POSITIVE ACCOUNTING THEORY, POLITICAL COSTS AND SOCIAL DISCLOSURE ANALYSES: A CRITICAL LOOK*
Markus J. Milne Accountancy and Business Law University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand Ph: 64-3-479-8120 Fax: 64-3-479-8450 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
* The author would like to thank Alan MacGregor, Carolyn Stringer, Gregory Liyanararchchi, Ros Whiting and an anonymous conference reviewer for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Thanks are also due to seminar participants from the Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, and to conference participants at the 2001 BAA Annual Conference at the University of Nottingham.
POSITIVE ACCOUNTING THEORY, POLITICAL COSTS AND SOCIAL DISCLOSURE ANALYSES: A CRITICAL LOOK
This paper critically reviews the literature seeking to establish evidence for a positive accounting theory of corporate social disclosures. It carefully traces through the original work of Watts and Zimmerman (1978) showing their concern with the lobbying behaviour of large US oil companies during the 1970s. Such companies were argued to be abusing monopolists and likely targets of selfinterested politicians pursuing wealth transfers in the form of taxes, regulations and other ‘political costs’. Watts and Zimmerman’s reference to “social responsibility” is shown to be a passing remark, and most likely refers to “advocacy advertising”, a widespread practice amongst large US oil companies at that time. Subsequent literature that relies on Watts and Zimmerman to present a case for social disclosures is shown to extend their original arguments. In the process, concern over the “high profits” of companies is shown to diminish, and the notion of political costs is so broadened that it blurs with other social theories of disclosure. Consequently, the positive accounting-based social disclosures literature fails to provide distinct arguments for self-interested managers wealth maximising. This paper also shows that the empirical evidence gathered to date in support of a positive accounting theory of social disclosures largely fails in its endeavour.
Keywords Positive Accounting Theory, Political Costs, Social Disclosures, Watts and Zimmerman, Advocacy Advertising.
INTRODUCTION Along with numerous other rationales (e.g., decision usefulness, legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory, critical or political economy theory—see Gray et al., 1995 for a review), positive accounting theory or the political cost hypothesis has been suggested to explain why firms make voluntary social disclosures. Based on the original work of Watts and Zimmerman (1978, 1986), several empirical studies (e.g., Belkaoui and Karpik 1989; Ness and Mirza, 1991; Panchapakesan and McKinnon, 1992; Lemon and Cahan, 1997) have directly sought to establish evidence for the political cost hypothesis as an explanation for firms’ social disclosures. Several related empirical studies have also sought to use the political cost hypothesis to explain other types of voluntary disclosure, including value added statements (Deegan and Hallam, 1991), disclosures by statutory authorities (Lim and McKinnon, 1993), and disclosures in pursuit of reporting excellence awards (Deegan and Carroll, 1993). Along with numerous others1, Gray et al., (1995, pp. 51-52) dismiss the positive accounting arguments and literature on the grounds of the underlying assumptions of the theoretical framework. As they suggest, positive theories are not about what (social) reporting should be, but rather about what it is. As a basis for change and improvement, positive theories are seen to offer little or no development of corporate (social) reporting. Gray et al. (1995, p.52 and fn. 11) go on to admit, however, having been persuaded by many of the critiques, that they have not seriously engaged this literature because they believe it to be “virtual rubbish” and prefer their position as “heretics”. On the face of it, however,...
References: Adams, C.A., W.Y. Hill and C.B. Roberts (1995), Environmental, Employee and Ethical Reporting in Europe (London: ACCA). Adams, C.A., W.Y. Hill and C.B. Roberts (1998), “Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour?” British Accounting Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-21. Alchian, A.A., and Kessel, R., (1962), “Competition, Monopoly and the Pursuit of Money”, in Aspects of Labor Economics, pp. 157-175. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, National Bureau for Economic Research. Ball, R.J., and Foster, G., (1982), “Corporate Financial Reporting: A Methodological Review of Empirical Research”, Studies on Current Research Methodologies in Accounting: A Critical Evaluation, Supplement to Vol. 20, Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 161-234. Belkaoui, A. & Karpik, P.G., (1989) “Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.36-51. Beresford, D.R., (1974), “How Companies are Reporting Social Performance”, Management Accounting (NAA), August, pp. 41-44. Beresford, D.R. & Feldman, S.A., (1976), “Companies Increase Social Responsibility Disclosure”, Management Accounting (NAA), March, pp. 51-55. Blacconiere, W.G., and Patten, D.M., (1994), “Environmental Disclosures, Regulatory Costs, and Changes in Firm Value”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 357-377. Blair, J.M., (1976), The Control of Oil, Pantheon Books: New York. Bujaki, M.L., and Richarson, A.J., (1997), “A Citation Trail Review of the Uses of Firm Size in Accounting Research”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 16, pp. 1-27. Cahan, S.F., Chavis, B.M., and Elmendorf, R.G., (1997), “Earnings Management of Chemical Firms in Response to Political Costs from Environmental Legislation”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 37-65. Chambers, R. J., (1993), “Positive Accounting Theory and the PA Cult”, Abacus, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-29. Christenson, C., (1983), “The Methodology of Positive Accounting”, Accounting Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1-22. Deegan, C., and Hallam, A., (1991), “The Voluntary Presentation of Value Added Statements in Australia: A Political Cost Perspective”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 1-21. Deegan, C., and Carroll, G., (1993), “An Analysis of Incentives for Australian Firms to Apply for Reporting Excellence Awards”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 219-227. Deegan, C., and Gordon. B., (1996). “A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 187-199. Deegan, C. and M. Rankin (1996), “Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted by the Environmental Protection Authority”, Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 50-67. Elias, N., & Epstein, M., (1975), “Dimensions of Corporate Social Reporting”, Management Accounting (NAA), March, pp. 36-40.
Engler, R., (1977), The Brotherhood of Oil, Chicago University Press: Chicago. Ernst & Ernst, (1978), Social Responsibility Disclosure, 1978 Survey, Ernst & Ernst, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A. Gow, L., (1991), “Resource Management Law Reform in the Context of Other Reforms”, in Morgan, R.K., Memon, P.A., and Miller, M.A. (eds.) Implementing the Resource Management Act, Environmental Policy and Management Research Centre Publication #1, University of Otago, New Zealand. Gray.R., Kouhy.R. and Lavers.S., (1995), “Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, Vol. 8, No 2, pp.47-77. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D.M., and Sinclair, C.D., (2001, forthcoming), “Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note And Extension”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Hackston, D. and M. Milne (1996), “Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand”, Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 77-108. Hagerman, R.L., and Zmijewski, M., (1979), “Some Economic Determinants of Accounting Policy Choice”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 1, August, pp. 141-161. Healy, P., (1985), “The Impact of Bonus Schemes on the Selection of Accounting Principles”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 7, April, pp. 85-107. Hines, R.D., (1988), “Popper’s Methodology of Falsificationism and Accounting Research”, Accounting Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 657-662. Holthausen, R.W., and Leftwich, R.W., (1983), “The Economic Consequences of Accounting Choice: Implications of Costly Contracting and Monitoring”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 5, August, pp. 77-117. Jantadej, P., and Kent, P., (1999), “Corporate Environmental Disclosures in Response to Public Awareness of the Ok Tedi Copper Mine Disaster: A Legitimacy Theory Perspective”, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 72-88. Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H., (1978), “Can the Corporation Survive?” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 34, Jan-Feb, pp. 31-37. Kelly, G.J., (1981), “Australian Social Responsibility Disclosure: Some Insights into Contemporary Measurement”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 21, No 2, pp. 97-104. Lemon, A.J., and Cahan, S.F., (1997), “Environmental Legislation and Environmental Disclosures: Some Evidence From New Zealand”, Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 78-105. Lim, S. and McKinnon. J., (1993), “Vol.untary Disclosure by NSW Statutory Authorities: The Influence of Political Visibility”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 12, pp. 189-216. Lowe, E.A., Puxty, A.G., and Laughlin, R.C., (1983), “Simple Theories for Complex Processes: Accounting Policy and the Market for Myopia”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 19-42. Miles, R.H., (1987), Managing the Corporate Social Environment, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Ness, K.E., & Mirza, A.M., (1991), “Corporate Social Disclosure: A Note on a Test of Agency Theory”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 211-217.
Panchapakesan, S., & McKinnon, J., (1992), “Proxies for Political Visibility: A Preliminary Examination of the Relation Among Some Potential Proxies”, Accounting Research Journal, Spring, pp. 71-80. Patten, D.M., (1991), “Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 297-308. Peasnell, K., and Williams, D.J., (1986), “Ersatz Academics and Scholar-Saints: The Supply of Financial Accounting Research, Abacus, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.121-135. Peltzman, S., (1976), “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 211-240. Press, E., and Weintrop, J., (1990), “Accounting-based Constraints in Public and Private Debt Agreements: Their Association with Leverage and the Impact on Accounting Choice”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1/3, pp. 65-95. Sampson, A., (1975), The Seven Sisters, Viking Press: New York. Sethi. S.P., (1976), “Issue-Oriented Corporate Advertising: Tax Treatment of Expenditures”, California Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 5-13. Sethi. S.P., (1977a), “Business and the News Media: The Paradox of Informed Misunderstanding”, California Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 52-62. Sethi. S.P., (1977b), Advocacy Advertising and Large Corporations, D.C. Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts. Shocker, A.D., and Sethi, S.P., (1974), “An Approach to Incorporating Social Preferences in Developing Corporate Action Strategies” in The Unstable Ground: Corporate Social Policy in a Dynamic Society (S.P. Sethi, ed.), Melville Publishing: Los Angeles, pp. 67-80. Sterling, R.R., (1990), “Positive Accounting: An assessment”, Abacus, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 97-135. Stigler, G.J., (1971), “The Theory of Economic Regulation”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 2, pp. 3-21. Tinker, A.M., Merino, B.D., and Neimark, M.D., (1982), “The Normative Origins of Positive Theories: Ideology and Accounting Thought”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 7, pp. 167-200. Tinker, T. and Puxty, T. (1995), Policing Accounting Knowledge, London, Paul Chapman. Trotman.K., (1979), “Social Responsibility Disclosures by Australian Companies”, The Chartered Accountant in Australia, March, pp.24-28. Trotman.K. & Bradley.G.W., (1981), “Associations Between Social Responsibility Disclosure and Characteristics of Companies”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 6, No 4, pp. 355-362. Watts. R.L., (1977), “Corporate Financial Statements: A Product of the Market and Political Processes”, Australian Journal of Management, April, pp. 53-75. Watts. R.L. & Zimmerman. J.L., (1978), “Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 53, No 1, pp. 112-134. Watts. R.L. & Zimmerman. J.L., (1979), “The Demand for and Supply of Accounting Theories: The Market for Excuses”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 54, No 2, pp. 273-305. Watts. R.L. & Zimmerman. J.L., (1986), Positive Accounting Theory, Prentice-Hall, London. Watts. R.L. & Zimmerman. J.L., (1990), “Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective”, The
Accounting Review, Vol. 65, No 1, pp. 131-156. Whitley, R. D., (1988), “The Possibility and Utility of Positive Accounting Theory”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 631-645. Whittington, G., (1987), “Positive Accounting: A Review Article”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 18, Autumn, pp. 327-336. Whittred, G., and Zimmer, I., (1990), Financial Accounting: Incentive Effects and Economic Consequences, Holt, Reinhart and Winston: New York. Wiseman. J., (1982). “An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures Made in Corporate Annual Reports”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.53-63. Wong, J., (1988), “Agency Theory and Accounting Choices: A Theoretical Framework”, Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 22-41. Zimmerman, J.L., (1983), “Taxes and Firm Size”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 119149. Zmijewski, M.E., and Hagerman, R.L., (1981), “An Income Strategy Approach to the Positive Theory of Accounting Standard Setting Choice”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 129-149.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document