Preview

Slavery and the Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
301 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Slavery and the Constitution
Alexis Hishaw
11/01/2013
US History 2111
Prof. Geeter

Slavery and the Constitution

During the late 1700s and early 1800s, the country of America was in for a rude awakening. This was a time for war and change. Most of our American pioneers were fighting for two freedoms. Though many of our founding fathers saw nothing wrong with slavery, leaders such as Thomas Jefferson related the incident as immoral. With the Constitution being first drafted, slavery still existed and only a few states had exempt been from it. Nonetheless the Constitution still served and serves today as a document to support the American life.
The drafted version of the Constitution molded how the country should be run by its people. Meanwhile America wanted a solid government African Americans were striving for their own rights. They fought in wars for the incentive of freedom and even then this agreement was not being acknowledged. Many slave owners thought African Americans were too incompetent or were much too similar to savages and there would be no way they could coexist together. The Three-Fifths compromise stated that every slave would be counted for three-fifths of a person for tax purposes. The delegates sought to count a slave as a whole person because it would give slave owners more power in the Electoral College since slave were not permitted to vote.
The Constitution also implies slavery in other areas. In Article 1, Section 9, Congress is not allowed to stop the "Importation" of slaves, before 1808. The slave trade was thought to help the economy and thus without it, plantations owners would be at risk of losing their property.
The draft of the Constitution was definitely faulty and it did not work in the favor of African Americans but it did open the door to many rights we have and know today.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the time of the Civil War, I personally believe the Constitution supported slavery more than it did to oppose it. The opposition of slavery existed, in some forms, among supporters of the Constitution. It seems few though were willing to risk the union for it. The slave states were aware of this and used it as a power in the Convention. In a way, it seemed it was a threat to break up the union. The slave states made it clear that their support for the Constitution was dependent on the absence of any apparent threats it brought to slavery. The slaves were considered property and the constitution protected that. By allowing southern states to count each slave as 3/5’s a person, but also not giving slaves the right to vote, guaranteed that…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economics of the northern and southern United States in the mid 1800's were complete opposites of each other. The North was primarily industrialistic, relying on the manufacturing of goods, at the time generally cotton textiles, as it's economic driving force. This was due primarily to the fact that The North had poor growing conditions including infertile soil. The South on the other hand had a warm climate, and fertile soil. This resulted in agriculture and generally the growing of cotton to be the South's economic driving force. The farming economy of the South resulted in slavery being used as an efficient source of labor. The issue of slavery was the main and basic driving force of the sectional tensions that drove the Union apart. The Constitution had very little effect or influence on the development of the Nation's economy. Since slavery was introduced into the South because of it's economic style, logically the Constitution cannot be blamed as a cause of slavery or the sectional differences that resulted because of slavery. In fact the Panic of 1857 helped to reveal the differences in economies and helped further sectional…

    • 1469 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain Northerners were against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C). This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the United States.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitution allowed slavery to continue although the declaration of independence claimed “all men were free” , because of every one different opinions and racism.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Fifth Compromises

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ’s right. We know today’s constitution is changed many times, so some way is different with the original constitution. In the original constitution some ways did address slavery but some aspects not mentioned. “Three Fifth compromises” is a clause about the slavery. This clause made slave counted to three fifth human when the voting.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The only reason the 13th amendment came to be was because the Civil War broke slaveries stronghold over politics and constitutional development. In 1787 the constitution always was protecting slavery. The document did not say the word slavery, but everyone knew what it meant. The Civil War helped slavery…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is said that the roots of the Civil War, which was fought, no matter the other theories, over the big problem of slavery, were implanted in the compromises of the Constitution on the controversy. That is likely to be true. Slavery, which began in cruelty and disorder in the kidnapping, shipping, and exchange of human capital, unfortunately required violence to eventually put a stop to it. After the travesty of the Revolutionary War and the strife in the U.S. because of the Articles, a moment of reconciliation and reconstruction was necessary to make the nation strong enough to a place where it could endure a civil war. The biggest misfortune is that in the almost 100 years from the start of the Revolutionary War and the ending of the Civil…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of slavery to paradoxically define American freedom is first shown by the use of Jefferson, the “slaveholding spokesman of freedom”(Morgan). His attitude toward slavery can be shown in two ways. The first of which is debt. Debt is a force that can hold down any free man and this was why Jefferson hated debt so much. As a planter, he was basically forced into debt and resisted giving up his slaves until he found his freedom from that debt. He did not care about the freedom of his slavery as he did for his own. Jefferson also stated that a nation would be very fertile for tyranny if the men of a nation did not have enough land or money to support their families. This is paradoxical because the slaves live in a world of tyranny where the master is there monarch and the slave has no land or money to support their families. His second dislike was artisans. He stated that they lived dependent lives because they were dependent on the customer and had no other business or land to fall back on. Jefferson, on the other hand, liked farmers because they were very independent and always had a source of income. Jefferson states “the man who depended on another for his loving could never be truly free” (Morgan). This shows that Jefferson is willing to fight for the artisans who are dependent but does not want to forgo his slaves. Although freedom was rising for those who were dependent on others, the same dependent slaves had no improvements in liberty.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution stated “all other persons” would not be identified as slaves. Ultimately it was a unanimous decision between the North and the South. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a highly debatable issue for the reason being delegates were faced on how to count slaves for representational purposes. Although not all states permitted slavery, despite slavery being legal. They believed it would be inequitable for those states in particular.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “What I do say is, that no man is good enough to govern another man, without that other consent.” - Abraham Lincoln. The man who said this quote was Abraham Lincoln, and he believed that slavery was wrong. He was born on February 12th, 1809 in Hodgenville Kentucky, and eventually became the 16th president of the United States of America. During his presidency, he led us through a Civil War. Way before Lincoln was born, slavery was in America. It began first when African slaves were sent over to Jamestown, Virginia. When Lincoln was alive, he did things to try to stop slavery like making Emancipation Proclamation and documents similar, saying speeches to sway people's minds and making people think more about the Civil War as for slavery, which…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In a sense, it technically made slavery legal. According to our textbook, “The Constitution gave the federal government the right to abolish the international slave trade but no authority to regulate or destroy the institution where it existed under slave law” (Brands 312). Our Founding Fathers thought that slavery was not supposed to be a permanent addition, but rather would become extinct on its own. Even during Colonial America, “there is not one single law which recognizes the rightfulness of slavery in the abstract” (Darling 11). The constitution stated slaves would be returned to their owners, but with the North believing slavery was unethical, they refused to capture and return the slaves.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Slavery and the Making of America." PBS. PBS, 1 Jan. 2004. Web. 24 Nov. 2014. <http://www.pbs.org/wnet/slavery/index.html>.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the year 1780 through approximately 1815 many people in the United States were at war. While so many people were fighting for their independence the African Americans were fighting for their own freedom and independence from slavery, while being forced to fight for others freedom at the same time. Even the freed African Americans fought long and hard for their loved ones that had fallen victim to slavery. While so many people in the southern states and very few in the north were still for slavery many were hell bent against it.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthony Iaccarino states in The Founding Fathers and Slavery “Although many of the Founding Fathers acknowledged that slavery violated the core American Revolutionary ideal of liberty, their simultaneous commitment to private property rights, principles of limited government, and intersectional harmony prevented them from making a bold move against slavery.” Meaning that many of the founding fathers who owned slaves believed that slavery was wrong and did not follow the constitutional ideas. They just didn't know how to end slavery with the resources they had or were limited to. Thomas Jefferson, along with many other Founding Fathers, was a slave owner, however he thought slavery was morally wrong and an injustice to African Americans.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays