Rhetorical analysis of Strip Club Owners

Topics: Nudity, Supreme Court of the United States, Striptease Pages: 6 (2122 words) Published: March 2, 2014
Michael Reich
Clint Buffington
WRD 111
Rhetorical analysis of Strip Club Owners

This country was founded on the ideals of freedom and those freedoms were somewhat clearly defined the day the US Constitution was drafted. That being said, people and judges in every state of the union have a different interpretation of what these freedoms are. This is the case for the strip club owners in the state of Kentucky, although they are not the only state to be under fire from the city governments. The main issue at hand is that city officials are being pressured to restrict strip clubs from the practices that have formed their business and this is ultimately impacting the customer base seeking this entertainment avenue. Strict laws force people to push the envelope to ensure they meet their basic needs. I will try to define the exact issue that club owners are facing today and how they are doing whatever it takes to ensure their business doors stay open. Past history shows, that just because some good or service is taken away from a demanding customer; the result is not always the intended one. The struggle between strip club owners and city officials is not exactly a new development. Year after year, in cities all across the nation, club owners are facing city council members working to issue new zoning regulations. A major US Supreme Court case, which happened in 1991 and was Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., laid the foundation for future cases because of its decision. Ultimately it ruled that the state had the right to regulate the use of expressive conduct, and in Justice Souter’s words, “nudity itself is not inherently expressive conduct.” (Barnes) Souter was merely saying that it wasn’t an issue of being nude, but one of being nude and dancing erotically. This paved the way for more cities to go after club owners and force them to ensure their performers were wearing a proper amount of clothing. Scott Lindsay, co-owner of the Godfather strip club in Louisville said, “It takes away revenue streams for single mothers, girls working their way through school, college. It takes revenue away from us." He says 50% of sales are from convention business.” (Chinn) This is not good news for the club owners, who make their income by providing customers with the entertainment of nude women dancing, not women in bikinis. They do not understand why government is diligently working to crackdown on their clubs, although many people offer some possible reasons. Club owners try to say that there is nothing wrong with their business or what goes on behind closed doors involving consenting adults. If people have a problem with strip clubs, then do not go into them. The issue at hand is that if government forces strip clubs to follow new regulations, clubs will most likely lose a large portion of their business. Not only does this affect them, but also all services directly connected to them. For instance, performers will have fewer opportunities to collect funds, bartenders will be serving fewer drinks, and the taxi driver will have a seat minus a few rear ends. Club owners see it as a domino effect, negatively impact the community at a time when the economy is in turmoil and people need money to support their families in crisis. Government has an entirely different agenda, one that is to protect residents who have struggled to build their communities. These clubs, supposedly bring a laundry list full of wanted issues. At the top of the list of undesirables, are those predisposed to criminal activity and vagrancy. This is said to cause lowered value in surrounding neighborhoods, pushing down the property value of homes in the area and also causing families extra grief. So to combat these unwanted issues government decided to enforce limits on what can take place within club owner’s establishments. Some of which include, a 6-foot minimum buffer zone between patrons and performers, prohibition of the sale of...

Cited: Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560. Supreme Court of the United States. 1991. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 29 Feb. 2012.
Chinn, Valerie. "Lap dancer, nudity to end at Louisville strip clubs." WDRM. N.p., 2010. Web. 1 Mar 2012.
Hilyard, Scott. "Big Al 's owner says strip club tax could wipe out businesses." Journal Star [Peoria, Illinois] 17 Feb 2012, n. pag. Web. 1 Mar. 2012.
Keller, Rudi. "Supreme Court upholds limits on strip clubs." Columbia Daily Tribune 15 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 1 Mar. 2012.
Lindell, Chuck. "Texas Supreme Court tackles tax on strip clubs." Statesman [Austin, Texas] 25 Mar 2010, n. pag. Web. 1 Mar. 2012.
Meador, Jonathan. "Strip: Tease Are Louisville’s adult entertainment regulations bad for business?." LEO Weekly [Louisville] 20 Jul 2011, n. pag. Web. 1 Mar. 2012.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Rhetorical Analysis
  • Essay on Rhetorical Analysis: Rhetorical Analysis:
  • Rhetorical analysis Essay
  • Rhetorical analysis Essay
  • rhetorical analysis Research Paper
  • Rhetorical Analysis Essay
  • rhetorical analysis Essay
  • rhetorical analysis Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free