Joseph Stalin's Leadership Analysis

Although that is the case, Stalin’s leadership demonstrated the death of freedom that individuals had. For instance, the state directed people on what they could and could not read, listen, or watch. The media was under the control of the state. This meant that the society was informed of only what had been approved. The press printed what it was advised to print; strict sanctions were imposed on those who sought to go against what the state wanted. For instance, labor camps were established to act as prisons for those who defied the state (Holloway, Naimark, & Dallin, 1996). In these camps, individuals were subjected to hard labor, and some nearly died following the torture that they were subjected to. This was Stalin’s way of making his people known that he was in leadership. His actions were contrary to what the concept of communism
During that time, family politics were easier to solve as divorce was quite easy. However, when Stalin took over the leadership, he came with a rule that prevented the flexibility of women as well as hindering the likelihood of a divorce taking place. The communist party under Stalin set up policies that led to the promotion of increased levels of infidelity in the society. Many children were born out of wedlock as spouses knew that they could not be easily divorced. Any act that was against Stalin’s polices on marriage was seen as a criminal offence which demanded severe punishment (Daniels, 2007). The emphasis put on family was meant to change the structure of the society into one that promoted togetherness. However, the approach was not as effective as one would have expected. Stalin probably thought that Lenin was lenient in his leadership as a representative of the communist ideology. Stalin’s policies could not cater for such a huge population, and this brought about serious economic issues to the