Power and Inequality in a Cultural and Linguistic Anthropolistic View
Centuries have passed and the different relationships of power and inequality are still present. Power and inequality have always been an issue and a topic of discussion among many different people in different cultures. Although much has changed throughout history, the struggle between power and inequality is still inevitable. There are many different types of power and inequalities ranging from gender to race and culture. Anthropologists can investigate issues surrounding power and inequality by submerging into different cultures and studying how power and inequality play a role in their society. Power and inequality still play a role in modern human cultures as seen by different struggles of cultures as well as the differentiation of linguistics.
Cultural anthropologists can investigate issues surrounding power and inequality in modern human populations as they immerse themselves into understanding the different circumstances of different cultures of today and of the past as well. Throughout the years, there has been a struggle of power and inequality between many, including gender and race. Gender has been an issue in many different cultures, and continues to be a struggle even today. In the past, gender issues have resulted in many problems. For example, after China passed the one child law, many parents wanted to have sons rather than daughters because of the thought that sons were more worthy. This however, has resulted in an imbalance of the male and female ratio as it has reached 144:100, in the rural areas of China (Peters-Golden, 2012). In modern society, it is evident that in most cultures, the male is still the dominant gender. In some cultures, including some in the Middle East, women are looked down upon,
Bibliography: Bulcholtz M., & Hall K. (1995). Gender Articulated. Great Britain:Routledge. Charlton, B. G. (1997). The inequity of inequiality: egalitarian instincts and evolutionary psychology. Journal of Health Psychology. 2, 413-425. Peters-Golden, H. (2010). Thinking holistically. In, T. Prowse (Ed.), Sex, Food and Death, Anthropology 1AA3 (January 2013 ed., pp. 35-39). Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 61-92. Smedley, A. (1998). Race in North America: Origin and evolution of a woldview. American Anthropology Association. Spitulnik, D. (1998). The Language of the City: Town Bemba as Urban Hybridity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 30-59. University of Washington. (2004). Linguistic Anthropology. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/anthweb/programs/linguistic.php).