Preview

Reason for and Against the Federation of Australia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reason for and Against the Federation of Australia
To the Editor of the Bulletin,
I am writing to draw your attention to the urgent matter of Federation and its unquestionably destructive effect on our people, our nation and our lives.
Federation is another scam of an idea aimed to undermine, smaller colonies, like mine Tasmania. By enforcing this notion iscolated colonies like South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania will be overpowered and forced to follow the rules of New South Wales and Victoria which is basically unacceptable. These new laws should not be enacted as people will have to become second best to the bigger nations and by doing so we will definitely be ignored, loose our say, our interests and our thoughts on matters important to us. This also means the laws our people have learnt, followed and set up will be wiped clean with new laws that we don’t have a say in, how does this help us, it doesn’t. Every decision that will get made because of Federation affects our lifestyle, what we know and love, our territory and the simple right to be able to govern ourselves. Once again Tasmania will receive the short end of the stick resulting in domination by Nsw and Vic based on the fact they are bigger, have more money and power, which is going to affect us deeply.

Federation means a new government will have to be put in place, which means more money will need to be sourced from the people in order to get it started. The fact of the matter is a new government means higher taxes for the working class and the need to duplicate politicians to fill more spaces. To achieve this new federation enormous funds will be sought after by the new Government in order for them to build new a new parliament, start a capitol, which will probably be in Nsw anyway and use money for petty little things like new furniture. It also means we will need to fill new political seats so every colony can supposedly be represented fairly, which is a fat chance. By doing this it means even more money will need to be sourced,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Australia's collective desire of nationalism as well as patriotism lead to its formation as a federation and this willingness to unify the divided colonies was a reflection of an ulterior, racist purpose. Federation is the act of constituting a political unity out of a number of separate colonies or states. Before Australia's eventual federation on January 1 of 1901, there had been years of debate, since the idea was first introduced in Sydney during an inter-colonial conference until its implementation almost twenty years later, on whether or not Australia should federate. Prior to 1901 the country was divided into 6 separate, self-governing colonies, each ultimately under Britain's rule and numerous politicians had been pushing for Australia to federate and after being initially rejected during a conference in Melbourne in 1899 it was later given Royal Assent on 9 July, 1900. There were a number of reasons that opposed the idea to federate. Fears of smaller colonies being overpowered, patriotic feelings towards a particular colony, the cost of running a central parliament would be too high, as well as rising hostilities between colonies. However the grounds in favour of the idea for a federal government took precedence, almost all revolving around a very prejudicial concept. Australia had a very strong sense of nationalist pride, the desire to become a unified nation. They wished to evolve from their origin as second class convicts and uphold the British way of life. This is reflected in their motives to federate: to create a unified immigration legislation to restrict the entry of non-Europeans and creating tariff barriers to protect Australian from foreign contest. Furthermore, supporters of federation reasoned that it was part of ones patriotic duty to keep the nation "snowy" white and that it was vital to maintain the purity of their race. "The Mongolian Octopus - His Grip on Australia," a cartoon published by Bulletin Magazine in 1886 was a mode of…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first Act of Parliament passed after Federation was the Immigration Restriction Act (1901), better known as the “White Australia Policy”. The intention was to promote a homogenous population similar to that in Britain. Under “White Australia” only Europeans, and then mainly northern Europeans, could immigrate to Australia.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From October 24 1889, Sir Henry Parkes has been considered the ‘Father of Federation’ and the first influential Australian to publicly press for the establishment of a new federal government. In his 1889 Federation speech, “the Tenterfield Oration”, Parkes addressed matters of national defence and a national railway transport system with a uniform rail gauge. He also proposed a national convention to progress the push for Federation. Parkes later added the issues of inter-colonial trade tariffs and an exclusionist immigration program to his proposal.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the idea of division of power between central and state governments (Madison Document A). In a compound government both the state and central governments must approve on the subject at hand for it too go into effect (Document A). Therefore not only one side is heard and can be made to help the people. Both governments share the powers to tax, borrow money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws. This provides for double security to the people because you have two different governments looking over these important powers making sure they are not misused. Federalism guards against tyranny because two separate governments are watching to make sure that the other does not become corrupt with its powers and the approval of both governments is needed to approve on matters (Document A). The state and central government are one compound government but two different distinct governments with equal…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The journey toward Australia’s legal independence has been characterized by evolution not revolution, hence the lack of any one event and consequently a particular date to celebrate Australia’s legal independence. No particular dramatic event marked Australia’s gaining independence from England, Australian independence was gradual and incredibly slow, and in fact some would argue that it is still not wholly independent owing to residual links and the continuation of a British monarch as the Australian head of state. Australian independence has been reached through largely informal progress with key moments being legal and political milestones enshrined in the statutes of the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia respectively. Examples of these statutes include the Statute of…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Wanna's Analysis

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dr Alan Fenna compared the Australian variation of federalism as both out-dated but somewhat useable in Australia in comparison to other countries. ‘While federalism has taken on a new lease of life in recent times, finding expression in or among previous unitary states, it has not been thriving in existing federations (Fenna 2007).…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia should cut all ties with the British Monarchy and become a Republic – Negative…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The draft of the Constitution was submitted to the states by congress in September of 1787. For the first time, the people were able to peacefully vote and discuss how their nation would be governed. Among the people, there were mainly two groups: The federalists and the anti-federalists.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1867, the foundations of Canadian federalism was established with colonies agreeing to be “federally united”("Intergovernmental Affairs - Intergovernmental Affairs") As a result of the agreement, Canadian federal system is divided into two levels of government, federal and provincial, with corresponding divisions in legislative responsibilities and powers (Leach 1984) The federal level of government has control over matters related to national defence, foreign policy, banking, criminal law, as well as Aboriginal affairs ("The Division of Powers") In contrast, the provincial and territorial governments oversee property and civil rights, hospitals, prisons, education, and direct taxation (“The Division of Powers). Since…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The subject of republicanism on its own may not seem intimidating to the wider community. However, when spoken in context with the separation of Australia from its monarchical foundations by amending the Australian constitution it is guaranteed to provoke a response. Such as the response made by Prime Minister John Howard who professed his opposition to Australia becoming a republic and suggested that it would not happen in his lifetime. Firstly, this essay will explore the legal issues involved in transforming Australia to a republic by focusing on such matters as the selection of a Head of State and constitutional amendment. Secondly, it will discuss whether such a transformation is possible during John Howard's lifetime.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism is defined as “the federal principle or system of government”. This concept of “federalism” is explored in Lowi et al and Zimmerman. These two sources list and define two types of federalism. The first type they list is dual federalism, the second one is cooperative federalism. One of the most distinctive differences between the two is how the powers of the national and state governments are defined, this ties into the classic struggle of Founding Fathers: How should power be separated between the states and the national government? Both of these systems are used in our Constitution, however, I believe our current situation in the United States best fits under the system of cooperative federalism. These concepts I will explore in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A federal system checks the growth of tyranny, allows unity without uniformity, encourages experimentation, and keeps government closer to the people. In this system, the people are one with the government so the people like the government and it prevents chaos. In the twenty-first century,…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Federalism Essay

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalism as we know it was created in 1789 as a response to the failures of the Articles of Confederation and the tyranny of monarchy. The founding fathers sought to create a system that cultivated ideas with states functioning both as innovators and test subjects, yet as time has passed federalism has dramatically evolved from the dual system it once was. As 200 years have come and gone, so has government evolved and changed throughout the year; similarly, public policy has tried to keep up with the epoch. In this the viewpoint on how federalism is in fact relevant today is argued, based on economic growth and quality of life.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Federalism? Well, Federalism is defining as the allocation of power between the national government and regional government; a system of government in which the power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units.…

    • 775 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics