Preview

Relationship Between John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor in Cruclible

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Relationship Between John Proctor and Elizabeth Proctor in Cruclible
“How does Arthur Miller use stage directions to establish the relationship between John and Elizabeth proctor in act 2 ?”

Arthur miller uses stage directions to establish the relationship betwee John and Elizabeth in act 2. The narrative at the beginning of the scene John is directed to season the stew that Elizabeth has made for their evening meal because he wasn’t quite pleased with what she had made. This can be interpreted as a symbol which says that he is dissatisfied with Elizabeth because she is not good enough wife for him. This suggests that it is possible that he has not been pleased with Elizabeth for a long time. When they advance to eat John compliments Elizabeth on how well it was seasoned, this is ironic due to the fact that we know that John seasoned the stew, though she did not know in the stage direction it says she “blushed with pleasure” this suggests that she delighted that she has satisfied him. After that she says “I took great care” which gives the auidence the imprint that even though John is displesed with what Elizabeth has given him, she had tried her best to please him. This could be because John feels guilty about his affair with Abigail. But it also gives the impression to the audience that there is a lack of communication between them because, John feels he has to hide the fact that he added seasoning, just to make Elizabeth happy. The stew almost represents how the couple’s differences in character are reflected in their differences in taste. Miller is using dramatic irony here to show that with something so trivial there is still dishonesty between them; this is what has led to a breakdown of trust. It could also show that Proctor wants to make things better in his life: especially with Elizabeth. Through this, the audience can see that Proctor really wants to make Elizabeth happy and doesn’t want to put a foot wrong as he is saying as little as possible. Nevertheless there is a sturdy display of dissatisfication In both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Proctor compromised the reputation of his name, and values that he cherishes by having an affair with Abigail Williams. This flaw will forever haunt him. Arthur Miller uses symbolism and irony to support the central idea that Proctor can either die honorably or live a lie.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    11.a. Speaker: The speaker is John Proctor, who is a local farmer and the husband of Elizabeth Proctor.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I can't believe that awful, no good man, John Proctor. He had the audacity to choose that whining wife over me. I am way better than that goody too shoes Elizabeth Proctor. We have vastly different character traits; we are like day night. She is a naive, simple woman. I on the other hand am an adventurer. I am knowledgeable, healthy, and certainly far from simple. Why, any man would be lucky to have me as their wife. Elizabeth is a old hag who should just disappear. I am a beautiful, young, healthy woman. Yet alas, the man I want so desperately is connected to this evil witch of a woman! I mean can she be anymore annoying? She is always nagging me and everyone else in…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Proctor did to hurt his wife by sleeping with Abigail. After he slept with Abigail, John and Elizabeth’s relationship has been timid. They are constantly fighting over the little things,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like her husband, Elizabeth has some descriptive terms about her tone; like John Proctor she was bitter during Act II because she has been fooled because of John Proctor's adultery. Then she becomes more compassionate and forgiving because John is on the brink of death in Act III. In the beginning of Act II, Elizabeth is more suspicious of John continuing her sins as she asks” what keeps you so late? It is almost dark”(1266). She was so quick to assume that John Proctor was doing something other than what he was actually doing, providing food for the family. She is a loyal wife that she would go as far as to lie to the court to keep John alive; she does this as he testifies “My husband is a good and righteous man. He is never drunk as some are … but always at his work”(). Although it is a sin this is also a sense of her Redemption because she has forgiven her past adultering husband. And finally in Act IV, when Elizabeth Proctor and John Proctor meet for the last time, she forgives him and blames the unsettled feeling on the household on herself; she goes on to say “John, I counted myself so plain, so poorly made, no honest love could come to me! It were a cold house I kept”(). As John became hysterical, Elizabeth wanted to forgive him and just blames herself in the same manner because she feel so bad and John’s about to die and that leads to try to rectify the situation and the mental pain. Miller perfects the embodiment of a couple who, under all of the issues they have, love each other more than anything in the…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Proctor, wife of John Proctor, goes through a transformation because of the happenings of the…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the play, Elizabeth has a tense, distant relationship with her husband because he had an affair with Abigail Williams, who is both the Proctors’ antagonist and uses pathos to cause strife between them. Elizabeth still had not been able to forgive John for this, causing their relationship to suffer. However, the accusations brought against them by Abigail force Elizabeth and John to pull together and unite against their accusers. She is able to move past John’s sin when saying, “John, it come to naught that I should forgive you, if you’ll not forgive yourself” (Miller 138). Elizabeth is able to let John know that she does not hold his sin against him anymore, and he should not as well. Elizabeth also changes from being an incredibly truthful person to one that is willing to lie to save her husband. When John is accused, he tells the court that he has committed adultery with Abigail, and this is why Abigail is accusing him. However, the court does not believe him, so John has Elizabeth brought out to prove to the court that her husband did indeed have an affair. Since Elizabeth has never lied before in her life,…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller is an American playwright who started writing “the hook” which is about union corruptions on the Brooklyn waterfront. Then he started writing The Crucible which is about a troubled young girl named Abigail Williams, who had an affair with John Proctor in his 30s, and the witch trials. He also wrote The Crucible during the communism time and during the “Hitler speech, hoping to give them a sense of the Nazi which my play took place.” The article allegory was about how Arthur Miller against McCarthyism, and how John Proctor and Arthur Miller are alike.