Censorship: Gavin Mcinnes And Michael Anti

In the world today there are many controversial topics which lead to many different perspectives about the different topics. A controversial topic is censorship. Censorship is the prohibition of any parts of books, movies, etc. that are considered unacceptable in society. Censorship is like any other controversial topic, there are people who are supporting and opposing censorship. But the people who live in the world are split between pro-censorship and anti-censorship, whether or not to censor certain books at schools. Definite view for pro-censorship has occurred in the Supreme Court ruling and the opinion of a congress member. While definite opposing view toward censorship is Gavin Mcinnes and Michael Anti. In order to understand the purpose
When censorship is taken into court, they're two principles. The first principle is the amount of people who are offended by the expression cannot effect the case ruling. The second principle is if the expression is direct to harm others like falsely shouting fire in a crowded area (ACLU 6). The judge and the Supreme Justices had to consider the two principles of censorship; the amount of people offended and directly harming others. The purpose of knowing that cases about censorship can go to court shows that court’s ruling can be change because they have in the past. For example, the ruling on whether or not to discriminate against African-
The congressman, Mcinnes, school principal, and Michael Anti all were involved in different situation of censorship and all have different views whether supporting or opposing censorship. The congressman who disapprove the violence in the television because he does not want children watching people fight or die, even though it’s not real. Whereas the principals from the schools enforced their disapproval of their school newspaper for its inappropriate topics. On the other hand, Gavin Mcinnes believed that people should be able to choose and decide whether or not to watch or read something. Michael Anti enlightens censorship of the Chinese internet and how censorship is used as isolation. The Supreme Court Justices ruled their case dealing with censorship as whether continuing the newspaper on school grounds articles be offensive or no newspaper. The Supreme Court is the mediator between supporting and opposing