Preview

President Obama's Speech: Close The Guantanamo Bay Center

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
President Obama's Speech: Close The Guantanamo Bay Center
On 21 May 2009, President Obama delivered a speech at the National Archives in response to stiff resistance from Congress concerning his intention to close the Guantanamo Bay centre. During his speech, Obama, who strongly defended his counterterrorism policies, made it clear: “rather than keeping us safer, the prison at Guantanamo has weakened American national security.” Keeping the detention centre open was “a rallying cry” for terrorists, making it easier for them to recruit more fighters, hence increasing the threat against the United States. Obama laid out his plan to transfer some detainees from Guantanamo to highly secure prisons inside the United States. On the other hand, he suggested “prolonged detention” for terrorist suspects detained …show more content…
His address took place one week after a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California, and three weeks after the terrorist attacks in Paris on 13 November, masterminded by ISIS. During his speech, Barack Obama promised to intensify airstrikes against ISIS. Nonetheless, his speech wasn’t intended to make part of a new policy or a strengthening of the counterterrorism strategy to the American nation, but rather urged Americans to not give in to fear, nor to marginalise the Muslim community. Interestingly enough, this speech was the third speech Obama had delivered from the Oval office, “a setting meant to highlight the gravity of a subject.” Barack Obama also laid out security measures that were taken at home and abroad to keep the country safe. Among them, he suggested tougher screening of travellers coming to the United States without visas and called Congress to ban gun sales to people whose name lies on the government’s no-fly list, but also to limit the sales of assault …show more content…
The U.S. foreign policy
In the course of history, many Presidents of the United States have defined their own foreign policy according to their view, ideology and the way they considered the rest of the world. Enjoying of the executive power, US presidents have a great impact on the policy making process. Most of them have designed during their presidency a doctrine, corresponding to their views, and consequently differ from each other. George W. Bush Junior and his successor Barack Obama have both restructured the political landscape of the world in the past years.
The foreign policy making in the United States is determined by two main bodies: The President and Congress, i.e. the executive and legislative branches.
The President plays the role of Commander-in-chief of the military and of the Nation’s chief diplomat (Journal U.S. DOS, 2000: 19). Nonetheless, he shares his powers with the Senate that approves the nomination of ambassadors and the ratification of treaties (Peterson, 1994: 220).
Congress also holds some of the executive powers relative to the foreign policy making. It has the power to declare war, to allocate budgets for the military, to call in the militia, it can reject the nominations of foreign policy functionaries and makes the laws (Slantchev, 2009:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The President also acts as the head of state and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. The Cabinet of the Executive Branch is responsible for enforcement and administration of the federal laws on a daily basis. Fun Fact: the Executive Branch employs more than 4 million Americans. The President is head of the state and also head of the government of the United States and he or she is also the Commander-in-Chief of the United States armed forces. Due to the 2nd article of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. There are fifteen executive departments and each department is led by a chosen member of the President's Cabinet; they carry out day-to-day administration of the federal government. The 25th Amendment deals with the succession to the Presidency and establishes the procedure to follow for filling in the office in the absence of the President. The 25th Amendment supersedes the wording of Article 11, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution and tells what the Vice President becomes the President or Acting President if the real President is to die, become impeached, or quits. The White house staff has a decent-sized role in helping the President and his decisions. The staff suggests ideas that the President would not have thought about, since they might not affect him as much as they would the staff. If the President…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, commander-in-chief is not the only constitutional role played by the president who, who has formal, enumerated powers (including, Chief Executive, Chief diplomat and commander-in-chief), as well as Implied roles and powers (World leader, Party leader, Head of state and Chief legislator). How accessible these powers are is dependent on the political landscape, but it would be wrong to say that presidential…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * The Executive Branch allows the President to carry out federal laws, recommend new laws, and direct national defense and foreign policy.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article II of the United States Constitution gives the president the role of ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of the US’s Armed Forces, and this role provides the basis for rapid and effective decision-making, whilst maintaining the credibility of the USA’s foreign policy on the world stage. However, there are certain constraints on the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief’. One constraint on this power is that only Congress has the power to declare war. Congress can also authorise the president to deploy his country’s armed forces. Since the Constitution was created, Congress has only declared war a total of five times (in both World Wars, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War), and this power has not been used since 1941. These authorisations are ordered by the President however, showing just how interlinked the powers of the president and Congress really are. One example of when the timing of a congressional authorisation can be crucial is the vote on action against Iraq, a few months before the 2002 midterm elections. This congressional authorisation was manipulated by George W Bush, and shows that the president can take advantage of this and make a decision with a Congress that has a majority of his party as members, rather than waiting until after a midterm when he might not be so sure as to have a key decision go his way. The relationship between Congress and the president was confirmed by the War Powers Act of 1973, passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The president holds the most authority as commander in chief than in any other role. While the Congress has the sole power to declare war, the president can send armed forces into a country in situations that are the equivalent of war. Numerous presidents in the history of America have exercised…

