Preview

Rene Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
910 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
Meditations on First Philosophy is a very influential book, written by Rene Descartes. Many philosophers look to this book for inspiration and for answers to many of life’s questions. One of these philosophers would be David Hume. Hume often did not share the same thoughts and beliefs as Descartes but uses his ideas on the origin of thought to further explain his own. The Meditations are written in order to answer one simple question, “what can we know for certain?” While this might seem like a very simple question to answer, Descartes takes a different approach by doubting everything he could possibly know in order to see what remains as the truth. Descartes thought that in order to discover things that are true and would remain for years to come, he would have to rule out everything that could be proved wrong. He believed that true knowledge can only be rational, in other words, you cannot have true knowledge from your senses (Meditations, pg. 2). David Hume did not share these same beliefs and felt that Descartes philosophy was much too metaphysical. David Hume …show more content…
He begins by introducing a piece of wax from a honeycomb which he explains is golden in colour, is hard and smells like honey. Everyone would recognize this as a piece of wax, but put it by a fire and it begins to change into something unrecognizable from its original state. It has now become soft and no longer smells the same, yet we are still able to recognize it as the same piece of wax. Descartes suggests that there is some sort of property or connection beyond the senses that lets us be aware that this is the same piece of wax. Descartes says that intellect is what makes those connections, not physical observations. Since the senses often mislead us, intellectual properties beyond the object are what can give us rational knowledge (Meditations, pg.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Thus, they can be called into doubt. He is aware that if something deceives you at least one time, it will again, and therefore it cannot be trusted. This is evident when he states, “I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive; and it is a mark of prudence never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us even once” (14). This statement proves that Descartes believes that his senses’ reliability can be called into question. For example, he states that our senses are not always accurate when it comes to perceiving small and distant objects, because we may mistake a fly on the wall for a smudge if we do not look at it from a close enough distance. By doing this, Descartes discredits the first claim he makes, which says that you must believe what your senses tell you. Therefore, he has discovered that he cannot rely on his senses for his intended philosophical foundation upon which he wishes to build his…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Therefore, there exists an active faculty of producing sense ideas, either in me, or in something else.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later in his second meditation, as Descartes begins to doubt his own conclusion that he exists as a thinking thing, he goes into an elaborate analogy known as his "wax passage". Comparing the wax to his knowledge of himself, he begins by discussing the physical characteristics which can be known by means of the senses. However, the importance lies in the fact that by heating, the wax can be altered and the sensible properties are no longer the same. He then goes on to explain that even though this occurs, he is still able to mentally grasp the existence of the wax even with new properties. In realizing this, Descartes struggles with how it is he can grasp the wax without relying its sensible characteristics. He decides then that he is actually experiencing a manifestation of an idea that only his mind can perceive, instead of what he senses. He realizes the importance of the fact that something can be perceived…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes talked about the essence of material things and prove that God exists again. Descartes said that it is obvious that whatever is true is something, and he have already demonstrated at some length that all that he know clearly is…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes said he doubted everything in search for certain, or absolute, truth. The first thing he found that he could…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    BETWEEN APPEARANCE AND REALITY Bertrand Russell once asked, “Is there any knowledge in the world which is so certain that no reasonable man could doubt it?” (Cahn, 2012) In his own method, he believed this to be false; after all, everyone perceives the world differently than the person next to them. By using a table as an example, he explains that everything should be questioned, even the things that appear to be absolute. In this paper, Russell’s theory is compared to those of René Descartes and David Hume. Descartes convinces himself that everything in life is a falsehood; from the world around him to his very limbs. To combat this, he views everything as deception. He admits to being “lazy” occasionally, slipping into the habit of believing instead of doubting the things around him.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Meditation one, Descartes initially writes about a blanket of ignorance that he feels he’s been trapped under for his entire life up until this point. He says “I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true.” With this statement, Descartes decides to do a spring cleaning of sorts of all his beliefs that he has reason to doubt. He makes a point to mention though, that not all of his beliefs are false or able to be refuted.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes argues throughout the meditations, that we should be sceptical of our perception of the external world, due to his belief that all of our perceptions of physical things are perceived by the senses. This is the case, Descartes argues, as our senses of the physical things in the external world can be deceived. Properties which physical things possess, can be lost, or changed. Descartes demonstrates this with a piece of hard wax, which aroused his senses in a variety of ways, including: smell, taste, touch and sound. Descartes then melts the wax, to witness the extinction of the properties he can sense.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why for Hume a true philosophy is true skepticism? Often, Hume is categorized as an atheist, but such categorization needs to be questioned, for Hume does not necessarily deny the existence of God, but rather he inquires about the true nature of God in Dialogues by presenting three characters with different philosophical positions. Hume's attempt to substantiate the rationality of religious belief, I argue, renders Hume's skeptical stance as an affirmation of the possibility for the existence of God. Hume argues in his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding that knowledge is established from experience (Hume, 545a).…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation Iii

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the "Mediations of First Philosophy" Descartes tries to prove the existence of God in the third meditation. He does this by coming up with several premises that eventually add up to a solid argument. First, I will explain why Descartes ask the question, does god exist? And why does Descartes think he needs such and argument at this point in the text. Secondly, I will explain, in detail, the arguments that Descartes makes and how he comes to the conclusion that God does exist. Next, I will debate some of Descartes premises that make his argument an unsound one, including circular reasoning. Finally, I will see if his unsound argument has diminished and undermined his principal goals and the incorrigible foundation of knowledge.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first premise is Descartes brings into this argument is that he can only know something about the external world, arithmetic, and geometry only if he can know that there is not an evil spirit deceiving him (Meditations, pg. 15-16). In other words, Descartes is trying to get at the fact that this so to say God is giving him false perception of the external world, and deceiving him in what he thought he knew was certain. Descartes conception of knowledge is broken into different parts one being truths that can only be known by reason alone, also those that are not known by reason alone, and the other is the empirical part in the natural sciences (Ludwig, 2017).…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes’ method of doubt is a method of being skeptical about the truth of beliefs. It aims to find things that cannot be doubted…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main foundation of his education was from the senses or through the senses. (D 60) Descartes proves that the senses can not be trusted, therefore they can not be the foundation of his knowledge. The perception of things through our senses can be deceiving. Take his example of the wax for instance. At one point his sensory perception of the wax is its color, scent, sound, texture, and etc. However when the wax is brought close to a flame its color, scent, sound, texture, and all the properties of the wax will change. Nevertheless, it is evident that the “object”, that has been brought next to the flame is still the same wax that was once away from the flame. Our senses would not have been able to identify the hard wax and the melted wax as the same object. The senses would classify the solid wax as one object and the melted wax as another object. “I do not grasp what this wax is through the imagination; rather, I perceive it through the mind alone.” (D 68) By using wax as an example it is clear that the perception of objects is not sensory, but it is an inspection done by the mind. We use our senses to obtain perceptions and those perceptions are inspected by the mind turning them into judgments. Those judgments are where we get our knowledge of self. With the question what am I? The mind already knows and tells you that you are a “thinking thing”.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays