We are trying to get a better relationship with the countries we give the most money to. “Washington doles out aid primarily based on calculations about how to advance U.S. strategic interests rather than assessments of pure need, which is why Afghanistan, Israel, and Pakistan top the list of aid recipients rather than Burundi, …show more content…
We give the most money to Muslim countries, yet they still don’t like us. “Out of the top six U.S. foreign aid recipients, five of them were Muslim countries. And yet it seems the U.S. can’t buy good press in the Middle East” (Forbes). It seems like we’ll never have a good relationship with the Middle-East. “The UN boasts 193 members, and the U.S. provided economic assistance to 184 of them, or 96% of the countries in the world” (Forbes). You would think that with us giving money to almost every country in the world, that everybody should like us, but that isn’t the …show more content…
“These countries receive a ton of “foreign assistance,” or direct cash grants from various U.S. government-backed programs like USAID. In most cases, they receive much more than their pro-U.S. counterparts” (Walsh). This article states, yet again, how we give more money to countries that don’t like us. “The countries with the highest percentage of citizens who consider the U.S. an “enemy” include several NATO partners like Turkey and Greece, as well as major non-NATO strategic allies like Pakistan, Jordan, Egypt and Argentina” (Walsh). This seems like it is reversed as to how it should be, how the citizens don’t like us, but we’re allied with them. “And, in the world of foreign relations anyway, if you’re trying to turn your enemies into friends, it’s standard practice to throw money at them” (Walsh). This is exactly what the U.S. is doing to try to become allies or neutral with these