SHOULD SCHOOLBOYS BE ALLOWED TO HAVE LONG HAIR?
With the development of society, people's lives have undergone tremendous changes in many aspects. New lifestyle, new ideas and new culture impact on the manner of thinking. As the forefront of the times, the young people are the leader and follower of the trend. An increasing number of young people challenge the traditional dress code by wearing the personality clothes. For example, they often wear broken jeans rather than wearing the suits; the girls like their hair dyed colors to highlight the personality rather than to be a good girl in family; boys have begun to wear earring and have long hair to make them different. Facing of these changes, many people can not accept, especially the elderly. They think that these behaviors break the social ethics, and corrupt the social morality. But a growing number of people have started to understand this phenomenon from different perspectives. In this essay, I will focus on one aspect - should boys are allowed to stay long hair? In my opinion, schoolboys also can have long hair like girls, and the school has not the right to interfere. But some people insist opposite idea that it is not right of schoolboys to have long hair. So firstly I will introduce their basic standpoints, then I shall refute these ideas one by one according to gave my reasons and some examples.
Actually, in modern times, people formed a traditional aesthetic standards. It is the male should have a short hair, while long hair is the exclusive preserve of women. Short hair for men is even more dynamic、spirit and clean. When seeing a long-haired man, it will be the first impression that he is not a good man because it is a violation of this standard. In the eyes of the vast majority of Chinese people, long hair is generally regards as the sign of those frustrated writers and lonely artists. From the beginning of the 19th century, many counties ban the male to have long hair by various of ways, including soft ways and strong ways. (Guo Chun-lin et al 2007) said, in China's history, each dynasty had its stories related to hair. It seems that since Ming and Qing Dynasty, China's politics has been tied to the hair more tightly. The hair even became the complex of the nationality which couldn't be explained easily. Take china for example, many male cut his long hair to indicate that they support science and democracy, when the democracy revolution over threw Qing government.
Another, some school officers said student should pay attention to his instrument. Many schools have made many provisions in this area: girls do not dye hair, and are not allowed to wear strange clothing; boys may not stay long hair, even girls must also stay short hair in some schools. They believe the rule makes the school more normalization. As a part of school, student should observe these rules of school. In other hand, teachers are worried that students spend too much time in their appearance, instead of paying attention in studying. It is bad for student to emphasis on external beauty while ignoring the training of the intrinsic quality.
But, as a younger, I do not agree with the above ideas. I will give three reasons to support my standpoint. Firstly, as we all know the history of the world, in the ancient day males always have long hair, such as the gentlemen in 18th century of France and England and the people in the old dynasties of China. They think the long hair make themselves more handsome. Handsome looks leads to greater confidence. Another it makes them appear different and standout. For example, people identity and image and expressing their personality creativity by the style of his hair. At last, the length of hair also stands for power and status in some countries and areas. In China, depending on the change of age and social rank, the style of hair is different. So it is wrong that some people have some the prejudice on schoolboys who wear...
References: Guo Chun-lin. et al. (2007). Stories of Hair-the Politics of Body. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section).
Iozzi, L. et al. (1998). What Research Says to the Educator, Part Two: Environmental Education and the Affective Domain. Journal of Environmental Education.
John, Stuart, Mill. (1978). On liberary. Elizabeth Rapaport Hackett publish Company incindianapolis. Cambridge.
Maccrate, Robert, (1997). Educating a changing profession: from clinic to continuum. 64 Tenn. L. Rev, 1099.
Pillip, G. and Wagner, C. (2003). School culture assessment. Vancouver, British Columba: Agent 5 Design.
�PAGE � �PAGE �1�
Please join StudyMode to read the full document