top-rated free essay

Conformity and Obedience

Oct 08, 1999 963 Words
Conformity and Obedience

The desire to be accepted and belong to a group is an undeniable human need. But how does this need affect an individual? Social psychologists have conducted numerous experiments and concluded that, through various forms of social influence, groups can change their members' thoughts, feelings, and behavior. In her essay "Group Minds," Doris Lessing discusses our paradoxical ability to call ourselves individuals and our inability to realize that groups define and influence us. We, as humans, hold individualism in the highest regard yet fail to realize that groups diminish our individuality. Lessing writes, "when we're in a group, we tend to think as that group does... but we also find our thinking changing because we belong to a group" (p. 334). Groups have the tendency to generate norms, or standards for behavior in certain situations. Not following these norms can make you stand out and, therefore, groups have the ability to influence our thoughts and actions in ways that are consistent with the groups'. Lessing's essay helps set the context to understand the experiments that social psychologists Solomon Asch, Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo conducted to explain conformity and obedience. Solomon Asch's experiment in "Opinions and Social Pressure" studied a subject's ability to yield to social pressure when placed within a group of strangers. His research helped illustrate how groups encourage conformity. During a typical experiment, members of the group were asked by the experimenter to claim two obvious mismatched lines were identical. The single individual who was not privy to this information was the focal point of the experiment. Twelve out of eighteen times the unsuspecting individual went along with the majority, dispelling his beliefs in favor of the opinions of the group. Why did a subject conform in two-thirds of the tests? Influence causes us to think and act in ways that are consistent with our group, especially when we look to the group as a source of information. We also tend to assume that a large number of people can't all be wrong. Asch writes, "the sheer weight of numbers or authority sufficed to change opinions, even when no arguments for the opinions themselves were provided" (p. 337). Stanley Milgram is well known for his work with obedience to authority. His work, "The Perils of Obedience," studied whether average individuals would obey an authority figure, telling them to do something that harms another individual. In his study, the "teacher" is instructed to read a list of words and ask the "learner" to recite them back. If the learner answers incorrectly, the teacher is supposed to shock the learner, starting at 15 volts and increasing to 450 volts. With each incorrect answer the teacher is supposed to increase the shock. Although the teacher thought that he/she was administering shocks, the learner was actually never harmed. Milgram's study undermined the theory that only the most sadistic individuals would submit to such cruelty. His findings showed that, "two-thirds of this studies participants fall into the category of ‘obedient' subjects, and that they represent ordinary people" (p. 352). Milgram concluded that when a person is obeying orders he "views himself as the instrument... and no longer regards himself as responsible for his action" (p. 354). Milgram's experiment proved that when doing a job as instructed by an authority figure the feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated. Responsibility shifts in the minds of the subordinate from himself/herself to the authority figure. There is a purpose for the actions or goals of the authority, and the subordinate is depended upon to meet those goals. Another important study in the area of social roles and obedience is Philip Zimbardo's "Stanford Prison Experiment." A group of 21 college men were divided into two groups for a study on group dynamics. Eleven men became "guards" and the other ten "prisoners." The prisoners were given numbers instead of being allowed to use their names, systematically stripped, de-loused and given prison clothing to wear. The study was terminated prematurely due to the unexpected and disturbing results. The guards quickly became locked into the role of belittling and dehumanizing the prisoners. Although the subjects were fully aware of the nature of the experiment, given the authority, the guards transgressed the boundaries of norms that are considered acceptable. Zimbardo's experiment demonstrated the power of social situations to distort personal identity. What social value did this test serve? Zimbardo proved that social roles might affect behavior more than personality in certain situation. Zimbardo writes, "abnormal social and personal reactions are best seen as a product of... an environment that supported the behavior" (p.374). Like Milgram, Zimbardo determined that almost all humans would do what they are told if they believe the voice of authority is "good." Through their experiments, Asch, Milgram and Zimbardo have proved that social influences can have a profound effect on individuality. One's desire to be accepted can make them unaware of conformity or obedience to authority. The problem lies not only within the group, but also the individual's acceptance of authority without question.
Works Cited
Asch, Solomon. "Opinions and Social Pressure." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.336-342). New York: Longman Press.
Lessing, Doris. "Group Minds." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.333-335). New York: Longman Press.
Milgram, Stanley. "The Perils of Obedience." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.343-355). New York: Longman Press.
Zimbardo, Philip. "The Stanford Prison Experiment." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.363-375). New York: Longman Press.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Conformity and Obedience

    ...Conformity and Obedience Why do we conform? Two basic sources of influence: normative social influence, the need to be liked, accepted by others and Informational influence: need to be correct and to behave in accordance with reality. Solomon Asch (1956) devised an experiment to see if subjects would conform even if they were uncertain tha...

    Read More
  • Conformity and Obedience

    ...Conformity and Obedience Task: outline and evaluate findings from conformity and obedience research and consider explanations for conformity (and non-conformity), as well as evaluating Milgram’s studies of obedience (including ethical issues). The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differenc...

    Read More
  • Conformity and Obedience

    ...CioConformity obedience and authority Conformity basically means compliance with common practices Compliance means doing what other people in our social standing do in our daily lives. Most people, in most social groups, conform in everyday things like speech, dress codes, eating habits etc. This kind of conformity is known as ‘’Social co...

    Read More
  • Conformity and Obedience

    ...CONFORMITY AND OBEDIENCE Barbara Fellows Grand Canyon University January 9, 2013 Conformity and Obedience Comprehending the essence of obedience and disobedience has been an interest for many researchers, psychologists and scientists. Multiple observations have been administered to assist in understanding such issues and the impact e...

    Read More
  • obedience

    ...Obedience is a form of social influence that occurs when a person yields to explicit instructions on orders from an authority figure. Obedience is compliance with commands given by an authority figure. In the 1960s, the social psychologist Stanley Milgram did a famous research study called the obedience study. It showed that people ...

    Read More
  • Influences of Conformity and Obedience

    ...INFLUENCES OF CONFORMITY AND OBEDIENCE Influences of Conformity and Obedience Adrienne Alexander PSYCH 555 Dr. Jay Greiner Applications of Social Psychology •         Make connections between social psychology and other disciplines. Social psychology is ...

    Read More
  • Conformity and Obedience

    ...Conformity and Obedience Assignment In this assignment I intend to evaluate Stanley Milgrams studies of obedience and in particular the ethical issues broken. I hope to determine whether the knowledge gained justifies his experiments. After the destruction and atrocities committed in World War II many historians argued that there must be so...

    Read More
  • Obedience, Conformity and Compliance

    ...Contrasting among Obedience, Conformity and Compliance Obedience, Conformity and Compliance- all are human behaviors. Let’s look at the following incidents- 1. The student followed his teacher’s orders. 2. The parents bought a crib for their new born baby. 3. The factory implemented all the safety measures (for its workers) se...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.