    • 1723 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy 315 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | The president's ability to bypass the Senate and create foreign policy directly through the use of executive agreements was limited by Congress in 1972 with the passage of thea. Case Act.b. Hatch Act.c. Congressional Budget and Impoundment Act.d. War Powers Act.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two perspectives on Presidential power are power as persuasion and unilateral power. Since Presidents’ power is to persuade, they have far less formal power than the necessary to meet the large expectations over them. Presidents take to office their goals and expectations for public policy, but to accomplish these, they must work with the Congress. Congress and the presidency were created to avoid one single institution from having control over policymaking. Presidents’ power involves the bargaining that derives from their position, reputation, prestige and reputation (Howell). They make their personal impact on the choices of what should be said or done, how and when.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Powers Frq

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Congress has the power to declare war while the President is commander in chief. This creates an ever-lasting battle for power when it comes to military action. Many times in history, the President has deployed troops without the approval of Congress, thus inducing wars/conflicts that Congress then has no choice but to back. It also goes back to Congress’ power of the purse. They determine the amount of funding that the Department of Defense receives. This leads to stark disagreements between one branch and the other.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama begins his speech with addressing the latest terrorist attacks that not only us, but other countries have gone through. The attack in Paris, San Bernardino, Boston Marathon, and the biggest tragedy, 9/11. Reading his speech, I began to realize that we do have plentiful acquaintances with bad people. But they are…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the powers that the President has is his ability to negotiate treaties although in order for these formal international agreements to come into effect, they must be ratified by 2/3 of the Senate. This means that the President needs to keep the senate fully informed throughout treaty negotiations to ensure that Senate is likely to ratify the treaty through a…

    • 963 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the twin towers fell and condensed to rubble on September 11, 2001, the Bush administration quickly formulated a plan to maintain the nation’s sense of national safety and security. John Lewis Gaddis summarized the administration’s directions to the public when he wrote, “Bush requested, and only partially received, what amounted to a global police action against terrorism, combined with a call for vigilance at home and abroad, combined with the suggestion that, despite what had happened, Americans should carry on with their ordinary lives” (Gaddis at 37). The citizens were to follow the example of former British politician Sir Winston Churchill; Bush believed the nation would best react to the crisis by applying Churchill’s words to their lives- the nation need to “keep calm and carry on” (Gale Biography In Context) while the administration began gathering intelligence and plotting their retaliation. In contrast to average citizens, Bush outlined what was later named The Bush Doctrine which said, “that the United States will identify and eliminate terrorists wherever they are, together with the regimes that sustain them” (Gaddis at 86). This meant the focus of the nation now weighed equally on the defensive and offensive sides of the scale. The Bush Doctrine outlines three core principles: preemption, unilateralism, and hegemony (Gaddis at 16, 22, 16). The United States has historically maintained defense for its people by eliminating or containing possible threats and if a threat becomes a reality, the nation retaliates, as it did following the bombing of Pearl Harbor. After 9/11, the government gained the authority to use surveillance and monitor communication through phones and the internet in order to avoid any other attacks of the same nature. In addition, “The administration also detained more than 600 possible suspects and announced it might use military tribunals to try alleged foreign terrorists” (Masci and Marshall). Despite the numerous…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * 1. The speaker of this rhetoric is the current president of the United States of America, Barack Obama. The thing that makes him qualified to speak on this subject is that he is the president and is in charge of the country. He is the person that gave the green light to Seal Team Six to make the move on the compound where Bin Laden was believed to be hiding. The only biographical detail that seems significant given the subject of the speech is that it is the president’s responsibility to alert the public on the major events that happen in our country.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under Article II, Section 2 and Section 3 of the Constitution, it outlines the powers and duties of the president. The President holds two main roles: he is the Head of State and is the Chief of Government. The powers and duties that fall under these roles are identified as two main sources of power; his expressed powers and his delegated powers. The expressed powers are specifically defined powers that cannot be revoked by Congress or any agencies without an amendment to the Constitution. The delegated powers are the powers given to the president by Congress. Examples of expressed powers are the authorization to make treaties, grant pardons, and nominate judges and other public officials. The president also has the power to receive ambassadors and command the military forces of the United States. The delegated powers under Article II of the Constitution state that the President “shall take Care that Laws be faithfully executed”. These powers delegate that the President will only have the authority to carry out decisions through identification and development. Out of every country in the world, our president is the only one with both roles as the Head of State and Chief of Government.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Located in Cuba Guantanamo Bay served for the U. S as a prison for illegal detention. The U. S by combating the war on terror at Guantanamo Bay is doing something unconstitutional. The main reason the U. S decided to use Guantanamo was after 9/11 in an attempt to fight the war on terror. The use of Guantanamo goes back to the Spanish civil war, and even when Cubans were sent to this prison by Castro. Guantanamo also is currently in debate on its closing.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    North Korea vis-a-vis USA

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thesis Statement: Obama hasn't immediately withdrawn troops from Iraq, and he's continuing Predator strikes against Pakistani militants. But his worldview is diametrically opposed to Bush's. And if the last eight years are any guide, that difference will be incredibly important. Obama's approach is strikingly different…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays