Preview

Supersonic jet and crossflow interaction: Computational modeling

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
16576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supersonic jet and crossflow interaction: Computational modeling
Progress in Aerospace Sciences 57 (2013) 1–24

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Progress in Aerospace Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paerosci

Supersonic jet and crossflow interaction: Computational modeling
Ez Hassan a,d, John Boles b, Hikaru Aono c, Douglas Davis d, Wei Shyy a,e,n a Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Taitech, Inc., Beavercreek, OH, USA
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara, Japan d Air Force Research Laboratory, Fairborn, OH, USA e The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong b c

a r t i c l e i n f o

abstract

Available online 9 August 2012

The supersonic jet-in-crossflow problem which involves shocks, turbulent mixing, and large-scale vortical structures, requires special treatment for turbulence to obtain accurate solutions. Different turbulence modeling techniques are reviewed and compared in terms of their performance in predicting results consistent with the experimental data. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models are limited in prediction of fuel structure due to their inability to accurately capture unsteadiness in the flow. Large eddy simulation (LES) is not yet practical due to prohibitively large grid requirement near the wall. Hybrid RANS/LES can offer reasonable compromise between accuracy and efficiency. The hybrid models are based on various approaches such as explicit blending of RANS and LES, detached eddy simulation (DES), and filter-based multi-scale models. In particular, they can be used to evaluate the turbulent Schmidt number modeling techniques used in jet-in-crossflow simulations. Specifically, an adaptive approach can be devised by utilizing the information obtained from the resolved field to help assign the value of turbulent Schmidt number in the sub-filter field. The adaptive approach combined with the multi-scale model improves the results especially



References: Expo. 2000: Munich, Germany. E. Hassan et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 57 (2013) 1–24 [39] Lin K-C, Ryan M, Carter C, Gruber M, Raffoul C

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Related Topics