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘The Crucible’ is a novel which was written by Arthur Miller in 1953. It takes place during the times of the Salem witch trials in Massachusetts. This was a time of much hypocrisy in the people of the town of Salem. Many people believed anything they heard or saw. Although The Crucible is fictitious, the story depicts the historical information of the Salem witch trials, and blends them with fictitious characters to create a very realistic plot and conflict in the story. Miller wrote this play as a response to the political environment in which he lived. The story relates to the McCarthy trials. During the 1950's Senator Joseph McCarthy accused many American leaders of being communists. This lead to many accusations that people were communists. Some people believed him because they had fear of communism. McCarthy was, in effect, conducting "witch hunts". The Red Scare was a witch hunt where the US government was searching for "dangerous communists." Accusations came from left and right, much the same as the characters did for "real witches" in The Crucible. This meant that people were forced to either confess to the crime of witchery or shove the blame towards a different person. As an effect of this bias, the accused were never discharged, but were given the opportunity to confess to the crime of witchcraft to lessen their sentence. With the red scare, the accused were given a chance to give up names of other suspected communists to lessen their sentence as well. In both situations, there were people who confessed even though they had no relation to the crime at all. The majority, however, valued their morals and refused to give into political pressure by lying. This is shown as abuse of power. The puritans were a group of English Protestants in the 16th and 17th century. The entire plot of the novel is moulded by the repressive Puritan society. Like many puritan women, Elizabeth Proctor is dutiful and loves her husband dearly. Yet, Elizabeth is hurt by the fact…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John comes into the house, tastes the stew and adds seasoning. At dinner he compliments her seasoning of the meal. This lie shows how he does find fault with Elizabeth, but also that he will not be open and honest with her. There is an obvious barrier between the two that is demonstrated in the first few pages of this act.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What do you think about John Proctor? In the Crucible, John proctor was a farmer who desperately wanted to be the reverend. He lived in Salem, Massachusetts with his wife, Elizabeth, and three sons. John proctor is a dynamic character in the crucible because he wants his name to be good and have a good reputation, but he ruins his life from public reputation, he chooses to not admit to committing adultery, but eventually he does, and he becomes selfless and sacrifice himself to save his wife and everyone else in the court by the end of the book.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Proctor is a very developmental woman who during her most arousing epochs, has her moments in which she refuses to let go of the past, and proceed with her life as she begins to understand the clear motives of the hysteria, she flourishes in the aspect of love, care, and faith. She is a pure and authentic person who believes in all honesty and stays true to herself. When her husband John Proctor says “ Spare Me! You forget nothing and forgive nothing. Learn charity, woman. I have not moved from there to there, without I think to please you, and still an everlasting funeral marches around your heart,”(Miller 52) he refers to her empathy and her benevolence, which is stingy and frigid. She begins to realize that in her hardest moments her husband John Proctor is the person who has been there to accommodate her and he has not refused to be by…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play, The Crucible, John Proctor is a remorseful, candid, and an industrious man. The author, Arthur Miller, created John Proctor so the readers would like him. Proctor has flaws that he tries to fix, but still has a hard time with his wife, Elizabeth. Arthur Miller makes sure the reader still can see John Proctor as a likeable man after his…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller shows the audience throughout the play with direct and indirect characterization that John Proctor is eaten by guilt, and that he has things to hide.. Like in act he said, “ ...I should have roared you down when you first told me your suspicion. But I wilted, and like a christian, I confessed!...”(Miller 1164). John Proctor was a angry man who could not let go of his guilt and pride. He could not accept his wife Elizabeth”s forgiveness because he could not forgive himself. The author author also uses indirect characterization to show that John Proctor has skeletons in the closet which the guilt is hanging over him. When Miller says, “ In Proctor’s presence a fool felt his foolishness instantly- and a Proctor is always marked for calumny…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The moment in which Elizabeth tells a lie in order to save her husband’s life, indicates dramatic irony. The playwright makes this happen when first John Proctor calls Abigail’s a whore and, in spite of the humiliation he felt, revealed his affair with her. As Danforth cannot believe the seventeen year-old girl is actually a “whore”, he asks Goody Proctor to come up to test the truth of this charge. Before she enters the court, John swears Elizabeth is an extremely honest woman so when she denies his adultery to save him, there is a contrast as she is supposed to be trustful. They both risk their good name with the intention of saving each other’s life in different ways: John confessing his sin and Elizabeth lying. The drama and the irony are clearly shown by Miller in two relevant aspects.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics