WHAT HAS THE INVISIBLE HAND ACHIEVED?
Ross L. Watts Sloan School Massachusetts Institute of Technology
January 27, 2006
_____________________________ This paper was presented at the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales Information for Better Capital Markets Conference in London on December 20, 2005. I am grateful to Ryan LaFond, Karthik Ramanna, Sugata Roychowdhury and Joseph Weber for their comments. All remaining errors are mine.
1. INTRODUCTION When I was invited to present at this conference I was asked to address the question: “What has the invisible hand achieved (in financial reporting).” This is a rather broad question and an impossible one to answer using the evidence in the empirical accounting literature in capital markets alone. Accounting is only one mechanism in financial reporting and corporate governance and it evolved to fit in with other mechanisms, to be part of a general reporting, financing and governance equilibrium. The evidence in the international accounting literature is consistent with such an equilibrium (e.g., Ball, Kothari and Robin, 2000). Evaluating the market’s effect on financial reporting requires an understanding of the market’s effects on financing and corporate governance, an understanding of the extent to which mechanisms in those areas substitute for, or compliment, accounting and financial reporting. Thus, evidence on the evolution of corporate finance and governance is crucial to any assessment of the market’s achievements in financial reporting.
Another factor that is crucial in the assessment of the market is the legal and political environment. Markets require property rights in order to function. The nature of those property rights affects financial reporting. For example, the effective limited liability of joint stock companies appears to have influenced debt contracts and the accounting in those contracts and in shareholder reports (see Watts, 2003). When the political process produces changes in property rights, the market adjusts. When shareholders’ rights to bring litigation were changed in the US in the second half of the 20th century the market responded by making accounting and financial reporting more conservative despite the antipathy of the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) towards conservatism in financial reporting (see Basu, 1997, and Holthausen and Watts, 2001). The nature of financial reporting and accounting that evolves in the market is influenced by the political
process and as a result the market demand for financial reporting also influences the political process (see for example Watts and Zimmerman, 1978, and Ramanna , 2005).
The consequence is that the market achievements are a function of economic forces that determine both the private economic arrangements and the outcomes of the political process. If proposed changes in accounting standards and financial reporting ignore those economic forces and generate unverifiable accounting numbers and the market is unable to prevent those changes occurring and/or adjust for them, the market will tend to ignore the resultant financial statements and disclosures and find other ways to meet the demand for financial reporting.1
Understanding the market’s achievements requires an understanding of the market’s responses to the demand for accounting and financial reporting that is generated both from the market and from the political process. My objectives in this paper are to: i) explain the how the market has responded in the past to demands in the market itself and to demands that come through the political process; ii) derive implications for standard-setting bodies and others who want to change the nature of accounting and financial reporting; and iii) predict the effects of current proposed standards
To those ends the next section explains how and why private market forces have influenced accounting and financial reporting. Section 3 explains how and why...
References: Armstrong, M. S. 1977. The politics of establishing accounting standards. Journal of Accountancy 143. 76-79. Ball, R. 2001. Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services 127-169. Ball, R, S.P. Kothari and A. Robin. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 29 (February): 1-51. Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24 (December): 3-37. Beatty, A. and J. Weber. 2005. The importance of accounting discretion in mandatory accounting changes: An examination of the adoption of SFAS 142. Forthcoming in Journal of Accounting & Economics. Beaver, W. H. 1993. Conservatism. Working Paper, Stanford University (presented at the American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.) Benston, G. J. 1969. The effectiveness and effects of the SEC’s accounting disclosure requirements. In Economic Policy and the Regulation of Corporate Securities, edited by H. G. Manne. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute. Chadwick, J. 1992. The Decipherment of Linear B. Canto edition. Cambridge, U.K. Cambridge University Press. Daines, H. C. 1929. The changing objectives of accounting. The Accounting Review 4 (June): 94-110. Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting & Economics 18 (July): 3-42. Demers, E., P. Joos and R. L. Watts. 2005. SAB 101, unpublished working paper, University of Rochester. DeMond, C. W. 1951. Price Waterhouse & Co. in America. De Ste Croix, G. E. M. 1956. Greek and Roman accounting. In Studies in the History of Accounting, edited by A. C. Littleton, and B. S. Yamey. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin Inc. DuBois, A. B. 1938. The English business company after the Bubble Act 1720-1800. The Commonwealth Fund. Ely, K. and G. Waymire. 1999. Intangible assets and equity valuation in the pre-SEC era. Unpublished working paper, University of Iowa. Fabricant, S. 1936. Revaluations of fixed assets, 1925-1934. National Bureau of Economic Research, December. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 1993. Statement of financial accounting standards no. 115. Accounting for certain investments in debt and equity securities. FASB, Norwalk, CT.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 1995. Statement of financial accounting standards no. 123. Accounting for stock-based compensation. FASB, Norwalk, CT. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 1998. Statement of financial accounting standards no. 133. Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. FASB, Norwalk, CT. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2001a. Statement of financial accounting standards no. 141. Business Combinations. FASB, Norwalk, CT. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2001b. Statement of financial accounting standards no. 142. Goodwill and other intangible assets. FASB, Norwalk, CT. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2005a. Proposed statement of financial accounting standards (Exposure draft). Business combinations, a replacement of FASB statement no. 141. FASB, Norwalk, CT. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2005b. Statement of financial accounting standards no. 15X. Fair value measurements. FASB, Norwalk, CT. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2006. Proposed statement of financial accounting standards. The fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities (Exposure draft). FASB, Norwalk, CT. Finney, H. A. 1935. Principles of Accounting, Volume II. New York, NY: PrenticeHall. Friedman, M. and A. J. Schwartz. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States, 18671960. Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35. 519-530. Holthausen, R.W. and R.L Watts. 2001. The relevance of value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting & Economics 31 (September): 3-75. Hunt, B. C. 1935. Auditor independence. Journal of Accountancy 59, 453. Hutton, A. P., G. S. Miller and D. J. Skinner. 2003. The role of supplementary statements with management earnings forecasts. working paper, Tuck School of Business. Kehl, D. 1941. Corporate Dividends. The Ronald Press Company. Kellogg, R.L. 1984. Accounting activities, securities prices and class action lawsuits. Journal of Accounting & Economics 6 (December): 185-204. Kindleberger, C. P. 1986. The World in Depression, 1929-1939. Revised and enlarged edition. Kothari, S. P., T. Lys, C. W. Smith, and R. L. Watts. 1988. Auditor liability and information disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 3 (Fall): 307339. Lambert, R. A. 1996. Financial reporting research and standard setting. Unpublished working paper, Stanford University. Leftwich, R. W. 1983. Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. The Accounting Review 63 (January): 23-42. Matheson, E. 1893. The Depreciation of Factories, Mines and Industrial Undertakings and Their Valuation. Reprinted by Arno Press, 1976. McGraw-Hill. 2002. Enron used mark-to-market accounting to hide losses, ex-trader tells Senate. Inside F.E.R.C.’s Gas Market Report (February 1).
McLean, B. and P. Elkind. 2003. The Smartest Guys in the Room. New York, NY: The Penguin Group. Moonitz, M. 1974. Accounting principles – How they are developed. In Institutional Issues in Public Accounting, edited by R. Sterling. Scholars Book Company. Morgan, E. V. and W. A. Thomas. 1962. The Stock Exchange. Peltzman, S. 1976. Towards a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics (August): 211-240. Ramanna, K. 2005. The political economy of financial reporting standards: *Evidence from the business combinations project. Working paper, University of Rochester. Schipper, K. 2005. Fair values in financial reporting. Presentation at the American Accounting Association Annual Convention, San Francisco, CA. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 1999. Revenue recognition in financial statements. Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, SEC, Washington, DC. Vogt, R. V. 2001. SAB 101: Guidance on contract issues. Contract Magazine (June). Walker, R. G. 1992. The SEC’s ban on upward asset revaluations and the disclosure of current values. Abacus 28: 3-35. Watts, R.L. 1977. Corporate financial statements, a product of the market and political processes. Australian Journal of Management 2 (April): 53-75. Watts, R.L. 1993. A proposal for research on conservatism. Working paper, University of Rochester (presented at American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA). Watts, R.L. 2003. Conservatism in accounting Part I: explanations and implications, Accounting Horizons 17 (September): 207-221. Watts, R.L. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53 (January): 112-134. Watts, R.L. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1979. The demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses. The Accounting Review 54 (April): 273-305. Watts, R.L. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1983. Agency problems, auditing and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (October): 613-634. Weil, J. 2001. After Enron, “mark to market” accounting gets scrutiny. Wall Street Journal (December 4). Yamey, B. S. 1962. Some topics in the history of financial accounting in England 15001900. In Studies in Accounting Theory, edited by W. T. Baxter and S. Davidson. London, UK: Sweet and Maxwell. Zeff, S. A. 1972. Forging Accounting Principles in Five Countries: A History and Analysis of Trends 1971. Arthur Andersen Lecture Series. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company. Zeff, S. A. and B. G. Dharan. 1995. Readings and Notes on Financial Accounting, fourth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Figure 1: The operating cycle Source: AARF, ED 51B
Please join StudyMode to read the full document