Preview

Racial Boundaries in Burmese Days by George Orwell

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Racial Boundaries in Burmese Days by George Orwell
The British colonization of Burma created a racial boundary that had the Burmese dealing with white European supremacy since day one. It is evident throughout George Orwell’s novel, Burmese Days, that the main theme is the superiority of the white Europeans over the non-white Burmese. The white Europeans are extremely racist, sexist, and self centered. The social class system in this novel seems to be a two-tier system. The top tier being the white European elite, while the bottom tier seems to be the rest. The non-white Burmese people constituted the rest. These non-whites are considered second nature to the Europeans and hold such titles and jobs as peasants and servants. Elizabeth often refers them to as “beastly”. She is an Englishwomen, a niece of the colonialist, comes to Burma to stay with her aunt and uncle. The theme of racial boundary in Burmese Days extends also to social and sexual boundaries as well. The exclusivity of the European Club signifies the social structure throughout the book. The European Club consists of all white Europeans resembling a current day country club. This club is exclusive to only white Europeans. The members of this group sit around in the club and drink and belittle women and the Burmese. Sexual boundaries displayed in this novel are reproduced throughout the novel between character interactions. This mostly deals with the interactions between Flory with Elizabeth and a Burmese woman Ma Hla May. Women are perceived to be inferior to males in Burma. Burmese women especially are looked upon as peasants and prostitutes. Boundaries such as social and sexual, as themes in this novel, are just merely sub-themes that tie in together with the main theme of this novel dealing with the white European supremacy over the non-white Burmese.
The story of this novel takes place in a town Kyauktada, Burma. The plot and theme of the novel is surrounded by exclusivity of the European Club to white members only. Membership of this club

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel, we see that the characters are divided into certain distinct groups, which represent the major groups in general society. We also see the social divide between these groups, and while some groups are well represented in society, others are marginalised (i.e. they have barley or no social standing in society).…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (C) The women in this novel are dependent on men to handle political and economical duties. Today there are some countries were they prohibit women from attending certain events or doing certain tasks. In the novel, they demonstrate that females don't have certain power and that men do obtain. For example. in India and some countries in Africa , it's the female's task to stay at home and take care the children or not even attend school.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language” written in 1946 discusses how language can be used to obscure what one is saying. Orwell states that language can be snow obscuring details (2). He talks of how politicians use this to their advantage when trying to win the public's opinion. Some twenty years this is exemplified by the US’s involvement in Veitnam. The famous statement “We had to destroy the village in order to save” is what Orwell was describing in his essay. Although the origin and authenticity of this statement is often challenged it does does summarize the U.S.’s stance on the Veitnam war; meaning the use of deception through media, and the disregard of Vietnamese civilians wellbeing.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first illustration of both authors’ accord is the way each of them express sadness from the way they are treated by those around them. It is especially evident that Tan is saddened by the fact that her mother is poorly treated due to her broken English. Tan states “But they seem just as bad, as if everything is limited, including people’s perceptions of the limited English speaker” (179). This demonstrates the sadness Tan feels for her mother and the difficulty her mother faces to fit into society, bearing in mind it is nearly impossible to fit in with others if their perceptions are skewed. Orwell faces a similar issue throughout his essay as well. The natives of Burma were extraordinarily boorish towards Orwell simply because he was from England. Orwell shows an example of this by opening his writing with “In Moulmein, in Lower Burma, I was hated by large numbers of people the only time in my life that I have been important enough for this to happen to me” (229). Hatred from all of Burma for no good reason causes sadness upon Orwell, especially when all he wants is to fit in and not be ridiculed. Evidently when the society one lives in is not accepting of them it becomes a struggle to fit it.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shooting An Elephant Greed

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine that you have everything that you could ever desire. An expensive house, a loving family, influential friends, and anything you could want in the world. Then one day you see something that catches your eye. Suddenly all of your waking thoughts are consumed by that item. You are always searching for it, wishing for it.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell, George. How a Nation Is Exploited – The British Empire in Burma. Theorwellprize.co.uk. Retrieved February 20, 2014, from theorwellprize.co.uk.…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism is established by more economically powerful nations interfering with the affairs of a weaker country. While many white men may often think of Imperialism as a form of civilizing the savages of a foreign land, George Orwell condemns it and thinks of it as only a façade of power. In ”Shooting an Elephant”, he conveys the ironic, powerless and evil nature of Imperialism through the experience of himself as a young British officer shooting the elephant against his own will in order to maintain the image of the imperial power in Burma. This is shown specifically through the relationship between the British and Burmese, the portrayal of the elephant as well as development of the inner conflicts of the protagonist. The major role in…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Shooting an Elephant', George Orwell described the onus of serving with the imperial police in Lower Burma, during a time where the British police were hated by the natives. Orwell expressed his views towards the Burmese, saying “Theoretically—and secretly, of course—I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British.” Though he felt that way, they did not feel the same towards him. “As a police officer I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so.” He hated his job and felt that the sooner he got out, the better. Imperialism was something that he clearly despised, yet he was caught right in the middle of a cycle of oppression. One day, an event occurred that left Orwell battling with a decision between his own moral beliefs, and gaining the approval of the…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the double standard and as race played part in the bureaucratic town of Burma. The author unfolds the story that should he not kill the elephant, that had gone mad and killed a coolie, he must forfeit his authority with the local Burmese. As Orwell stated "only time in his life" he was hated, by large number of people because of his position" ...(P. 173)…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During a game of football, the Burmese continue to deliberately wear down and injure Orwell due to the fact that they know he will not step up and protect himself. Orwell fails to stand up for himself around the locals after being blatantly mistreated on several occasions because he fears embarrassment, resulting in him feeling humiliated. “When a nimble Burman tripped me up on the football field and the referee, a Burman, looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter.” Orwell is a minority, that is the bottom line and when you are the minority, you lack the courage to stand up for yourself due to the fear of humiliation. He feels powerless or out of his element, and in result is incapable of gathering enough true courage to stand up for himself. In another instance, Orwell’s courage is tested when he is faced with shooting the elephant in front of thousands of Burmans. When George Orwell is first informed of the elephant situation, his intentions are to observe the elephant’s behaviour and to ensure that it does not cause harm to the Burmese. Little does he know that he is about to be thrust into the spotlight, as nearly two thousand Burmans follow him to the scene. The audience hinders his ability to do the right thing, as his mindset changes to avoid humiliation. “The sole thought in my mind was that if anything went wrong those two thousand Burmans would see me pursued, caught, trampled on and reduced to a grinning corpse like that Indian up the hill. And if that happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh...That would never do.” George Orwell is under immense pressure during this time from the thousands of Burman eyes glaring at him. Orwell believes in the Burmans and wants more appreciation from them. Since the Burmans hate the British and Orwell is a British police officer, there is a great burden on Orwell to please the natives to…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subjugation of the women to this black matriarchy leads them to develop diminutive social spheres the author likes to refer to as “safe spaces.”…

    • 629 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burma was a relatively happy country for most of the nineteenth century. The Burmese fought the British Empire for years to maintain their independence but the superpower didn’t care that their future subjects desired to be free, and finally conquered them in the late 1800’s. England redrew the borders of Burma and made it part of India, even though Burma was a totally separate country with its own cultural and political identity. After years of oppression under a government that ignored their well-being, the Burmese of 1920 were sick of and dying under foreign rule. As a young officer in Moulmein, Burma, George Orwell was “an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so. When a nimble Burman tripped [him on a football field] and the referee (another Burman) looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter.” (216). After enduring bullying at the hands of the Burmese, Orwell’s main purpose as an officer was to appear strong and wise in front of the Burmans. This resulted in Orwell violently murdering an elephant to maintain an air of superiority. In sum, because the British government didn’t care about the Burmese, tensions ran high which led to…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    George Orwell 's three major books of travel writing--Down and Out in Paris and London (1933), The Road to Wigan Pier (1937), and Homage to Catalonia (1938)--revived the tradition of excursionary literature as social and political analysis. "Into Unknown England" books were initiated by reform-minded Victorian and Edwardian authors. In his three travel books Orwell, who casts himself as a representative of English "lower-upper-middle-class" and as an imaginary social conscience, ventured into the slums of Paris and London, the mining towns of northern England, and the battlefront of the Spanish Civil War, addressing what he saw as a largely conservative and apathetic English readership. Orwell sought to prove that class inequality and the corruption of progressive political ideals were, in his evolving socialist estimation, damning England and the Western world to social division, provincial bigotry, and eventually world war. Yet Orwell 's deep acculturation in traditional middle-class British mores and patriotic sentiments clashed with his sensitivity to class and racial bias. In particular Orwell 's travel essays on Marrakech and Burma (now Myanmar) are ambiguous but important examples of how literature that seeks sympathy with or advocacy for other cultures and groups also demonstrates how the identities of writers, their subjects, and those who read their work are constructed by intercultural exchange. These complications, coupled with the political inconsistencies within Orwell 's worldview over the course of his lifetime, have led to warring interpretations of his legacy. Recent critical debate has focused on Orwell 's reliability as an observer, his idiosyncratic views on socialism, and the degree to which his reputation for fairness, decency, and common sense are attributable to his insistence on empirically verifiable political and moral "truths."…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1984 Compared to Cults

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The books main themes include language as mind control and psychological and physical intimidation and manipulation. In the book, the people live in a city which is very out of the ordinary and also overseen by a charismatic leader, Big Brother. This society, portrayed by George Orwell has all the elements of a cult-like and totalist society.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British interest was obvious in the story by getting superior jobs and working in the government. As a result, it is very important to mention that the empire had produced several conflicts to the narrator that emphasis the unjust of Imperialism; one with the British Empire and the other conflict with the Burmese because of their bad treatment “I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make my job impossible. With one part of my mind I thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny, as something clamped down, in saecula saeculorum, upon the will of prostrate peoples; with another part I thought that the greatest joy in the world would be to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest's guts. Feelings like these are the normal by-products of imperialism; ask any Anglo-Indian official, if you can catch him off duty” (Shooting an Elephant, 13).…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays