Scenario One Reflection Paper
Pat Anthony, Regina Campbell, Makisha Keith and Marcela Rivera Learning Team B
University of Phoenix
Foundations of Problem-Based Learning
Dr. James Booker III, PhD.
May 15, 2006
While problem-solving is an almost universal aspect of life, very few individuals follow a structured approach to solving problems. The 9-Step Problem-Solving Model used in the USAuto and AutoMex scenario can be described as a sequential, step-by-step procedure. While this makes for easy description, there is, in fact, no simple plan that represents the universal problem-solving process. Any process one may apply in the workplace or in ones personal life must be flexible enough to accommodate different work styles, unexpected discoveries and disappointments, and inevitable fluctuations in effort and creativity (Couger, 1995). The objective of this paper is to convey the thoughts and opinions expressed by Learning Team B on the 9-Step Problem-Solving Model to what we have learned in the exploration of the 9-Step Problem-Solving Model, why the model was effective in the case of the USAuto and AutoMex scenario, what challenges were identified and ways to overcome those challenges as we use the model in the future, how we would apply the model when solving problems in our workplace, and what factors we would need to consider when applying the model to those problems (Course Syllabus, p. 19). Problem-solving is a fundamental skill needed by today's managers. With recent research and exploration of problem-solving techniques, changing professional standards, new workplace demands, and recent changes in the economy, this has encouraged managers to use a higher order thinking skill, and in particular, problem-solving skills (Kirkley, 2003). Exploration of the 9-Step Problem-Solving Model
When the team discussed what we had learned so far in our exploration of the 9-Step Problem-Solving Model we determined that any successful problem-solving process begins with recognition of a problem and ends with implementation of a proposed solution. All the work that is between these two steps is the problem-solving process (Learning Team B, 2006). Effective use of the 9-Step Problem-Solving Model will enable future and present leaders to define the right problem, decide upon a wise solution, and avoid many of the de-railers of leadership. The 9-Step Problem-Solving Model is a set of steps which allow the user to perceive and resolve a gap between a present situation and a desired goal blocked by known or unknown obstacles. In general, the situation is one not previously encountered, or where at least a specific solution from past experiences is not known (Problem-Solving Based Scenarios, n.d.). The 9-Step Problem-Solving Model is not like most models of problem-solving and decision-making; the 9-Step Problem-Solving Model incorporates additional components to traditional approaches of solving problems. Most models of problem-solving include from 4 to 6 steps (Couger, 1995), whereas the 9-step model incorporates 9 distinct steps; where appreciative inquiry, defines success in terms of the desired future end-states, and involves engaging people throughout the process are components normally not addressed in other models (Problem-Solving Based Scenarios, n.d.). Use of the problem-solving model enabled the USAuto and AutoMex executives to understand the challenges of meeting their goals and objectives, the model ensured that continuous collection and evaluation of facts lead to alternatives and opportunities. Further exploration of the 9-Step Problem-Solving Model revealed the effectiveness when used for the USAuto and AutoMex scenario. It allowed both companies to frame the right problem, identify challenges and opportunities, analyze the risks, offer alternative solutions and conclude the best solution that would benefit both companies and realize a win-win relationship.
Effectiveness of the...
References: Adams, J. L. (2001). Conceptual blockbusting. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bruce, D. (July-October, 2005). Practical guide to leadership development. Training Media Review 13(4-5), 2-4.
Couger, J. D. (1995). Creative problem solving and opportunity finding. Danvers, MA:Boyd & Fraser.
Kolstoe, J. (1985). Consultation. [Electronic version]. Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 65-70. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://www.coursework.info/
Galinsky, D., Maddux, W.W., & Ku, g
Stice, J. (Ed.) (2005). Developing critical thinking and problem-solving abilities (Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
University of Phoenix. (2006). MBA/500 Course syllabus foundations of problem based learning online. Retrieved, April 12, 2006, from Outlook Express MBAGM.04-11.MBAF03RJR1-MBA500.Course-Materials Newsgroup.
University of Phoenix
University of Phoenix. (2006). MBA/500 Learning Team B (Marcela Rivera, Regina Campbell, Makisha Keith, & Pat Anthony). Retrieved, May 11, 2006, from Outlook Express MBAGM.04-11.MBAF03RJR1-MBA500.Learning Team B Newsgroup.
University of Phoenix
University of Phoenix. (Ed.). (2006). Sample Problem Solution Worksheet. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from University of Phoenix, rEsource, MBA/500 – Foundations of Problem Based Learning Web site: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resource.asp
Please join StudyMode to read the full document