Chapter 5: Animadversions on Some Writers Who Have Rendered Women Objects of Pity, Bordering on Contempt.
Eighteenth century philosophical theories popularised an egalitarianism universalism, however it is evident such theories did not reach concepts of the female gender and its role. Instead, Enlightenment theories supported a social and political system, which consigned women to the domestic sphere because of their inferiority to men in the aspects of mental capacity, education, and biological differences. Rosalind Carr argues ‘women were never invisible in the Enlightenment, but their participation was constrained by gender’ (2014; 73). Within Enlightenment culture it is evident women were present, for example, females often led discussions within Enlightenment salons in France and England . However as far as involvement went, women’s participation seemed very limited due to constrictions placed on female participation in society.
Within this essay, I will be analysing eighteenth century ideologies surrounding the female gender and its role in Enlightenment culture. Due to the word count and length of the chapter, I have decided to select and explore the …show more content…
‘Her dress is modest in appearance, and yet very coquettish in fact…every part of her dress was only put in its proper order to be taken to pieces by the imagination’ (Wollstonecraft 1982; 188). Barbara Taylor argues Sophie’s role in Emile’s life is to be nothing more than an illusion, which Emile will prefer to the real objects (Taylor 2003; 76). In response to Rousseau Wollstonecraft heavily condemns his fixation on beauty and sexual desire in females, to which she questions what is female understanding sacrificed for, if men will soon ignore beauty after a few months and grow to despise it? (1982;