Dr.Gey had been in search for cells that would grow and multiply inside a lab, outside of the body in hopes to find a cure for cancer; he had been taking samples from all his patients without consent in his pursuit. Her cells were taken and sold for large profits, as HeLa, without her and her family’s knowledge while she was being treated and then by deception post mortem. In the book it is mentioned that her identity is kept hidden by Dr.Gey for her safety and patient information confidentiality even though it was not law; publication of her name could have caused nuisance to the hospital. As a result she failed to get recognition in the field of medicine. Upon the discovery of her cells twenty-five years later after her death her family was in disbelief; her husband, David Lacks, “had not signed any paper.” The Lacks received no financial benefit as the HeLa line made millions of dollars. They were unaware of the fact that genetic testing had been done on them and published; also didn’t have the means to contact a lawyer. As a matter of fact a similar case in the name of John Moore v. Regents of the University of California was in trial for the same reasons. Dr.Golde chose to not get consent and used deception to obtain and then develop and patent the Mo cell line which is estimated to be worth three billion…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crichton says there will be a bill to try and make the full benefit of the decoded genome available to us all and believes that it will return us to fuel innovation and common genetic heritage (442). Calfee says the patients and the research process are the beneficiaries because gene patents are working the way they are supposed to be and have been working for a couple of centuries and more (445). One way or another patenting genes affect our privates human genes we are born with, the money it will cost to have tests done on that specific gene if patented, and the scope of which we can do research to help find the best possible solutions, the question is, is gene patenting for the greater good of human beings or are we so money hungry we would rather be blind to…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On November 11th, 2004, NitroMed, a Massachusetts based pharmaceutical company published a study on the effects of a new drug called BiDil in treating heart failure among African Americans in the New England Journal of Medicine (Taylor 2049). Since announcing the study, NitroMed's research has sparked controversy surrounding the ethical implications and scientific evidence of race-based medicine. This study marks a breakthrough in race-based drug treatments as the first pharmaceutical ever researched, endorsed and targeted for a single ethnic group (Pollack 1). The racially-specific pharmaceutical initiative is a product of tremendous government funding allotted by the Clinton administration to the Human Genome Project at the turn of the millennium. Since then, much medical research has focused on understanding the human genome in search of genetic explanations for health problems while funding and interest have decreased in social-related health research and medical programs for poor and underserved populations (Braun 162).…

    • 4392 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without Consent

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the evening of October 12th, 2016 I attended an event called “Got Consent” sponsored by learning beyond the classroom. During this event, Officer Dorcey and several guest speakers spoke about domestic violence and sexual consent. In this paper, I will argue that without consent or while under the influence of alcoholic substance it is not okay to pursue sexual activity. I will argue this by giving exemplification from the occasion I have previously mentioned attending and my experiential perspective on this subject matter. Critics will indicate that while intoxicated a person may be able to approbate intercourse. Critics are mistaken because the law prohibits usage of a motor vehicles while inebriated, if a person cannot efficiently comprehend…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For example, in 1987, in the Greenberg v. Miami Children's Research Hospital Institute case a father of 2 children with Canavan disease worked with a researcher, Reuben Matalon, to organize a registry of “of affected families to collect tissue from willing donors to begin studying the molecular basis of the disease” (Allen). Then, in 1997, an employer of Matalon and Miami Children’s Hospital acquired a patent on the Canavan gene and “began licensing a test to identify Canavan mutations” (Allen). Unfortunately, three nonprofit organizations and four families arranged a law suit stating that Miami Children’s Hospital along with Matalon “used the children’s tissue without consent to license a patent and develop a commercial test” (Allen). With this being said, the four families and 3 nonprofit organizations “claimed, among other things, that they had an ownership interest in the excised tissue and that the defendants ‘converted’ the tissue for their own economic benefit. The court found that the tissue was given voluntarily for research without any expectation of return, and therefore the plaintiffs had no ownership interest in the tissues, or the research performed using the tissue. The court noted that a contrary rule would cripple medical research because it would ‘bestow a continuing right for donors to possess the results of any research conducted by the hospital’” (Allen). Even though the proper use of informed consent was violated and the information of the tissues being used to create commercial test was disregarded, due to the tissues being given voluntarily to research, the donors have no rights to them nor the compensation earned. Also, in some cases the dispute “has been framed as one of tissue ‘guardianship’ (or bailment) vs ‘ownership’” (Allen). When looking at the concept of research specimens “the question is whether the transfer of…

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Should Genes Be Patented?

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court’s decision correctly emphasizes the patent eligibility of the issue at hand, but appears to overlook the ethical consequences of the BRCA patents. This essay thus aims to clarify my support for the Supreme Court’s ruling against a specific form of gene patenting: that of isolating unique DNA structures. My argument finds its premise in the purpose of the patent system, my appreciation for the development of scientific research, and the morality of affordable medical analyses.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic tests are laboratory procedures that identify changes in our genes. Most human disease results, in whole or in part, from alterations in genes. Because the tests are expected to have incredible predictive power and because they may tell us personal information before we are ready to receive it, testing requested by a third party could be considered an infringement on privacy. Furthermore, the technology is new and thus subject to errors in interpretation that could result in unfair discrimination against the person who has been tested. Genes are inherited and are found not only in a single individual but also in some blood relatives. A genetic test therefore involves many people and invades the privacy of all. This paper questions the right of insurers to demand genetic tests but notes that by concealing the results of tests, applicants may practice adverse selection. If ethics are rules of conduct that society requires, then insurers will need to reexamine their ethical responsibilities in the light of this new technology.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays