Preview

Stalin and Propaganda

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stalin and Propaganda
Established as one of the most authoritative and intimidating rulers to have ever walked the face of the Earth, Joseph Stalin was the unmatched communist leader of the Soviet Union for nearly three decades. His regime of fear and terror took the lives of millions, and the implementation of harsh commanding methods consolidated his supreme control over the nation. From 1924 to 1940, the key elements involved in Stalin’s dictatorial regime over the Soviet Union were political propaganda and the accumulation of fear. These aspects resulted in additional governing procedures; the acute censorship of the media and education, and use of the secret police. Together, these components of Stalin’s rule enabled him to manipulate Russian society and therefore maintain his supreme authority over the Soviet Union. Communist revolutionary, Vladimir Lenin, was Stalin’s predecessor in the leadership of
Bolshevik Communist Party; a leadership which lasted from the early 1900’s until Lenin died in 1924. After the armed takeover of the government in 1917, Lenin was accompanied by Leon Trotsky, and the Bolshevik Communist Party became the governing body of Russia. At this point, Stalin had been of little significance regarding the Party’s political growth, and ultimately was not considered to be a symbolic member of the Bolshevik faction. Trotsky described him as the Party’s most “eminent mediocrity” and historian Chris Truman states that “Stalin was seen as ‘dull’ and ‘uninteresting’ by the intellectual elite”. In corroboration, Dennett and Dixon convey that “Stalin was not an intellectual and had no strong talents in the areas of writing or speaking”, and further describe Stalin’s major role within the Party as one of organisation and practicality, rather than leadership. These qualities, however, were not wasted as Lenin recognised Stalin as a hard-working and organised member of the Party, and as a result Stalin was able to ascend the Party’s ranks.

On becoming General

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The terrors of a totalitarian government presented in George Orwell's 1984 apply not only to the Party, but also to the Stalinist Russia of the 1930's. Frightening similarities exist between these two bodies which both started out as forms of government, and then mutated into life-controlling political organizations which "subordinated all institutions and classes under one supreme power" (Buckler 924). Orwell shows how such a system can impose its will on the people through manipulation of media, constant supervision as aided by technology, and the threat of pain, both physical and mental. Orwell also shows how the state has more subtle methods for imposing its authority, such as the manipulation of language and propaganda as they are used to achieve the goal of absolute power for the system. A key parallel between the Party and Stalin's Communism is the use of technology and communication to control the economic, social, and personal aspects of life.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There was a rather significant continuity between Lenin and Stalin’s policies on Political Control. When the Bolsheviks first came in to power Lenin banned Liberal parties who where seen as a threat and later banned all parties including the Social Revolutionaries’ (SR’s) who shared similar views to the Communist party. After the SR’s had beaten them in the elections for the constituency assembly Lenin dismissed these elections and closed down the seemly as well as banning the political parties. USSR was now a one party state with secret police (CHEKA) to eliminate any opposition. Stalin simply kept it this way. Stalin also had secret police (NKVD), Before 1924 Lenin and his ’Red terror’ had been successful in eliminating all opposition outside of the communist party and faced none within the party. However, due to Stalin’s controversial takeover he faced heavy opposition. To keep this opposition repressed Stalin carried out a series of purges. To purge the Party meant, expelling members who, in one way or another, were unreliable. The purge of the Party spread, it came to involve more than just the Party. In 1937 it spread to the arm forces and then quickly came to effect the ordinary people. By 1938 virtually the entire population was living in a state of terror. Stalin’s Great terror led to no opposition and USSR was complete in Stalin’s control. This is where Lenin and Stalin differ because under Lenin there had been free fierce and passionate…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miriam Dobson argues that Khrushchev’s speech was necessary for voicing the ordeals of ordinary people who suffered under Stalinism who would otherwise be unheard: ‘…only the Secret speech allowed their stories to be told’. Stalinism, according to Khrushchev, was associated with ‘an army of willing perpetrators of terror, but also a mentality of fear, subservience, deceit and stifled initiative’. As such, it is also important to recognise that the critique of Stalin had only taken place once Stalin and his system had firmly established control – it was the ruler that had to be condemned, rather than the line of…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever since World War Two, when the dictators Hitler and Stalin rose to power, a new form of government has become ever more prevalent, both in popular culture and real life (Arendt). Through a singular ideology and extensive propaganda campaigns, totalitarian governments control the populace as completely as they are able, discouraging individual thought and criticism of their regime (Laqueur). Although relatively young in conception, the idea of a controlling, near-omnipotent government has left a lasting impression on our culture. Current dictators, such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, bend the indoctrination techniques to their will (Shuster), and novelists such as Huxley and Orwell portrayed such governments in their respective…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As with any authoritarian state, a necessary tool needed to control any discontent was through the use of force. For Stalin, he implemented this through Gulags and the Secret Police. Any type of outright dissent to Stalin would result in the individual being sent to the Gulag, a treacherous work camp in Siberia, where prisoners could either work to create various projects, and in many cases die in the process. 2 million people were deported to the Gulags, and hundreds of thousands died. But this was just the beginning- Stalin instilled a greater use of force in the Soviet Union, the Great Terror, which lasted from 1936 to 1938. It consisted of a campaign to eradicate any ex-kulaks, clergy members, criminals, anyone who could possibly pose a threat to the new communist paradise Stalin was creating. It also consisted of a huge removal of anyone suspected of supporting Trotsky, especially those with positions in the Communist party itself. This led to about 6 million arrests, 3 million executions, and 2 million deaths on account of people being sent to the Gulags. The Secret Police was the method through which Stalin was able to enforce this huge removal of possible dissent. The People’s Commissariat of Internal Affairs was the enforcement agency that carried out the will of the Communist Party. They would secretly assassinate or arrest any individual who posed a threat. And Stalin had also instilled several facets into his…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People believe that the reason why Stalin rose to power was because of his clever political strategy and the way he worked with the civilians to gain their support. Soon they realised that Stalin was now in control of the way everybody thinks and wiping out hundreds of people everyday. This essay will briefly explain how Stalin was able to succeed during the New Economic Policy debate and rise into authority, how he managed to establish his power throughout the land of Russia and built a foundation on his totalitarian goals, and how he managed to avoid being overthrown by the civilians and maintain his position of power.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The totalitarian state Stalin had built in Russia employed all of the devised methods of control and persuasion. He monitored everything from telephone lies, mail and use informers everywhere. Not only that, he eliminates people who opposed him and threatened his right in both the masses and the members of the Communist party. He even resorted to replaying religion with communistic ideals. He spread propaganda attacking the church and set up museums of atheism that shows peoples religious belief were merely superstition (Totalitarianism: Case Study 1).…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin's Russia

    • 3633 Words
    • 15 Pages

    * Well known he disagreed with Lenin on theoretical issues in 1916, showed not true Leninist…

    • 3633 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The controversies that occurred during the Stalin era are key to the reputation held by Stalin and the myths surrounding him. A ‘cult of personality’ was created in the late 1920s and by the beginning of the 1930s, as historian Moshe Lewin puts it, ‘Stalin actually became the system’ (Lewin,…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin was a great leader, known for his superior leadership and ruthless acts. Stalin led his people and country by fear. Under his leadership, many people were put to death due to political and cultural reasons. The methods Stalin used were fear-based. He strongly believed that fear was necessary in order to accomplish his vision of Russia’s vision. Under his orders during WW2, he ordered to search war zones and adjacent areas thoroughly for deserters or malingerers, and had them executed.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis of Sources

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The value of this book lies in the analysis of Stalin’s personal archives which illustrate Stalin’s role in the power struggle from a critical perspective. This allows me to appreciate the importance of Stalin’s meticulous strategies in the power struggle as opposed to simply the position of general secretary he held in the party. Radzinsky suggests that Stalin was a calculating and ruthless man and…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although that is the case, Stalin’s leadership demonstrated the death of freedom that individuals had. For instance, the state directed people on what they could and could not read, listen, or watch. The media was under the control of the state. This meant that the society was informed of only what had been approved. The press printed what it was advised to print; strict sanctions were imposed on those who sought to go against what the state wanted. For instance, labor camps were established to act as prisons for those who defied the state (Holloway, Naimark, & Dallin, 1996). In these camps, individuals were subjected to hard labor, and some nearly died following the torture that they were subjected to. This was Stalin’s way of making his people known that he was in leadership. His actions were contrary to what the concept of communism…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Totalitarianism

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In a totalitarian authority, there is an evident indication of a dominant leader and a one-party state. There is also the presence of brutal crushing of internal opposition. “The state not only monopolized the instrumentalities of coercion but also dominated the means of mass communication;”3 totalitarianism allows “no challenge to the single official ideology.”4 Those who actually publicly oppose the leader are then faced with brutal suppression. The period during Stalin’s reign was perhaps the most transformative period of Soviet history. He consolidated his grip on power and used this to actively transform the culture and economic policies of the time. It was during industrialization that the Soviet Union became truly totalitarian.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's Essay

    • 2454 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After becoming the leader of Russia, a country which was struggling, Stalin stated that Russia ‘was 50 to 100 years behind advanced countries’ Stalin knew that he had to modernise Russia and fast, or they may face the reality of ‘being crushed by his opponents.’ To make up the vast difference between the agrarian countries he had, and the superpower he dreamt about. Stalin decided to use every method available to him, often these methods would include force and destruction, however he found this necessary in order to make Russia a superpower. He needed improve the agricultural system, rapidly increase Russia’s industry and change the soviet people’s social and political ways of life. Despite the pain which Stalin put the Russian people through, it was acceptable as if not for the vast changes which Stalin put into place Russia would have been destroyed by its enemies.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays