Preview

Same Sex Couples: Marriage, Families, and Children

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Same Sex Couples: Marriage, Families, and Children
Same Sex Couples: Marriage, Families, and Children

In deciding who should be entitled to marry or have their marriages recognized, it is useful to consider current law regulating who may marry. Under California law:

Marriage is a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary....16

No particular form for the ceremony of marriage is required ... but the parties shall declare, in the presence of the person solemnizing the marriage and necessary witnesses, that they take each other as husband or wife.17

Thus, a man and a woman can legally marry if they receive a marriage license and go through a ceremony, presided over by a duly authorized official, at which each of them says that they take the other person to be their spouse. Nothing more is needed. The couple need not live together, sleep together, have children, or do anything jointly. Unless one of them takes an action to dissolve the marriage, or dies, they will remain husband and wife.

California law views marriage as a personal choice, belonging to the couple. The opportunity to marry is available to all people whom the state does not consider clearly unable to perform the functions that it is hoped that marriage will entail, even though it is recognized that many couples will not adequately perform these functions.

Thus, the only legal requirements for receiving a marriage license are that the applicants be a man and a woman, generally they must be over 18 years of age, they may not be closely related by blood, and they must not be already married.18 The age restrictions are designed to limit marriage to persons capable of understanding the obligations that are incurred by marrying. Rules barring marriage between closely related individuals reflect a desire to prevent abuses of power within family relationships; there is also a concern, perhaps not valid, that such unions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    States enjoy and expect the right to choose their own spouses. In the Hmong culture who you marriage…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the basic rights we hold sacred in this country is the freedom to marry whomever we choose. While that seems like a given in the US, because we don’t have the strict class hierarchy of Europe, or the arranged unions found in certain Eastern and African cultures that define who marries whom. We have had, and still do for that matter, rigid restrictions on marriage, when they seem counter-intuitive to social mores. When social feelings begin to shift towards a more progressive outlook, challenges to the status quo are bound to occur, especially when the emotionally charged aspect of marriage is involved. Two perfect examples are the cases of Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct1817(1967), and Goodridge v. Department of Public Health 440 Mass 309, 798 NE 2d 941(Mass.2003).…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marriage is forbidden between persons who are related within the prohibited degree of consanguinity or affinity. This is to say that a marriage cannot take place if the man and woman are blood relation in the direct ascendant or descendant line, or brother or sister of full or half blood, e.g. sister and brother, nephew and grandmother, grandfather and niece, grandfather and great-niece (Section 1450, Civil and Commercial Code).…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The freedom to marry is a fundamental right, it's an expression of emotional support and public commitment. The plantiffs, the gay and lesbian communiuty, argue that they deserve the "fundamental" right to marry their partner. The state of California wants to keep sexual activity withing marriages and because of Prop 8, same sex couples are permitted to engage in any sexual activity. However, same sex couples are allowed to adopt children. Plantiffs want to have the state recognize their relationships. The Equal Protection Law of the fourtheenth ammendment states that "no state deny any person within its jurisdiction." Evidence at the trial shows that marriage in the US traditionally…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lobbying Plan

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hollingsworth V. Perry

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marissa Bair Mr. Turcotte AP US History 6 December 2012 Hollingsworth v. Perry 1. In February of 2004 the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom and other city officials began distributing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples in the city of San Francisco, California. In March of the same year, the County of San Francisco ordered the halt of marriages, pending court review. On March 29th, the San Francisco Superior Court declared San Francisco’s issuing of same-sex marriage licenses illegal. Multiple state Supreme Court hearings were held on the legality of the same-sex marriages in the spring of 2004. San Francisco filed its own lawsuit against the state of California in order to have its case heard. In August, the state Supreme Court ruled the same-sex marriages performed in San Francisco violated authority and state law. The court deemed all same-sex marriages performed to be null. The next year, in March of 2005, Richard Kramer, the trial judge of In re Marriage Cases (2008) reported that California’s ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. They said marriage was a fundamental right that cannot be discriminated against based on sexual orientation. The next month, California legalized same-sex marriage on June 16th, 2008. Less than five months later, the marriages were stopped by the passing of Proposition 8, which provided that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid in recognized in California.” This overturned the California Supreme Court’s ruling of In re Marriage Case that same-sex couples have the constitutional right to marry. Same-sex marriages in California…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2000 the possibility of other states legalizing same sex marriage led to Prop 22 being passed, which restricted California from acknowledging the marriages of same sex couples from other states. The California Supreme Court overturned Prop 22 in May of 2008, and the court also mandated marriage licenses to be issued by judicial degree, and not by the will of the voters or the legislature. These licenses were not recognized by the federal government and most of the nation, but for that brief period in California same sex marriage was legal. The same sex couples that were married during that time are still considered married in California under the grandfather…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the book, Cultural Anthropology by Conrad Kottack, marriage is defined as: “a union between a man and a woman such that the children born to the woman are recognized as legitimate…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same sex marriage was not officially recognized by the United States until 2013, when the Supreme Court ruled that only legally recognizing marriage between a man and a woman was unconstitutional. However, five years earlier, in 2008, California made same-sex marriage legal within its geographic borders (Wikipedia).The California legalization of same-sex marriage today is very similar to its progressive history of adopting controversial legislation before the same legislation is adopted nation-wide.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    music

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. A big debate is raging in both the religious and political arenas regarding same sex marriages. Do you think that if people choose to be committed together, they are entitled to be recognized as a married couple? Why or why not? Answer: Yes. If people choose to be committed together, they should be entitled to be recognized as a married couple regardless if it’s a homosexual couple or a heterosexual couple. Homosexual couples are no different than heterosexual couples and, therefore, should have the right to marry and be legally considered a married couple.…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are able to marry whoever we wish, provided that they are not of the same gender.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law of the land recognizes the authority of states to license marriage. The majority of states, including Indiana, provide a marriage license only to a man and woman while nine states also allow same-sex couples to receive a license to marry.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the rise of a national discussion about marriage rights for same-sex couples, many straight friends and family members have been asking important questions about the issue. This section provides some basic answers to those questions, such as:…

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is an acknowledged sexual and economic union between two or more people. People usually make legal agreements to honour each…

    • 1247 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics