Preview

Rights of Blacks as Shown in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird and John Grisham's A Time to Kill

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
678 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rights of Blacks as Shown in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird and John Grisham's A Time to Kill
Powerful characters have the ability to persuade and change their peers and their use of values and attitudes
Introduction
* Powerful characters have the ability to persuade and change their peers and their use of values and attitudes. Harper Lee’s novel ‘To kill a Mockingbird’ is a classic text which foregrounds the prejudice, in the form of social commentary. The novel engages the readers’ view using an episodic structure. The story is narrated through the eyes of a grown up Scout, representing Harper Lee herself. Another similar story ‘A time to kill’ by John Grisham defence of a Negro by white lawyer. In this story, the Negro, Carl Lee Hailey is accused of the alleged shooting of two-white men who raped his ten year old daughter. These two novels illustrate how the rights of Negroes are ignored.
Body
1. Atticus Finch is a lawyer in Maycomb which is a small, narrow-minded town with an unusual disease (95). A prejudice disease. He displays tolerance, understanding of another person’s point of view and being able to stand in another person shoes. He stands up for what is right and takes the case even though he’ll lose and believes in individual conscience, the essence of a person’s conscience (114). A symbol of reason and justice. * He uses powerful words to move the jury to be unprejudiced and fair by speaking of equality and how the stupid man is the equal of an Einstein and an ignorant man is the equal of any college president. Powerful conclusion to speech I am confident that you gentlemen will review without passion the evidence you have heard… do your duty (224) although he failed in Tom’s case because he lived in the real world. A world of prejudice. 2. Wanda Womack, one of the jurors deciding the results of the case, convinces the other jurors with her powerful languages. She appeals to the other jurors with the sense of honesty and ask them to be honest with yourself (504). Throughout her influential speech, she uses persuasive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is inevitable that the jurors own personal experiences affect their opinion on the innocence of the defendant. It is these personal experiences, which threaten the defendants right to ‘a fair trial’ at the danger of a juror’s personal bias ‘obscur[ing] the truth.’ Juror 3 is depicted as the juror with the most prejudice throughout the play, consistent with the vote of ‘guilty’ as he relates the defendant to his own son who he describes as a ‘rotten kid.’ This illustrates the danger that personal bias has on the justice system, as the defendant is being adjudicated by juror 3 on his age and gender rather than the merits of the case. Prejudice is also displayed by juror 10 who see’s the accused as ‘trash’ due to his ‘slums’ background, this…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial draws on a rather bleak image of humanity the crime in question is first degree murder most serious charge tried in our courtroom’ the victim is not portrayed as innocent but as a ‘tough, cruel, primitive kind of man’ the lawyers on the case too are described as not doing their job properly and lacking the motivation to investigate the possibilities…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s a scary but a true reality that prejudice has the power to overshadow the facts and evidence, which can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. From the start of the play, juror 4 votes the defendant guilty of murder, not based on facts but entirely based on prejudice and stereotyping the defendant. The fact that the defendant “was born in a slum” (p.g 12) and the generalisation from the outside world: “Children from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.” (p.g 12) convince juror 4 that the defendant must be guilty. Because of prejudice, he cannot see the details like the defendant’s birthplace and circumstances may potentially be used to prove that he does not have a strong motive. As pointed out by the 8th Juror, the defendant was raised in a slum and had “been hit so many times” (p.g 11) that a few slaps from his father cannot make the defendant commit patricide. Therefore, the defendant does not have a strong motive. When we compare juror 8 and juror4’s reasoning, we can see that prejudice and stereotyping can veil the truth of the case and hide it from jurors and consequently prevent them from seeing the truth. However, juror 4 is only prejudiced at the start of…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atticus Finch is a lawyer known to be the most honorable man throughout the small town of Maycomb and is a paragon towards his children in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mocking Bird. His name becomes shamed once he takes the challenge to defend a falsely accused black man guilty for rape against a white woman in the harsh and racial times of the 1930’s south. A con in this situation of defending a black against a white is the sacrifice of being looked upon as disgraceful, and even threatened to be killed along with his children. Atticus a strong believer in justice, courageously steps forward to defend this black man, even though he can already foresee the negative outcome. This case is considered to be a despicable act, but still Atticus fights for his defendant with all his efforts. Atticus knowing the consequences of the situation follows his beliefs over the peer pressure and degrading whispers of his fellow town people.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tkam Essay

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    America has always taken pride in its detailed history, for better or for worse. Many novels have attempted to demonstrate historical events, but none have quite come close to the outstanding perspective of To Kill a Mockingbird. Readers get to see America as it was in the 1930's through the eyes of an untainted, unhindered child. As it has always been told, sadly, racism and prejudice were somewhat of a building block for the founding of this country. The audience experiences this firsthand in the novel as Atticus Finch, a middle-aged lawyer, takes on a case in which he must defend a black man accused of raping a white woman. Circumstantially, the cause for this case would be lost; the black man would be found guilty upon being seen by the jury. As even Reverend Sykes stated, “[he] had never seen any jury decide in favor of a colored man over a white man” (279). But Atticus, an entrepreneur of his own kind, defied the accepted truth and caused the jury to ponder for hours. This was an important moment for both literature and for the well-being of America. It puts into perspective the hardships of African Americans during the 1930’s, which is not something to be taken lightly.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the words of Anthony J. D’Angelo, “If you believe that discrimination exists, it will.” The novel To Kill a Mockingbird, written by Harper Lee, is set in the early thirties in the deep south of Alabama. Various characters are subjected to the old-fashioned ways of discrimination and inequity often found in such a setting. The main protagonist Scout attempts to grasp the concept and learns to live with prejudice in her life. Meanwhile, other characters struggle on a daily basis to find acceptance and, more prominently, justice. This novel contains various situations in which several personalities are persecuted as a result of their race, age and socio-economic standing. Undoubtedly, the unjust and dehumanizing effect of prejudice is one theme in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial prejudice is an ongoing issue in many societies, and has been a very persuasive element since. In To Kill a Mockingbird, Lee uses the constant repetition of the derogatory phrase ‘nigger lover’ as a way of demonstrating the hatred shown towards anyone who supported the African Americans. With this, we are able to understand exactly how prejudice and corrupted racist thoughts could be. However, there are many more racially prejudice ideas presented in the ‘Tom Robinson Case’ of the novel. Tom Robinson is an African American who was convicted by Mr Ewell for raping his daughter. Lee makes it quite obvious in the novel that Tom Robinson was actually innocent and it was Mr Ewell who raped his daughter. Yet, one of the most respected Negros (Tom Robinson) is denied innocence over the most despised white man of Maycomb County (Mr Ewell). This major comparison is the most apparent technique Lee uses to totally show how racially prejudice people could be. To further that, Tom Robinson is murdered despite his innocence. As a result, a sorrowful feeling is created in the reader, making us question “Is this really how racism is?”.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harper Lee’s 1960 novel ‘To kill a mockingbird’ deeply penetrates the concept of walking in somebody else’s shoes. This southern societal drama explores the main message Lee is portraying throughout the novel; that of which being to empathise with somebody in a differing circumstance as yourself. This text revolves around a 1930’s southern American society which openly embraces prejudice towards the minority of powerless in the community, in this case being racism. Lee shares her intended message through themes embedded throughout the text being; power through social dynamics, a human’s instinct to externalise guilt, physiological opposed to physical courage and how ones upbringing influences their moral decisions. These underlying matters are communicated through sophisticated writing techniques which help to develop the novels major themes. These are irony, symbolism, first person dialogue and tone. Combined, a compelling novel is made with powerful meaning entwined into the chapters. ‘To kill a mockingbird’ encourages readers to gain various perspectives of the defining characters and their motives in order to understand Harper Lee’s inspiring beliefs.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of conflicting perspectives is consistently present in Harper Lees’ novel To Kill a Mockingbird. The text asks questions about current trends in society and the attitudes that cause people to ‘act like sheep” and conform while also expressing the need for individuality. It also brings into question the way the judicial system should be beyond reproach no matter what man is on trial, whether they be white or black. In a similar manner it also shows changing attitudes in regards to racism over time and in turn establish a conflicting perspective between the reader and characters of the novel.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The historical and social context in which Lee’s Novel was written must be considered to understand fully the challenges that faced each of the characters in achieving justice. Through developing a back-story and ongoing characterisation the audience understands that the town of Maycomb in which this story is set has the same, southern sentiments of racism consistent with 1930’s Alabama. Historically the story is also set during the great depression with people having ‘nothing to buy and no money to buy it with’, we also learn about the small town traditions and that keeping to oneself was ‘a predilection unforgiveable in Maycomb’. This all adds to the restrictive views of society in which the protagonists of To Kill a Mockingbird must challenge to achieve justice.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Authors compose novels in order to highlight and confront the significant issues of their own context. Racial prejudice and the necessity of achieving justice are two key issues highlighted in To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee and also Montana 1948 by Larry Watson. Lee writes in the 1960s about the 1930s, and Watson writes in the 1990s about the 1940s demonstrating a time when people were persecuted for their race, gender, religion and education. These novels are crafted to provide insight of the issues experienced in society and to enlighten society’s current perceptions. Both authors desire to educate responders about the destructive nature of prejudice that disenfranchised individuals experienced and that the corrupt actions of empowered individuals can lead to the detriment of failing to achieve justice. Through narrative voice, contextual features and character development, Lee and Watson achieve this purpose of challenging responders to confront the fundamental issues that society has disregarded.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men - 1

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Prejudice is seen as one crucial issue in constituting a verdict for the jury, as two of the jurors are biased against the suspect of the murder. Language and characterisation of the jurors is crucial techniques in which Reginald uses to convey the bitterness of one of the jurors, Juror #10. In the play, he states “Look, you know how these people lie! It's born in them!” halfway through the play, displaying his racial prejudice towards the suspect of murder; generalising slum people as those who “…you cannot trust”. The use of characterisation and speech, allows the audience to recognise the prejudice in the jury some that is justifiable. Tension is also another dramatic technique used to convey the Juror #3 bias against the boy because of his own relationship with his son who “…didn’t know how to fight”. This technique shows the conflicts between him and Juror #8; every time Juror #8 brings up an argument, Juror #3 always rebuts with biased statements, bringing the tension up. However, this tension is always brought down by some a change in stage direction. Shown in ACT II, Juror #2 “moves to the window” after arguing with Juror #8; allowing the play’s audience to perceive Juror #8 as someone who is not biased against the murder suspect, displaying him as someone who was doing the right thing.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Atticus represents the moral conscience of Maycomb, though the society itself is ignoring it. He continually upholds the value of what is good and right in the novel, therefore conveying Harper Lee’s own moral stance in the narrative.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atticus Finch is one of the most prominent and respected people in the town who has strong views on courage. His role in the story serves as a moral backbone and fatherly figure to his children.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similar to Abraham Lincoln, Atticus Finch is a lawyer who is persistent in his beliefs even though others might be against him. The people in Maycomb respect Atticus Finch because of his integrity, courage, tolerance, consistent strength, self-possession, and his sense of justice. In Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird, Atticus Finch is a role model.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays