Preview

Summary Of Alan Dershowitz

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
275 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Alan Dershowitz
A summary of an Alan M. Dershowitz essay Alan M. Dershowitz in his essay “A Real Test of Any Proposed Speech Code or Policy” reports the cases of politician Tom Paulin and poet Amira Baraka. Tom Paulin was invited to Harvard to offer a speech that emphasizes hatred and racism toward the Jews, the author admits his words are offensive but he does not want to encourage Harvard to censor them. Dershowitz then gives us a second case of Amira Baraka a poet that was invited by a black student organization named Nubia to give a speech that was racist towards Israel claiming they had warned the Israelis to not go close to The World Trade Center previous the attacks of September 11th. The author argues if lies should be censored and says “these

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jon Katz, an American journalist and author, also argued: “Institutions that are supposed to be breeding grounds for original and innovative thought have embraced the forced re-ordering of moral conscience” (Katz). However, speech codes do not stifle freedom of speech. It merely adds to the exclusions of the first amendment in order to create a safe learning environment and equal opportunities for all. Speech codes, in no way, limit learning, in fact, they enhance learning…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sean McElwee overall claim in "The Case for Censoring Hate Speech" , is showing how people are easily influenced by the media, websites known as Reddit, Facebook, and twitter. Which allow bigot comments, #hashtags, and remarks to certain touchy topics. The article also talks about the two targets of hate speech, one being a way to target a minority and uplift sectarians of the world. The author uses words in the text to show a serious, concerned and progressive tone for the audience .In the article the author shows how he is progressive, by mentioning how we need to all blame ourselves and put forth effort to fix it.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the last year, the best book that I have read was My Beloved World by Sonia Sotomayor. It is a autobiography of the life of Sonia Sotomayor, beginning in the Bronx and ending with her in the Supreme Court. She talks about her dreams as a young girl and how she pursued these dreams throughout her college career. After college, she became a prosecutor and began working in the Manhattan D.A’s office. The autobiography ends before her appointment to the supreme court. The most appealing part of this book is her message to women and minorities. She proves that determination and willpower are the most important characteristics a person needs to succeed. I appreciated the fact that the book ended before her appointment in August 2009 because it…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Can words kill people?” (2017) Kathleen Parker (an Opinion Writer for The Washington Post) declares that while words matter, the First Amendment entitles each person to free speech. Parker reinforces her declaration by informing about the limits of free speech (“the Constitution’s protections for nearly every form of speech short of the ‘fire’-in-a-crowded-theater prohibition.”), giving an example of what should be considered free speech (Carter telling her boyfriend to kill himself but her not helping him or actually killing him), and claiming “Words do matter, but they’re not lethal.” She informs, gives an example, and makes a claim in order to illustrate why cases like Carter’s should not result in a conviction (“what she said to…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That the censoring of one's language is a "violation of the First Amendment" and an attack on one's…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In "You Have Insulted Me" a letter by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. is another good example of censorship in our own society. That relates to Fahrenheit 451 concerning censorship but there is…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Censorship in Judy Blume

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "The Censorship Pages -- Information on Censorship of the Written Word." Books AtoZ | Home Page…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limitations on freedoms of society are crucial, especially in America. As Roger Rosenblatt noted in his essay, “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead,” many people express their freedom of speech in very offensive and controversial ways. Often their expressions violate other amendments and freedoms as well.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American people, we know that we are entitled to certain rights according to the constitution; one of which is freedom of speech. In Civility and Its Discontents, Leslie Epstein explores the limits and contradictions of this much cherished right when considering whether he would expel a student who wrote racial slurs in the dorm rooms of a University if it was up to him. He discusses this situation and topics that stem from it in an analytical yet somewhat emotionally involved tone and makes the reader reflect on the wide range of information presented about the issues of political correctness, freedom of speech, expulsion, and racism.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the wake of school shootings, cracking down on potential threats has become priority. Not only are there threats of mass violence, but racist speech and sexist speech, that some would define as fighting words. A question to ask is when does speech become a fighting word. Having to decide what speech is protected by the first amendment, worthwhile, and what speech has no social value and is not protected, worthless, is controversial. Speech that is defined as worthless include: lewd, obscene, profane, libelous, and fighting words. Focusing on fighting words and the ever developing world of technology, we will examine a present-day situation of words that wound and compare them to past cases.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship in America

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Witherbee, Amy and Cushman, C. Ames. "Counterpoint: Sometimes Censorship is Necessary." 2011. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 21 March 2012.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What does freedom of expression really mean? Why is it important to our democratic society? In the landmark case of R. v. Keegstra (1990), the issues of freedom of expression and hate speech is brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada. The case also deals with issues of whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) and section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The courts view that the objectives of having freedom of speech are correlated with democracy in the sense that for members of society to have their voices heard, they must be free to speak on matters that provide value back to society. This case has served as precedence for other freedom of expression cases. R. v. Keegstra can be looked at through many of the legal principles, but for the purposes of this essay, I will focus on the Offense Principle. This principle, brought forward by Joel Feinberg, is a tangent of John Mill’s Harm Principle, which deals with non-physical harm, such as hate speech. This is evident when looking at R. v. Keegstra, as the Offense Principle is the best principle to articulate why the dissenting judges ruled the way they did. I believe that the lead dissenting judge, Beverly McLachlin, ruled accurately in her judgement and I intend to support this ruling throughout this essay. As well, I will provide a summery of R. V. Keegstra, look at Philosophical principles as…

    • 2805 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racist speech

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Lawrence, Charles, R. “The Debates Over Placing Limits on Racist Speech Must Not Ignore the Damage It Does to Its Victims”. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1989. 1-4.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship in Schools

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. “How Big a Problem is Censorship.” National Coalition against Censorship, in support of free expression. 18 Feb. 2008…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays