Task:
Research the factors that led to Stalin’s victory in the power struggle for leadership of the USSR after Lenin’s death:
a. Alliances
b. Use of Lenin’s work
c. Stalin’s position in the party
Explain which one you think is the most significant factor.
Alliances
Alliances performed an extremely important role in the leadership struggle. First, the alliances allowed Stalin to stay in the background while the other contenders fought each other in public. In 1924, it was Zinoviev and Kamenev who openly battled with Trotsky, while in 1927, it was Bukharin who spoke out against the United Opposition. In this way, Stalin avoided himself from unimportant quarreling and increased the respect of the party. Secondly, the alliances allowed Stalin to deal with his opponents in turn: in 1924, the Triumvirate was able to defeat Trotsky; in 1927, The Duumvirate dealt with Zinoviev and Kamenev. Finally, Stalin’s alliances allowed him to maintain a majority support in the Politburo and because of this, Stalin was always part of the government and never associated with an opposition group.
Use of Lenin’s Work
Stalin’s command would prove one of the goriest recorded in history. Famine and fear killed millions of people; in addition, millions more found themselves committed to imprisonment in the horrifying Siberian gulags (the punishing system of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics consisting of a network of labor camps). Subsequently, when the Soviet Union revealed crimes made by Stalin in the 1950s, the officials claimed that he had corrupted Leninism; he had betrayed Lenin’s initial vision of a communist utopia. However, these declarations contained little truth: while Lenin disregarded Stalin at the end of his life, Stalin endured a fairly faithful disciple of the Soviet Union’s founder. The terrors, assassinations and deprivations of the 1930s were purely served to build on and intensify what Lenin had initiated during the Revolution. Lenin and Stalin brutally discharged the peasantry; both confined their political enemies in deliberation camps and both created large- scale famines. Lenin had organized an obscure and bloody path to Stalin's succeeding terrors.
After Lenin’s death, the Soviet Union held up Lenin’s writings as works of logical prodigy, however this glorification comprised nothing more than empty publicity, all down to the fact that Lenin wasn’t a great intellectual. Although, more than anyone else, Lenin laid the foundations for a state so rough that it would withstand for seventy years and be so powerful that it would ultimately challenge the United States for world supremacy. It is this achievement that protected Lenin’s place among the most significant figures of the century. But significance isn’t the same as greatness. Lenin possessed, and acted upon, a great vision:
He was an optimist; he seemed, more than Stalin, to have truthfully believed in the requirement of the Revolution to purify Russia of the evils of Tsardom and draining poverty.
Like his brother Alexander, whose death set him on the road to discrimination, he noticed that his country, and the world as a whole, contained clear flaws and injustices. However, when it came to actually alleviating these flaws and building his own utopia, Lenin keenly turned to murder, terror, and brutal domination. Having forsaken religion as a young man, he quickly renounced all philosophies of decency as well, calling it "bourgeois"; from his point of view, and from that of all the Bolsheviks, the ends justified the means. They were convinced that when Marx's "scientific" estimates of revolution came true, their bloody actions would find vindication. But history has not been so kind–to the Bolsheviks or their victims.
Stalin’s Position in the Party
When Lenin died in 1924, everybody was convinced that the adept leader of the Red Army, Trotsky, would become leader. This was thought acknowledging the contents of Lenin’s testament and what was said about Stalin. Below are two separate paragraphs that I’ve chosen as my evidence to prove my point:
“Comrade Stalin, having become Secretary-General, has unlimited authority concentrated in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution.”
“Stalin is too coarse and this defect, although quite tolerable in our midst and in dealing among us Communists, becomes intolerable in a Secretary-General. That is why I suggest that the comrades think about a way of removing Stalin from that post and appointing another man in his stead who in all other respects differs from Comrade Stalin in having only one advantage, namely, that of being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious, etc.”
From these two sources, it is easy to understand that Lenin didn’t have a positive opinion about Stalin and wanted to encourage the other members to vote him out. However, in the end, Stalin took power with the aid of his position within the party. He had several positions including being the General Secretary of the party, Head of Central Control Commission and Head of the Workers’ and Peasants’ inspectorate. These positions intended to limit his power acknowledging the fact that it was only a party position and not a government position. Nevertheless, Stalin realized that it gave him the authority to attain information on party members, promote and demote people and to expel those who opposed the party, or appeared to oppose him. Those he promoted were those who were loyal to him, and those he demoted were those who were loyal to Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and his other rivals. This helped to increase his popularity in the party because he won the hearts of those who originally liked him and so this allowed him to have a stronger chance of getting the power he desired. Russia was not a democracy so popularity amongst the people was irrelevant.
Stalin’s intelligence gathering, initially logging party members’ associates and their attitudes on different political issues, grew into active intelligence gathering – Phone taps, apartments bugged, etc. The fear of Stalin grew in proportion to his power, so people were reluctant to speak about anything that may get back to the Vozhd. Politburo colleagues knew Vozhd as the boss.
After growing up in Georgia, Stalin conducted activities for the Bolshevik (Communist) party for twelve years before the Russian Revolution of 1917. After participating, Stalin took military leadership positions in the Russian Civil War and Soviet-Polish War. Stalin was one of the Bolsheviks' chief technicians in the Caucasus and grew very close to Lenin, who saw him as a capable and loyal follower. Stalin played a decisive role in engineering the 1921 Red Army invasion of Georgia, embracing a particularly hardline approach to opposition. His connections helped him attain high positions in the new Soviet government, eventually becoming General Secretary in 1922. Lenin grew critical of Stalin, and many other Bolsheviks at this time, but in 1922 a stroke forced Lenin into semi-retirement. After Lenin's death in 1924, Stalin overpowered documentation of Lenin's recommendation. Thereafter, Stalin politically isolated his major enemies, such as archrival Trotsky, and had them dismissed from government altogether. This eventually led him to be the sole uncontested leader of the Party and the Soviet Union.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The first reason is that Stalin, Bukharin, Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had different ideologies which contradicted each other, the rules and the practices that Lenin already had in place. Trotsky represented the left wing of the party and believed in the rejection of the New Economic Party, being committed to immediate industrialisation and permanent revolution which was completely different to Bukharin who was on the right wing of the party. Bukharin believed in acceptance of the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation but in the distant future and wanted socialism in one country. On the other hand, Stalin was in the centre which meant that he had a pragmatic commitment to the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation in the near future and socialism should be in one country, which are both similar to Bukharin’s ideas on the right wing. Zinoviev and Kamenev swapped from right to left in 1925, which lost them credibility with the party. The fact that most of the contenders had such different ideas about how to run the country would have caused a struggle because they would not have been able to agree on something between them and would have been competing…
- 1472 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In some ways the weaknesses of the left wing were responsible for Stalin’s victory, however, there were other factors that influenced his victory also.…
- 882 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…
- 199 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Lenin’s death in 1924 not only created a power vacuum but also a bitter struggle for supremacy between Stalin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Bukharin as each tried to become the new leader of the communist party. Whilst I do think that the personalities of the combatants were noteworthy I believe that the other elements involved such as Stalin’s tactical skill, the debate over permanent Revolution and socialism in one country, and powerbases held by the aforementioned contenders all contributed equally to Stalin’s ultimate triumph .…
- 1502 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…
- 680 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Even though Stalin’s victory in the power struggle was partly due to his popular policies, it was not just this that allowed Stalin also because of the mistakes made by other rivals and factors that played into his hands. For example Trotsky was a former menshevik which helped Stalin accuse him of not been a true Bolshevik.…
- 885 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The concept of Stalinism, being the ideologies and policies adopted by Stalin, including centralization, totalitarianism and communism, impacted, to an extent, on the soviet state until 1941. After competing with prominent Bolshevik party members Stalin emerged as the sole leader of the party in 1929. From this moment, Stalinism pervaded every level of society. Despite the hindrance caused by the bureaucracy, the impact of Stalinism was achieved through the implementation of collectivization and the 5-year plans, Stalin’s Political domination and Cultural influence, including the ‘Cult of the Personality’. This therefore depicts the influence of Stalinism over the Soviet State in the period up to 1941.…
- 1040 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the lead up to Lenin’s death and the years that followed, it would seem Stalin was in a weaker position than several of his opponents, as many doubted his role in the Revolution and, therefore, his role as a leader of the Party. Several factors played a role in allowing Stalin to be victorious, however, comparatively they hold varying significance. Despite the odds appearing to be stacked against him, Stalin’s ruthless personality and devious strategies allowed him to tactfully defeat his opponents, by manipulating his position within the Party, without having any real party appeal or Government powerbase and he ultimately emerged as leader of the Party in 1929, ending the leadership struggle.…
- 1220 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The aim of this investigation is to assess how the purges of 1934-38 helped Stalin preserve his power in the Soviet Union. In order to evaluate this, the investigation assesses Stalin’s role in relation to the purges, as well as their purpose. An analysis of this should indicate the extent to which the purges were successful, and their contribution to Stalin’s power. In the section entitled Evaluation of Sources, two sources used for this investigation (The Great Terror: A Reassessment, and Origins of the great purges: the Soviet Communist Party reconsidered, 1933-1938) are evaluated according to their values, limitations, origins, and purposes.…
- 1516 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
(a) How significant was Lenin’s leadership in the Bolshevik consolidation of power in the period to 1924?…
- 619 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Stalin was so obsessed with the idea that people were trying to destroy him and his government that any accidents or errors of the doubters were considered intentional sabotage. People with foreign sounding names were also accused of being foreign spies. As a result of so many purges, the people of Russia feared the government and recognized Stalin’s power, which is what he wanted. Some of the Russians that Stalin had killed were even devoted to Bolshevism. Throughout Stalin’s time as leader, failure increased, mostly due to him killing so many citizens. When Stalin was not accusing people within Russia though, he blamed any of Russia’s agricultural, industrial, or construction failures on his opposers outside of Russia. In addition, there were no limits on the blood purges. Therefore the blood purges victimized around 1.5 million people and killed 680,000 people in 1937-1938 (time period of the Great Purge). “About 100,000 Party members (from Stalin’s government) were arrested, often tortured to confess concocted charges, and sent to concentration camps” (The Great Purges 5). In the end however, the purges did not succeed in eliminating Russia of the problems it was supposed to (The Great Purge 1, 4, and 5).…
- 336 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
To what extent did Stalin’s rule mar the key turning point in Russia’s political development 1856-1953?…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Gulags were every one 's worst nightmare, someone could be sent there for years just for stealing a loaf of bread, when the first Gulag was made in 1919 to when Stalin died in 1953 there were 50 million people that died in the Gulags (“Videofact”), because of what happened this made Stalin one of the most feared dictators ever.…
- 1409 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…
- 1843 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays