Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Relationship Between Marc Antony and Julis Caesar

Good Essays
761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Relationship Between Marc Antony and Julis Caesar
Relationship Between Marc Antony and Julius Caesar

A moral politician is a term that most think of as an oxymoron, two puzzle pieces that don't quite fit together. Abraham Lincoln stated that, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." To Honest Abe, presenting someone with arbitrary jurisdiction was the ultimate test of ethics. However, it's also been reflected upon that "absolute power corrupts absolutely." Therefore, it can be concluded that any person given power will eventually become venal and labeled as an unjust leader. Yet that statement is put under scrutiny when the persona of Marc Antony is anatomized.

Although most politicians are predominantly loyal to themselves, Antony exhibited faithfulness to Caesar even past death. Nevertheless, he was shrewd enough to use his love for Caesar to manipulate the murderers into believing his desire to "[take their] hands" and "be pricked in number of [their] friends" (III.i.216, 218). Using the guise of a friendly gesture, he internally marked the conspirators for revenge. Because of his innate skill of reading people and melding his actions to their desires, the abettors were blinded by adulation and failed to see the irony in his words. Twisting people's will to suit his own through flattery, expression, and rhetoric is a talent of Antony's.

Using his sly ways, he convinces the audience at Caesar's funeral that rebelling against the murderers is not only what they need to do but what they want to do as well. What's even better is that he manages to make them believe that this decision was made on their own part; however, it was a plot that he subliminally embedded into their brains. After Brutus spoke citizens cried that "Caesar was a tyrant" (III.ii.72) and felt loyalty to the aforementioned. Accordingly, he cleverly juxtaposed "ambitious Caesar" (III.ii.27" with "the noble Brutus" (III.ii.79) to convince the listeners of Julius' true, caring self while simultaneously smiting Brutus' character. Using persuasive rhetoric concerning the means of Caesar's will, he then clenches the hearts of the people and gains a guarantee of having them on his side. Yet, even though the general welfare of the people is his first priority, Antony never separates his private affairs from his public actions.

Antony convinces the people that they would "beg a hair of [Caesar] for memory, and dying, mention it within their wills, bequeathing it as a rich legacy unto their issue" (III.ii.136-139) due to the treasures willed to them by the deceased Caesar. He then pulls a complete 180° turn and conspires with Octavious Caesar about "how to cut off some charge in legacies" (IV.i.9) in order to raise an army against Brutus and Cassius. It becomes pointedly clear in this dialogue that Antony doesn't let ethical concerns prevent him from harvesting resources in a more politically tactical manner. In the two lines a flaw in Marcus' moral dignity is revealed. Concurrently, Shakespeare sews in the underlying theme that solid virtuous principles can't always co-exist with political success.

However, although this blemish is disclosed to us, Antonious' verbal irony is veiled from the public eye. He sagaciously employs Lepidus as a member of the triumvirate to bend to his own aspirations. He cleverly lies "honors on this man to ease [himself] of diver's sland'rous loads" (IV.i.19-20). Intending to have Lepidus "bear them as the ass bears gold," "either led or driven as [he] point[s] the way," (IV.i.21, 23) he knows that in the end all the fault will lie with his frontman while his image remains virtually unscathed. By positioning Lepidus' character beside a pack animal's in an insulting simile, Antonious' view of his ally as a stepping stone is projected and his principles are once again put into question.

In one instance Marcus Antonious is built up as a savior of Rome as an effect of the charisma and sincerity that litter his long monologues and peek through his rhetorical sayings. Yet in the next his character may be pulled under the analytical knife by a sudden change in idiosyncrasies. In this way, Shakespeare effectively camouflages the total extent of Antony's true qualities. By layering these multiple personalities, Shakespeare created a powerful, manipulative character (even more so than Cassius) within The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Therefore, no matter what conclusion is drawn about Marcus Antonious' ethical principles, it must be succeeded that he, although not always an honest one, is a propitious politician.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony each gave their own speeches at Julius Caesar’s funeral to persuade the people of Rome to make them their new leader by using many rhetorical devices. Brutus came off as a traitor of Caesar, claiming that they killed Julius Caesar for the sake of Rome. He tried to overthrow what had occurred by striking fear into the people’s eyes, stating “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” By letting the people of Rome envision what horrible things and events would unfold if Caesar was still alive and ruler. He also uses fallacy to allow the audience to think about what their lives would be like tied down under Caesar’s rule then what it will be like with Caesar gone and…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus’s speech is delivered in prose, a somewhat unpolished and unsophisticated manner of speaking. The use of prose in this instance appeals to the audience as they are able to directly relate to this manner of speaking, being of a somewhat lower class, thus allowing Brutus to connect with them on a higher level. He also arouses patriotism and plays on the rights to civil freedom of the audience to offer further persuasiveness to his speech. He does this by inferring logical and restrained reasoning for Caesar’s death which appeals to the audience’s intelligence and commonsense. The high modality of the rhetorical question “Who is here so vile that will not love his country?” is extremely powerful in agitating the existing devotion the audience has towards Rome. Similarly in the essay Arguments against…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus uses their passion to his advantage, and convinces the conspirators that their own will power would be what compelled them to complete their task, not an oath. Another piece of evidence used to illustrate this, is when Brutus is defending the reasons behind his actions at Caesar’s funeral and he says, “ As / Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, / I rejoice at it…” (JC.III.ii.24-26). By using the two words ‘loved’ and ‘weep’, Brutus is not only making himself seem vulnerable to the townspeople, but he is also showing that the death of Caesar was not necessarily what he wanted, and that the death of who was once his dear friend, upset him deeply. By doing this, people begin to feel sorry for Brutus, and they are not nearly as outraged as they are before he was given the opportunity to explain…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He illuminated their worries and played into to their weak minds. His gift of rhetorics is able to seduce every man in the city into killing the conspirators; and they do kill the conspirators. Antony states that they are all honorable Romans, and the Romans think Antony respects them. In reality he wants the conspirators dead, and uses the Romans to do so. As a leader in our society today Antony would be able to get rid of the untrustworthy leaders and keep order, law, and loyalty in our government. He would also be able to invoke a healthy sense of fear into the hearts on our citizens, fear that is not currently present.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Julius Caesar Bad

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar in the play "The tragedy of Julius Caesar" was a in line to be the next ruler of Ancient Rome. Caesar becomes drunk in power as most people would when there are roughly a million people adoring you. The people of Ancient Rome truly liked Caesar, in fact in Act 1 Scene 1, a commoner says "..we are taking holiday for Caesar's arrival.." In this act the reader gets a sense on how much the people like Caesar. However it is also shown to the reader how much noblemen do not like or trust Caesar to be a good leader. Throughout Act 1 and 2 Cassius is trying to convince Brutus, one of Caesar's good friends, to help them murder Caesar so he could take the crown. Brutus and his followers believe they are doing a service to the people. That in some way sacrificing Caesar is for the better good. However this being said Caesar's death was not a sacrifice it was a butchery, there is no need to go out and kill someone.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus’s genuine heart causes him to make the decisions he does throughout the play. Brutus was not originally for killing Caesar, as Caesar was a dear friend and close ally to him. After some distressed letters from the “people of Rome” arrive at Brutus’ study, he decides that he has “no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general.” (II.i.11-12) He decides that because the people of Rome feared Caesar’s rise to power, he must do something to stop it from occurring. His distinction and genuine intentions cause him to look out for the people's’ best interest. Later on, when Brutus is conversing with the fellow conspirators, Cassius suggests the murder of Mark Antony as well. Brutus rejects this idea, saying “Antony is but a limb of Caesar” and “Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius.”(II.i.178-179) Brutus explains that Antony will be nothing without Caesar to ease Cassius’s perspective, but also killing Antony will turn their noble cause into a murder spree. Brutus, unlike Cassius and the others, sincerely believes that he is helping with Caesar’s murder for the people’s good. Therefore, Brutus was a true and honorable roman up until his death, as Antony states in his…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    •Antony is looked upon as an irresponsible kid who likes to attend plays and go out at night. He was Caesar's loyal assistant. That Antony loved Caesar there is no doubt. There is, however, ample evidence that Antony was the "sleek-headed man" of whom Caesar warns in Act I. His oration at Caesar's funeral was more than an attempt to avenge Caesar's death. It was a power grab. Antony speaks of Caesar's will. During the civil war that follows, he changes the will. Antony ruthlessly orders the murder of hundreds of citizens.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire and Brutus

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus is a patriotic middle aged man, who truly cares about the well being of his fellow people. “I do fear, the people, Choose Caesar for their king,” says Brutus. (Act 1 scene 2, 80) Despite Brutus’ friendship with Caesar, he much rather prefers Rome to remain a republic. He puts the masses before his own friendship. Brutus in return, is seen as trustworthy and reliable by the people. Indeed, Brutus is a noble man. Brutus says, “For let the gods so speed me as I love, the name of honor more than I fear death.” (act 1 scene 2, 90) He values honesty, fairness and balance. He is willing to lay his own life for what he believes. He is passionate and will do as much as what is needed so that what he believes is right will shine through. Brutus is easily swayed by Cassius in Act 1 scene 2. “Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”?” says the sly Cassius. (Act 2 scene 2, 140) After Cassius’ speech, Brutus considers the proposition of plotting against Caesar and does not shun the idea at all. Brutus is so willing to believe in his worthiness and Cassius’ call for action. He fails to truly listen to the Romans because he is too engrossed in doing what he believes is best for them.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar "boldly, but not angerly."(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antony was well known throughout the political world in Rome and among his military colleagues as a virtuous, trailblazing commander. After all, he was in fact the great Julius Caesar’s second in command. Through much of the internal conflict of his time, he did astoundingly maintain at least some support in Rome. However, his failing to acknowledge Octavian’s military and political potential was his first mistake.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Brutus comes out to confront the crowd, he addresses his speech to everyone, " Romans, countrymen, and lovers, hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear."(298) When he starts his speech, and is presenting it to the people of Rome, he sounds believable, and trustworthy. He tells of that, " Not that I lov'd Caesar less, but that I lov'd Rome more."(298) He wants the People of Rome to know that, if this were not to happen to Caesar, "then you all will live like slaves."(298) Caesar was ambitious and that is why he must be killed. Since he is dead you all can be freemen, Free to live your lives without Caesar, but under the control of a new leader.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Brutus remains noble and refuses to take more lives than necessary, stating, “Let’s be sacrificers, not butchers, Caius… we shall be called purgers, and not murderers” (page 51). While others join the conspiracy for their own personal ambitions, much like how Cassius has monetary gains at the sole forefront of his mind when he commits the murder, Brutus is concerned only for his country and kills Caesar for that reason: so that the republic will last longer without a dictatorial threat looming in the distance. When Brutus commits suicide, his final words are: “Caesar, now be still, I killed not thee with half so good a will,” meaning that the would-be dictator’s death is nobler than his and that Caesar’s death is now avenged. At the end of the play, Antony praises Brutus and calls him “the noblest Roman of them all” (page 163); when one is praised by their enemy, it shows that they are well-respected, even by their foes.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays