Preview

Right To Refuse Medical Treatment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right To Refuse Medical Treatment
Patients Right to Refuse Medical Treatment Individuals seek medical treatment everyday to stay healthy, treat an illness, or just to stay alive. We all seek treatment whether it is voluntary or in an emergency basis. Some individuals suffer from severe illnesses in which others could not bear to live with. Some illnesses are so debilitating that patients wish they could just die. Once a patient gets to a certain point they may decide to refuse medical treatment because they do not want to be saved anymore. They are tired of suffering and wish to end their lives. Doctors face at least one ethical issue on a day to day basis and that is to determine if a patient be able to refuse medical treatment.
Teenager refusing medical treatment
…show more content…
After six months the child relapses and the physician decides the patient's only chance at life is to have a bone marrow transplant. He explains the complications of the procedure but states if the patient does not have this the patient will only live a year. The parents and the child discuss the options and decide to have the transplant but the patient wants to ask questions concerning what happens if the procedure fails. The patient is told not to think negative thoughts. The parent signs the consent form and the preparation starts. The patient is in more pain now and also becomes scared because they overhear information about other children in the hospital. The patient hears that other children gone to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and never came back. One week after the transplant the patient starts to get sick and cannot breathe. A ventilator is necessary in order to save the patient but that can only be done in the PICU. The patient pleads for them not to send him to the PICU but they do not listen. The patient is sent to the PICU and was put into a comma. The patient could hear what was going on around him but he could not move at all. The patient finally dies in the PICU. (Derish,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hsm 542 week 2 you decide

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The morals involved here is the patient’s right to refuse care if she chooses and also the right to die. The moral principles of ethics involved also in this case are: Beneficence- act of doing good, demonstrating kindness, showing compassion, and helping others; Non-maleficence- avoiding the infliction of harm; Justice- the duty to be fair in the distribution of risks and benefits, and; Autonomy- recognizing an individual’s right to make his or her own decisions.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An analysis of Robert Schwartz “Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine” reveals that physicians are not required to give patients treatment that has been proven to be effective, and they are not morally obligated to provide treatment that is not in-line with practice of medicine. Schwartz explains although our autonomy is respected, there are limitations on our request.…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As adults and human beings we have certain inalienable rights to make decisions regardless of whether they are deemed as poor or inappropriate by others. One must take into consideration the level of understanding and competence a patient possesses to assure they are informed of all options and repercussions; the other must be whether the individual is harming anyone other than themselves by making said decision. Once those issues have been taken into consideration there must be an allowance for an individual to make their own well-informed choice, even though as a practitioner, we may feel it is not in their best interest.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health care practitioners are faced with ethical dilemmas at growing rate. For example, a nurse may violate a homeless patient’s right to receive full information regarding his or her disease prognosis. The nurse assumes since the patient is uninsured, the patient will not be able to afford medicine to cure the problem, therefore, the information of the prognosis is discarded and the patient is quickly being discharged shortly after.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physicians and patients debate over whether or not physician assisted suicide is okay to do in any circumstances, because there are pros and cons to every side. One might say that if a physician assists in the suicide it may help someone not suffer through a slow painful death. Another person might argue that if a physician does assist even by just prescribing the medicine is morally wrong and against the oath the physician takes at the beginning of his or her career. Understanding some people are terminally ill and want to just die versus putting up the fight is a hard situation to understand, but some physicians do “understand”. Even though they understand does not mean that they will agree to assist in taking the pain away from someone. On the other hand a patient may want to live as long as possible and prosper every bit of their life even if it means being in a vegetative state.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianists, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, said, “The right action is the one that, on balance, promotes the most happiness, or the greatest amount of pleasure over pain” (Steinbock p.9), and “Man desires as much happiness and as little suffering as possible, and nothing else is worth desiring” (Fenigsen p.244). I can’t say that I always agree with utilitarianism, but in this case of PAS I convinced that doctors have to satisfy the small amount of terminally ill patients what is very popular in this ethical theory. This way of thinking might be criticized by Kantianism which advocates promoting the happiness not only for few people. Some cases from countries and a few states in USA, where PAS is legal, show that it might happen that satisfying some people doctors could abuse others, but it’s not too much occasions, because the number of people who ask for help is still so small, and the affairs of abuse are rare. For example, the statistic in 2010 in Oregon shows that 96 Oregonians asked their doctors to prescribe a deadly barbiturate which they could ingest causing their own death; 65 of them went ahead and did so. This mode of dying accounts for just 0.2% of death in Oregon (Brennan p. 18). Also the request of PAS was from really terminally ill patients. In the Netherlands and Belgium the large majority of the patient suffered from…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a choice of physician-assisted suicide if the patient is breathing and of sound mind. Moreover, a patient having a less than ten percent chance of living, physician-assisted suicide should be an option. Physicians are healers of disease and injury, preservers of life, and relievers of suffering. Determining the ethical responsibilities of physicians when patients wish to die requires a close examination of the doctor’s role in society (JAMA, 1992-vol 267, No. 16).…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most individuals, especially those fond of medical dramas, know of the Hippocratic Oath and its primary obligation of doing no harm; however, the vow physicians take before graduating medical school is being challenged by physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS. Individuals diagnosed with a terminal illness that causes pain and suffering towards the end of life will pick a date to painlessly die before their disease progresses too far. As this practice becomes more widespread, arguments over the ethics of medical doctors aiding in the suicide of their ill patients have erupted. Some argue that in doing so, doctors violate the Hippocratic Oath while stripping the patient of their personal autonomy. Those who support the decision to commit…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nowadays, ethical dilemmas are an integral part of the health care system. It takes place when there are different opinions on moral claims. We get to a conflict when there is good evidence to indicate that a certain act is morally wrong or right but neither the evidence is definite (Beauchamp and Childress 1994). Health care settings have ethical dilemmas arise at any time due to different opinions. The article, “Ethical dilemma due to man’s kidney transplant”, which was published in Shanghai daily on March 17, 2011(China.org.cn) is an example of an ethical dilemma situation.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being forced in and out of the hospital with unimaginable, unbearable pain, sickness, and suffering. They are offered as much medicine as the doctors can prescribe to help take the edge off but are still miserable. At what point do they say "I have had enough." Once that decision has been made, envision being told that there is nothing any doctor can do and that person just has to wait until their body just gives in and can't take anymore. How ethical is it to leave someone in so much agony? Why not give them that one last decision to make on their…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the literature, there have been many arguments both in favour and against physician assisted suicide. One of the most common argument is that doctors are supposed to save lives and not take them. Hippocratic Oath states that physician’s duty is to use treatment to save the patient and not do any harm (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009, p. 149). They also argue that assisting in the patient’s death is not only against the ethical traditions but it may also prevent patients from seeking help due to fear(Ersek, 2004). While, people in favour of assisted suicide emphasize the importance of principle of autonomy. They argue that It should be the patient’s right to decide if he wants to live or die. By preventing patients from ending their life, healthcare providers are imposing their own views onto their patients(de Vocht & Nyatanga, 2007)…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    right to ask your doctor to end your suffering? Or is that treading too far?…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do think people have the right to refuse treatment if and only if that person has the "capacity to deliberate a plan of action" and has the "capacity to put the plan into action" (Shannon & Kockler 47). Denying a competent person the ability to decide for his or herself would being denying their autonomy. I think the idea of providing appropriate treatment to a person in need describes our understanding of beneficence because we as humans want to help other humans. We feel an obligation to help others, and that shows by our want to provide treatment.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays