Policy Paper on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Randy Ibrahim [SID: 860866350] Business 102 December 09, 2010 Dr. Sean D. Jasso
Ibrahim 2 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………3 History of the Act………………………………………………………………………...4 Corporate Scandals……………………………………………………………….4 Loss of Investor Confidence……………………………………………………..4 Market Failure and Government Intervention…………………….……………..5 Why Sarbanes-Oxley was Necessary…………………………………………….5 Implementing Sarbanes-Oxley…………………………………………………………...6 Title I-XI……………………………………………………………………....6-11 Impact on Business and Society………………………………………………………...11 Impact on Business……………………………………………………………...11 Impact on Society……………………………………………………………….12 Policy Analysis………………………………………………………………………….12 Did It Work?........................................................................................................12 Strengths and Weaknesses ……………………………………………………..13 Recommendations for Future Policy Makers..…………………………………14 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...14
Ibrahim 3 Introduction The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, is a federal law enacted in response to corporate and accounting scandals that led to bankruptcies and severe stock losses. Corrupt corporations, particularly Enron, WorldCom and Tyco, were acting unethical by committing accounting errors and fraudulent practices by management which led to scandals in 2001. The scandals impacted investors, who lost billions of dollars when the stock prices plummeted, and the public lost confidence in the capital markets. The main supporters of the law are Representative Michael Oxley and Senator Paul Sarbanes, both who combined their respective law to form the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The goal was to improve the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures. The law was quickly passed to correct the corporate scandals involving companies such as Tyco, WorldCom
References: Carroll, Archie. (2009). Business and society : ethics and stakeholder management. Mason, OH : South-Western Cengage Learning. De Kluyver, C. (2009). A primer on corporate governance. NY: Business Expert Press. Jasso, Sean. (2009). Sarbanes-Oxley – context & theory: market failure, information asymmetry & the case for regulation. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, Volume 9. LexisNexis. (2006). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. Nelson, Edward. (2007). The impact of Milton Friedman on modern monetary economics. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (2003). Accounting reform and investor protection Vol. 1. Washington : U.S. G.P.O. United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (2005). Implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 : hearings before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Washington : U.S. G.P.O. United States. Congress. House. Committee on Financial Services. (2005). The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Washington : U.S. G.P.O. United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on Ibrahim 19 Regulatory Affairs. (2006). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 4 years later : what have we learned? Washington : U.S. G.P.O. United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs. (2007). A balancing act : cost, compliance, and competitiveness after Sarbanes-Oxley. Washington : U.S. G.P.O. United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. (2007). Sarbanes-Oxley and small business : addressing proposed regulatory changes and their impact on capital markets. Washington : U.S. G.P.O.