Preview

Sean Mcelwee: The Case For Censoring Hate Speech Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
680 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sean Mcelwee: The Case For Censoring Hate Speech Summary
Sean McElwee overall claim in "The Case for Censoring Hate Speech" , is showing how people are easily influenced by the media, websites known as Reddit, Facebook, and twitter. Which allow bigot comments, #hashtags, and remarks to certain touchy topics. The article also talks about the two targets of hate speech, one being a way to target a minority and uplift sectarians of the world. The author uses words in the text to show a serious, concerned and progressive tone for the audience .In the article the author shows how he is progressive, by mentioning how we need to all blame ourselves and put forth effort to fix it. In the phrase, “he map’s existence draws into question the notion that the “twittersphere” can organically combat hate …show more content…
The author shows the concerned tone by question the future of what will happen, and always talking about the future of still having hate speeches. In the second quote it says, “Consider the number of rapes that go unreported. Could this trend possibly be impacted by Reddit threads like /r/rapingwomen or /r/mensrights?” This quote is showing how the author is concern if the need of hate speeches are coming from reddit. Another quote , “The rape culture that permeates Facebook, Twitter and the public dialogue must be held at least partially responsible for our larger rape …show more content…
When he starts to talk about Free speech he makes statements that question the original idea of someone. In the phrase he says, “ “There are a lot of other nice people out there.”Those who claim to “defend free speech” when they defend the right to post hate speech online, are in truth backwards. Free speech isn’t an absolute right; no right is weighed in a vacuum. The court has imposed numerous restrictions on speech. “ The phrase is showing how defending free speech can also be bad, since it's not a right. It also showing how some people can use freedom of speech as a way to defend hate speeches. The tone of the author is confirming the idea of freedom of speech of being a way to encourage hate
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Defense Of Hashtag Activism By Danah Boyd: Article Analysis
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Defense Of Hashtag Activism By Danah Boyd: Article Analysis

    She used the hashtags ‘#Concernedstudent1950’ and ‘#BlackLivesMatter’ as examples, both for the black minority facing discrimination needing a voice to call attention to what was happening. These hashtags’ causes became widely debated throughout the country, proving how effectively it had influenced people. She argues that the underrepresented minority is given an online voice via Twitter, which translates into action that affects people. However, unless it becomes ‘trending’, the argument loses effectivity and gets lost in the sea of other ‘voices’.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Have You Ever Read The Book 'Anthem' By Ayn Rand
    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Have You Ever Read The Book 'Anthem' By Ayn Rand

    Freedom of speech is the right to express your ideas and opinions when you’re speaking. Equality 7-2521 was a very intelligent man. He was the smartest in his class, also known as Home of Students. Home of Students is a boarding school where he lives. He was full of ideas which he wasn’t allowed to express. Everybody had to be the same; nobody…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Vandalized By Speech Summary
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Vandalized By Speech Summary

    In the article “Vandalized by Speech” by Gregory Rodriguez, he claims that hate speech is form of vandalism. He compares the subject to a broken window; if left untended, it signals people to do more damage. Rodriguez states that any discussion of the subject leads to the invocation of the 1st Amendment. He goes on to say that hate speech is a threat to our democracy and society, and it should be regulated. Additionally, Rodriguez argues that hate speech is making appearances everyone from political campaigns to college pep bands. He claims that minorities bear an extra burden when entering the public space. He also points out that negative campaigning leads to less political participation. Furthermore, Rodriguez argues that rhetorical vandalism…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Legislation Restricting Hate Speech Analysis
    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page

    Legislation Restricting Hate Speech Analysis

    Given the narrow basis for the constitutionality of legislation restricting hate speech, Rothstein J. held that additional language of the Saskatchewan Code extending to expression that "ridicules, belittles or otherwise affronts the dignity" of persons on the basis of a prohibited ground was not justified under s. 1 of the Charter, and thus of no force and…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paglia's Essay Rape A Bigger Danger Than Feminist Know
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Paglia's Essay Rape A Bigger Danger Than Feminist Know

    Camille Paglia’s essay “Rape A Bigger Danger Than Feminists Know” discusses the controversial issue of rape, and argues that feminists have secluded the truth about sex from younger women. The essay was published in 1991 by the New York Newsday. According to Paglia, who has a Ph.D. in humanities, “Feminism keeps saying the sexes are the same. It keeps telling women they can do anything, go anywhere, say anything, wear anything. No, they can’t. Women will always be in sexual danger” (579). She mentions that woman are not physically incapable of doing whatever they desire, therefore, they should take extra precautions to ensure their safety. In support of her thesis, the author addresses the Northeastern campuses that have begun petitioning to raise awareness for what they call, “victims” (579). Paglia elaborates on how the punishment for rape has become less severe. In her days, accusers could be hung, knifed, or even sentenced to death for rape (579). She goes on to say that women will never have the opportunity to engage in…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

    This language restricts government’s ability to constrain the speech of citizens, however, the prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Notwithstanding the often broad freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment, there are some historically rooted exceptions, as the Supreme Court has identified categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment and may be prohibited entirely. Among these categories are “fighting words” and words and actions that create an incitement of violence, both of which lay beyond the shield of First Amendment protection. I. Background In 1942, the United States Supreme Court established the “fighting words” doctrine by a 9-0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, where the Court held that fighting words “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Free Speech Is Flunking Out On College Campuses Summary
    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Free Speech Is Flunking Out On College Campuses Summary

    “Women, sexual assault victims, people of color, transgender students. College campuses have created “safe spaces” for all sorts of marginalized groups. But in the process, one member of the campus community has lost precious real estate. Free speech” (1). This quote from the article “Free Speech is Flunking Out on College Campuses” by Catherine Rampell introduces the idea that the right to freedom of speech is being squashed. All over the country, colleges are taking away this right from their students in order to protect others, but in reality, they are only stripping them of what is protected under the Constitution. Censorship has spread to social media apps causing students to be in constant danger of being accused of harassment. Claims…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Censors Martin Luther King Jr Analysis
    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Censors Martin Luther King Jr Analysis

    The idea of freedom can be seen in Collection 2 of our textbook. Freedom can be seen in the speech, “I Have A Dream” by Martin Luther King Jr, when he was speaking out to everyone about his dream to have the same rights as white men. A lack of freedom can be seen throughout the short story, “The Censors” by Luisa Valenzuela, when Juan discusses about how every letter is carefully read, which is an invasion of privacy. “Reading Lolita In Tehran” by Azar Nafisi also showed a lack of freedom, when the author discusses the lack of rights that women had to put up with.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Ofn Racist Speech
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Ofn Racist Speech

    At the introduction of his essay, he expressly stated that he has spent the better part of his life as dissenter. To be a dissenter speaks outright the way he behaves in society because of his adherence to the liberties provided in the First Amendment. In avoiding discussions particularly the Freedom of Speech would just give the impression of tolerance specially the protection from government regulations concerning bad speech but could be achieve by practice of all concerned individuals.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Censorship: Gavin Mcinnes And Michael Anti
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Censorship: Gavin Mcinnes And Michael Anti

    In the world today there are many controversial topics which lead to many different perspectives about the different topics. A controversial topic is censorship. Censorship is the prohibition of any parts of books, movies, etc. that are considered unacceptable in society. Censorship is like any other controversial topic, there are people who are supporting and opposing censorship. But the people who live in the world are split between pro-censorship and anti-censorship, whether or not to censor certain books at schools. Definite view for pro-censorship has occurred in the Supreme Court ruling and the opinion of a congress member. While definite opposing view toward censorship is Gavin Mcinnes and Michael Anti. In order to understand the purpose…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On The Internet Should Be Regulated Analysis
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hate Speech On The Internet Should Be Regulated Analysis

    The author argues that regulating the Internet’s hate speech limits free speech. Starr also uses pathos by mentioning religious books such as the Qur’an and the Bible in order to appeal to his audience by saying that removing certain speech from the Internet is like removing messages from these books. He also provides the reader with evidence by saying that the Internet already has censorship inducing people to report things that might be offensive, that statement contradicts his main argument but he does a good use of it by mentioning that this is a way to behave in a authoritarian manner, seeking to regulate everything we say in the internet. Starr arguments seem to be well organized, because she provides examples and evidence in order to convey her arguments. She uses logos by presenting statistics in which she shows the percentage of hate speech contained in all Web…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper
    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper

    In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Under Amendment Advantages
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under Amendment Advantages

    Some people take advantage of the freedom of speech.According to the observer it states that “these same people would claim that the right of freedom of speech has a limit that ends once a speaker’s words turn offensive or derogatory”.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    College Censorship Rules

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hate Speech Policy
    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hate Speech Policy

    Since the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995, the number of hate sites has increased from one to many. “Today, Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Anti-Defamation League have documented about 2,800 hate sites,” and growing (Leet, 288). Since globalization took place in our world, the internet has become a place where anyone is able to expose all sorts of information to the billions of eyes of the public. Globalization has it’s positive effects and also, increasingly, it’s negative; Hate speech on cyberhate sites is one of them. The United States is one of the most diverse countries in the world. There is however still a notion that the white people are the ‘superior race’. Racial discrimination is still very much alive in our world…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics