Sociology

Journal of Politics and Law; Vol. 5, No. 4; 2012
ISSN 1913-9047
E-ISSN 1913-9055
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

A Critique on Feminist Research Methodology
Basharat Hussain1 & Amir Zada Asad1
1

Institute of Social Work, Sociology and Gender Studies, University of Peshawar, Pakistan

Correspondence: Basharat Hussain, Institute of Social Work, Sociology and Gender Studies, University of
Peshawar, Pakistan. E-mail: [e-mail]
Received: September 12, 2012 doi:10.5539/jpl.v5n4p202 Accepted: October 25, 2012

Online Published: November 29, 2012

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v5n4p202

Abstract
In almost all advanced countries of the world, the discourse about the existence or other wise of a feminist research methodology has been live at least for the last few decades. There are argument in favour of and against the existence of such a methodology to be called “Feminist” and its validity. This article criticizes the arguments made by feminist research methodology and maintains that these claims do not establish it as a coherent and cogent mode of inquiry distinct from other non-feminist research methods.
Keywords: feminist research, gender, women’s empowerment, qualitative research, women experiences
1. Introduction
Feminism refers to the belief and claim that women should have the same rights, powers and opportunities as men. Feminist approach argues that women suffer more than men, are more poor than men and are discriminated in all welfare policies. Based on these assumptions feminists argue that women are not truly represented in studies and researches and are pursuing a distinct methodology of research they call it ‘Feminist’. They claim to have specialized research methods and techniques but the opponent say these methods of research already existed and were in vogue and have nothing to do with feminists.
The feminists have long been trying to answer the question of ‘what constitutes

References: Du Bois, B. (1983). Passionate Scholarship: notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social research. In Bowles, G., & Duelli, K Gelsthorpe, L. (1992). Response to Martyne Hamersley’s Paper on Feminist Methodology. Sociology, 26(2), 213-218 (1992). Harding, S. (1987). Is there a Feminist Method? In Harding, S. (Ed.), Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Landman, M. (2006). Getting Quality in Qualitative Research: A Short Introduction to Feminist Methodology and Methods Lather, P. (1988). Feminist Perspective on Empowering Research Methodologies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(6), 569-581 Maguire, P. (1987). Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts. Maynard, M. (1994). Methods, Practice and Epistemology: The Debate about Feminism and Research. In Maynard, M., & Purvis, J Mies, M. (1983). Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research. In Bowles, & Duelli, K. (Eds.), Theories of women studies Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing Women: a contradiction in terms. In Roberts (Ed.), Doing Feminist Research. Ramazanoglu, C. (1992). On Feminist Methodology: Male Reason versus Female Empowerment. Sociology, 26(2), 207-212 Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press. Smith, D. E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: a feminist sociology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Williams, A. (1993). Diversity and Agreement in Feminist Ethnography. Sociology, 27(4), 575-589.