Preview

Summary Treaty Of Waitangi

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
722 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Treaty Of Waitangi
Katherine
Ms. Collins
11IB English B
2 April 2015
Summary: Treatment of Maori
Intolerance towards indigenous people is typical colonial societies. European colonists settled in New Zealand justified their exploitation and enslavement as culturing and civilizing native people which were regarded as uncivilized people by European colonists (mainly British people). In New Zealand, Māori, as individuals and communities, were the subject of racism and discrimination when Europeans immigrants (Pakeha) first came to New Zealand (“Ethic and religious intolerance”). Maori gave the initial welcome which was “soon strained as more and more of the arrivals began to ignore Maori jurisdiction and act as if they were a law unto themselves” (Treaty of Waitangi Questions and Answers 9).
The discrimination towards Maori partly based on the assumption of cultural superiority of European colonists. The conversion of Māori to Christianity, the growing dominance of the land and the institutions of the New Zealand state were based on beliefs about the superiority of European civilization and the perceived backwardness of Māori culture. So the lawlessness of Pakeha provoked public anger among indigenous people. Partly for humanitarian reasons, but primarily to protect British trade interests, the British government appointed James Busby to act as British Resident in New Zealand. The Declaration of Independence, which was signed on October 28, 1835 between Busby and rangatira, clarified that “no separate legislative authority” would be allowed in the country unless appointed by rangatira “in congress assembled.” (Treaty of Waitangi Questions and Answers 9)
Besides, the Treaty of Waitangi is an agreement signed on February 6, 1840, by Captain Hobson, representing Queen Victoria, and by more than 500 Maori rangatira (chiefs), which “enabled the peaceful acquisition of land for settlement purposes and ensured that immigrants could come and live here in peace” and regulated Pakeha’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Nanking was signed on the 29th of August 1842. This treaty was ratified by the British and Qing Chinese representatives following the end of ‘The First Opium War’, a conflict which saw Chinese conscripts go up against a much smaller force of technologically advanced British troops, and lose decisively. Because of the humiliating loss on China’s part, they signed the Treaty of Nanking which contained thirteen articles but there were three which were most important in regards to global connections. Those were the opening of five ‘treaty ports’, the ceding of Hong Kong island to Britain and the reparations and compensation payments which totalled approximately $21 million silver dollars.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout Australian history a racist attitude towards Aboriginals has been a significant issue. From the moment the early settlers arrived on our shores and colonised, the Aboriginals have been fighting…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    At Queen Liliuokalani’s birth no one knew of the struggles and trials she was to face. Neither did they know that she would be the last reigning monarch of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Queen Liliuokalani made many difficult decisions during her reign but she did so with the hope of establishing sovereignty and preserving the islands for the native people. The United States played a major role with the dethroning of Queen Liliuokalani and the annexation of Hawaii as they gradually encroached upon the Islands through trade and commerce, taking away power from their Monarchy, and completely disregard Hawaii’s own desire for sovereignty as the political leaders of the U.S. only sought to gain control for their own benefit.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “BECAUSE it is proposed by said treaty to confiscate said property, technically called the crown lands, those legally entitled thereto, either now or in succession, receiving no consideration whatever for estates, their title to which has been always undisputed, and which is legitimately in my name at this date.” In this quotation from the letter written from Queen Liliuokalani to the president of the United States, Pres. McKinney, in 1897, states that the islands of Hawaii, also known as the crown lands, are still legally entitled to her. That she is the rightful ruler and that the title of queen is still hers. The counter claim to this, however, is that even though Queen Liliuokalani did inherit the throne of Hawaii in 1891, the Americans, if they have the power to do so, can still take the Hawaiians Independence from them.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ravensong Sparknotes

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Based on this way of thinking Indigenous people were constructed as uncivilized and unimportant people. This kind of attitude toward a group of people and the actions based on that is itself a violation of the right of those people. It is because colonizers gave the freedom and rights of the first nations. Their lives were not important and they had no rights to ask for more rights. For example in the novel Ravensong when flu comes to the area hospitals in the town do not care about people dying in the village and they do not treat them or help them in any way, so people in Stacey community are left alone and a lot of them die (Maracle 51).…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of owning land was a completely new idea for the Hawaiian people. This "land ownership" idea was a major demand from foreigners. To the Hawaiian people, land belonged to the gods. People were not meant to own land, just care for it. Foreigners were very frustrated with the fact that they needed permission from the king to build a house, church, etc… Even then it could be revoked and the house or church would be ripped to the ground. Some of these foreigners acted as they did own the land that they lived on and expected their home governments to back them up. On November 16th, 1836 British war ships came to Hawaii with a treaty attempting to solve the land disagreements.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Paris

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Paris of 1763 was a treaty that officially ended the French and Indian War. This treaty was signed on February 10, 1763 by England, France, and Spain. The French and Indian War was a more wide European conflict in which England and Prussia went against France, Austria, Russia and Spain. The major cause of the war was the struggle for territorial expansion among the land west of the Appalachian Mountains, know then as the Ohio Territory.This war was also known as the Seven Years War and The Treaty of Paris concluded it. During the Treaty of Paris in 1763, France lost Canada and all claims to the territory east of the Mississippi to Great Britain, but gained back Martinique and Guadeloupe. Meanwhile Spain with the desire to recover Cuba, which Britain had taken from them gave up Florida in exchange. To recompense its ally France gave all of Louisiana west of the Mississippi and New Orleans to Spain, but with these being the only exceptions, England now had the whole land of North America east of the Mississippi in its power. The majority of Spanish and African occupants of Florida left and established somewhere else in parts of the Spanish empire, but all French settlers maintained occupying Canada, the Illinois country, and Spanish Louisiana. Over all the triumph, on the race for the most power, was for England. As understood the British colonies were experiencing great happiness at this point because the warfare seemed over at last. For them this meant that the colonies could now develop their extensive resources in an imperial partnership and share their never before experienced prosperity. However, this treaty was only going to begin to tear the colonies and the mother country…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism In Hawaii

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In response to her people, she started working on a constitution that would place power back in the hands of the monarchy, and restore the native’s ability to vote. The businessmen on the island, most prominently Sanford B. Dole, seized power, and imprisoned queen Liliuokalani. The business people wanted Hawaii annexed from the US. This would remove taxes on imports from Hawaii, and put a large sum of money in the hands of Dole and his cohorts. Up until that point, Hawaii had enjoyed a tariff free favoured trade status, thanks to a treaty signed in 1875. The McKinley tariff in 1890 drastically raised the price of…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian Aborigines were the first people to live on the continent Australia, being here longer than the White Australians. During that time, the Aboriginal people made a special bond with the land and their kinship to their families. After the invasion of the Europeans settlers, laws were introduced to take away the land traditionally owned. Protectionism was one of the first policies meaning that Aborigines and the European settlers were separated and ‘protected’ for their own good. This was failing and that’s when assimilation was introduced which meant…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As with any race or culture there will be racism and discrimination no matter what and with the First Nations it's no different. So were going to talk about what was racist and how it affected the First Nations people through time. So let's start from the beginning. Racism against First Nations people began soon after European settlement in North America.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This account shows the imperialist mentality of “my culture is better than yours” that began to shape relations with aboriginals. Furthermore, these practices, while the norm, were the causes for the genocidal practices like the Indian Act, and later with the amendment that created the Indian residential school…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Royal, Te Ahukaramu Charles. 2013. 'Māori - Pre-European society ' Te Ara - the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. 11 September. Accessed May 10, 2014. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/maori/page-2.…

    • 2512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Australian Indigenous Rights

    • 2801 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Patten, J.T. and Ferguson. W. ‘Aborigines claim citizen rights!’ In J Horner, (1974) Vote Ferguson for Aboriginal Freedom. (pp 192-199) Sydney: Australia and New Zealand Book Company.…

    • 2801 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal fiction upon which Australia was founded refers to the British doctrine, “terra nullius”. The phrase translates to “land without ownership”. When Australia was founded, even though the colonisers acknowledged the presence of the Indigenous they considered the Aboriginals too primitive to be actual owners. The Aboriginals were considered too primitive with no identifiable hierarchy or political structure. This legal fiction had a significant impact on Australia with the widely known Mabo Case. In May 1982, Eddie Mabo and four other plaintiffs of the Murray Islands pursued confirmation of their traditional land rights in the High Court of Australia. Their claim had been that Murray Island (Mer) had been previously inhabited and had been possessed by the Meriam people with their own social and political organisations. After 10 years and the death of Mabo, on June 3 1992, the High Court ruled that the lands of Australia were not terra nullius when European settlement occurred and the Meriam people were entitled to the lands of Murray Island. Then in December 1993, the Native Title Act was produced as part of the Commonwealth’s response to the High Court’s decision to protect the native lands of Aboriginals. The legal fiction has therefore had a major impact on Australia’s legal history with the introduction of the Native Title Act where the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were compensated for the dispossession of their lands.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another form of discrimination that was placed upon the Aboriginal population was the assimilation families and children faced through the integration of residential schools. The idea behind residential schools was to try and “civilize” the Aboriginal nation. Children were taken from their families and were forced into forgetting their language, traditions, hunting and gathering skills, until they were entirely “European”. The discrimination faced by the Aboriginal nation still to this day is well beyond horrific. In her article “The Queen and I: discrimination against women in the Indian Act continues” Lynn Gehl states that “the goal of the Indian Act was one of assimilation and the arduous task of civilizing the savages--a national agenda” (Gehl, 2000). Residential schools, paternity laws, denied access to Indian status and criminalization of Indigenous culture imposed from the government are all examples of how the Aboriginal population has been racialized and discriminated from European settlers and the country of…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics