River Plan Too Fishy For My Taste Judas Analysis

In the article, “River Plan Too Fishy for My Taste Buds,” written by Bill McEwen, he express his expectations and concerns toward the river restoration plan on the San Joaquin River. You might wonder how long ago was this? McEwen wrote these concerns in 2009! It has been approximately six years since these articles were published. Now we are able to analyze the results of the river restoration program and how it affected the people and animals involved with it. We can evaluate if the river conditions were unsuitable for the salmon to thrive as previously believed. The river restoration program can also be studied to see if it is boondoggle. In addition, are the farmers greedy when it comes to the San Joaquin River? After the river restoration, the San Joaquin River is fit for the lives of salmon. Bill McEwen stated in his article that the salmon would be unfit to live in the San Joaquin due to the oceanic conditions and the environmental mess that’s the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta. McEwen believed that the salmon were going to be unadapted to the river which would cause their population to once again decline. “ U.S. Bureau of Reclamation fish biologist Don Portz told the newspaper. "We know a lot more about where the fish
The progress that supports this include salmon successfully living in the San Joaquin river counters McEwen’s belief that salmons will be unable to survive in the revitalized river. The idea that the plan is a boondoggle has also been rejected since it clearly benefited many people. Furthermore, recent results of the restoration program display how the farmers were not greedy because they gave up their water and farmland for the recovery of the San Joaquin river. These few points depict the inaccuracy of McEwen’s expectations of the project and show how the San Joaquin is developing so