Preview

Robbers Cave Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
956 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Robbers Cave Experiment
Robbers Cave Experiment
Jamie Allen
Drake University

Abstract

Robbers Cave experiment was completed by Muzafer Sherif in order to question whether groups are able to work together for a common goal for the whole group. Muzafer showed us through 3 stages a) In group formation b) Friction phase c) integration stage. This experiment was made up of 22 Caucasian middle class boys who shared similar backgrounds coming from a two parent home and protestant background. The boys were complete strangers to one another. Through the experiments exercised you will see the outcome of different variables added to covey the studies purpose.

Theory Experiment The Robbers Cave experiment focused on a group of boys, how the groups are formed, and the hierarchies created within the group. Robbers cave also focused on what happens when the group comes into contact with other groups. The experiment added competition within in the group to discover a level of hierarchies in the group. Also the group conveyed a level of comradely within the group. The experiment divided the boys into 2 groups, in the beginning neither group knew the other group existed. The theory introduced the ideal of how groups deal with integration of another group with common goals. The In- group formation phase was used for the group to begin the bonding stage. The bonding between the boy’s help create an interrelation to one another. The group was also asked to label their group. Labeling helped the boy’s create an identity to help identify themselves with the group. The second phase is described as the Friction phase, at this point each group was able to acknowledge each group existed. During this time each group would engage in a series of competition that created a friction. There were prizes given to the group with the highest scores. This also led to the hierarches between the groups. The competition lasted for several days to build up a degree of frustration amongst the



References: Explorable.com [3] (Jun 25, 2010). Sherif’s Robbers Cave Experiment. Retrieved Mar 10, 2014 from Explorable.com: http://explorable.com/robbers-cave-experiment [4] Green, C. D. (n.d.). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Sherif/chap7.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Groups, like individuals are each unique with their own experiences and expectations. However many commentators studying group development and dynamics have…

    • 13259 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cave!" It was excavated originally in the 1930s by Harrington and then excavated twice more before being returned to for the final time in 1978 by David Hurst Thomas for a more in depth excavation.The site dates back to the early Desert Archaic Culture from c. 4000 to 2000 years ago.Thousands of Archaic artifacts have been found here, and the site provides important, if unusual clues about Desert Archaic lifeways.Hidden Cave was not lived in, but used as storage site for goods and tools for…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: A Class Divided

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Robbers Cave Experiment was conducted by Muzafer Sherif, who was a Turkish-American social psychologist. The Robbers Cave Experiment was known as the Realistic Conflict Theory which explained how intergroup hostility can arise as a result of conflicting goals and could resources. The experiment begins involving two groups of twelve-year-old boys which none of them knew of each other before however all of them shared similar backgrounds and they were all randomly signed one to two groups. Each group in the experiment went through team building exercise and they decide on a team name for themselves. One team named themselves the Eagles while the other team named themselves the Rattlers, there was in total 22 boys from the start of the experiment. For the first week of the experiment, everything was going smoothly however Sherif arranged the Competition Stage within the two group of boys, they became aware of each other and the experiment ended with everyone competing with one…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stage 1 is known as forming. The behaviour of each individual is driven by a desire to be accepted by the other group members. Conflict and controversial topics are avoided and team members focus on tasks at hand. Individuals are also gathering information and impressions about eachother. Although this is a comfortable stage to be in, the avoidance of conflict means not a lot of work gets done.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tom, Susie, Richard, Mark, and Betty are all part of an academic learning team at the University of Phoenix. This team is tasked with the responsibility of producing a 2,500-word paper on the topic of groupthink for their social psychology class. Tom, Susie, and Richard have been on several teams together (in previous classes), but Mark and Betty are newcomers to the group.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce Tuckman has a theory which contains of four stages; these are forming, storming, norming and performing. His theory is about group development. The first stage is forming, this is when a group is reliant on one particular leader, if the leader is not there and someone else tries to take charge then the confusion starts. The leader makes sure every individual is aware of their role, if the leader does not make them aware, then their roles and responsibilities are unclear. For example in a class room everyone will be speaking to each other, when the teacher comes in and tells everyone to settle down then they will do so. The second stage is storming, at this stage everyone hasn’t settled into a task, they are all busy chatting amongst their selves and deciding who should be in charge. Decisions don’t come easily within a group it takes some time to come to an agreement. You start to form your own cliques and groups. People in the group may challenge each other in order to come out on top. Being focused it top priority for every individual, concentrating on achieving their goals and not being distracted by relationships and emotional issues, to enable progress to be made you may have to compromise within the group members. The third stage is Norming, this is when all members of the group have come to agreement on their roles and have accepted their individual responsibilities. Big decisions are made amongst group agreement were as minor decisions may be given to individuals or small groups within the whole group. Within the group commitment is getting stronger and unity is made everyone has a clear picture of what is happening. Now all the problems are over fun and social activates can now take place within the group and the leader has now earned every members respect and trust. The last stage is performing, the team is more strategically aware; the team members know what they are doing and why they are doing so,…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second stage of group development is known as the storming stage. The storming stage is where the conflicts and competition are at its greatest. This happens because the team members have an understanding of the task and a general feel for who they are as a team and who group members are, they feel confident and begin to address some of the more important issues surrounding the group. Such issues can relate to things like the group’s tasks, individual roles and responsibilities or even with the team members themselves. They have different opinions on what should be done and how it should be done. Each team member wonders whether or not his or her ideas will be respected or not, so the team members compete with each other for status and…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    power struggles between the group and then they begin to develop norms, beliefs and values…

    • 3348 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay examines and explains how groups develop and function. Groups are a fundamental part of our lives from social to professional, from large to small, depending on their particular environment.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abstract:The Stanford experiment was performed by psychologists Craig Haney, W. CurtisBanks, and Philip Zimbardo. Their goal was to find out how humans deal with a position ofpower and a position of being powerless.. However, even though their experiment ended upwith great results, still, they were not able to finish it and the stanford prison experiment wasclosed after only 6 days. We reporformed the Stanford prison experiment that was done psychologists Craig. We broughtordinary college students and had some agree to be prisoners and the rest used as guards for theprisoners. We made sure to create a prison's environment where the prisoners were treated likenormal Criminals. We didn't train the guards and left them to use their normal behavior. whenfelt that they were given a power, the guards acted in such an abusive manner, on thefirst day of the experiment, prisoners were not completely into their roles and did not take thesituation too seriously. Starting on the second day, the prisoners started to rebell against thegaurds and against being in such an aggressive experiment. 6 out 25 prisoners chose to leave theexperiment. One of the prisoners wanted to leave but he later agreed to stay and acted as a snitchto get more information about the prisoners.The results of this studies make statements abouthuman nature and social psychology and illustrated the influence of deindividuation.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    group norms, just as the participants in the Loud and Proud study did, although Sherif…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let me tell you about a FASCINATING experiment in group psychology. I believe it was done at Boston University in the early 80s.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    12 Angry Men Groupthink

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This group of 12 men who did not know each other walked into the room to discuss this case, showed the first sign of groupthink, as they had already formed the perception of unanimity. Through the movie the group dynamics are on show with both the groupthink and group shift phenomena, the influencing…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conformity and Obedience

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In her essay "Group Minds," Doris Lessing discusses our paradoxical ability to call ourselves individuals and our inability to realize that groups define and influence us. We, as humans, hold individualism in the highest regard yet fail to realize that groups diminish our individuality. Lessing writes, "when we 're in a group, we tend to think as that group does... but we also find our thinking changing because we belong to a group" (p. 334). Groups have the tendency to generate norms, or standards for behavior in certain situations. Not following these norms can make you stand out and, therefore, groups have the ability to influence our thoughts and actions in ways that are consistent with the groups '. Lessing 's essay helps set the context to understand the experiments that social psychologists Solomon Asch, Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo conducted to explain conformity and obedience.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Loafing

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The common problem when working in a group is social loafing. “Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually.”(pg.299) The best way to discourage social loafers is limit the group size, holding each individual responsible for their part, and setting group goals. One of the common stereotypes about groups is that team work intimates individual effort and increases the groups’ capacity to achieve its goals. However, in late 1920s, German psychologist names Max Ringelmann did a rope-pulling experiment on groups. He assumed that the group of three would pull three times as much as one person, and group of eight would pull eight times as much as one person. He came to a conclusion that more people in the group may be better for the total productivity, but the individual’s productivity of each group member declines.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics