Preview

Pharmagen Pharmaceutical Development Funding

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pharmagen Pharmaceutical Development Funding
Case No. 2: Pharmagen Pharmaceutical Development Funding According to the Accounting Standards Codification, the funding arrangement between Pharmagen (Pharma) and the private equity investor (PEI) would be applicable under the Research and Development Arrangements standard (ASC 730-20). This standard provides guidance for entities that are entered into a research and development (R&D) arrangement who acquire the results of research and development through the entire or partial funding by others (ASC 730-20-15-2). In this case, Pharma is receiving funding up to the amount of $500 million from PEI for R&D costs of the $1 billion of R&D costs Pharma estimates to incur for the development of their potential new drug X. This standard would be also relevant to Pharma’s case because the funds received from the PEI are restricted to R&D costs associated with drug X. No other accounting standard would be appropriate because the funds are strictly for R&D according to the Agreement. To determine the appropriate accounting for the Agreement under a R&D agreement, it must be established whether the entity must repay funds regardless of the outcome of the R&D (ASC 730-20-25-1). The PEI is obligated to receive royalties from Pharma not only with future revenues of drug X but also royalties associated with an existing commercialized drug. Therefore, Pharma must repay funds in the form of royalties to the PEI regardless of the outcome of drug X because they have an agreement to still pay royalties for an existing commercialized drug. If funds will be repayed regardless of the outcome, then a liability must be estimated and recognized no matter the means of settlement (ASC 730-20-25-3). Though the Agreement between Pharma and the PEI did not specify whether Pharma is committed to repay a liability, it can be assumed Pharma is committed to repay since the PEI is obligated to royalties. The liability would be recognized on Pharma’s books because they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pharmagen

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Acct 712 James De La Torre Professor Neal B. Hitzig Case 09-2 Pharmagen 1. Since there is no obligation to the nonrefundable repayment of the $500 million of funding and Pharma retains intellectual rights (no financial risk for Pharma as per ASC 730-20-25-4), it can be seen as a Research and Development and expensed as incurred according to ASC 730-20-35-1 because no future service can be made. The funding for product X is specified by the investor to be used only for R&D of product X which is not commercialized and not for a future project. The royalties that come from product X are not for a defined period. Product Y is for a defined period. In both cases, both aren’t measured as to how much royalties will be received and whether it can be estimated. Unless there is royalties, the investor gets nothing Since royalties aren’t measurable and are obligations only if product is developed and entity actually receives it, R&D are expensed as incurred for product X as R&D. Incremental funding has the same appearance to be expensed because no future obligation is required.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trueblood Case 09 2

    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pharmagen and Company XYZ have entered into a funding agreement The agreement states Pharmagen will receive up to $500 million funding for R&D costs as they are incurred solely for the research efforts of a potential new drug “X”…

    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Date: 4/11/13 Subject: ACCTG 642: Case 10-1, SolvGen Inc. Statement of Relevant Facts Direct Drugs Inc. (Direct) has created a plan for the acquisition of SolvGen Inc. (SolvGen), which is a publicly owned company. Direct has engaged an audit team to review agreement and procedures dealing with two separate material agreements. The first agreement is a research and development agreement and the second is a licensing and distribution agreement. The contract states that SolvGen entered into a five year research and development agreement with Careway Pharma Inc. on January 1, 2010. The agreement states that SolvGen will use its best efforts to develop a proprietary instrument system. They are expected to be ready for launch in the near future. SolvGen and Careway also entered in an agreement for a five year license and distribution. This agreement was entered in on January 1, 2010 as well. The terms of the research and development agreement state that SolvGen holds all intellectual rights that correspond with the research and development of the contract. Also with this agreement SolvGen is entitled to nonrefundable milestone payments from Careway and they are as follows:…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Pharmagen entered into a funding agreement with Company XYZ, an unrelated third-party private equity investor (PEI)…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sirtris

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * • Partnership with Pharma. As is almost always the case in biotech, the team was in…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Investors PharmaCARE’s investors expect to receive full disclosure of material information from publicly traded companies. This information includes financial reports, changes in senior management, and product delays. Management is liable to shareholders, owners, and partners (Dukkha, 2009).…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pear, R., (2012, January 17) Fees To Doctors By Drug Makers To Be Disclosed:[National Desk]…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cost of Capital

    • 282 Words
    • 1 Page

    Video Concept: Cost of Capital Pfizer is the worlds’ largest research based pharmaceutical company. This company faces many challenges are many challenges just as other major companies do. This company has an estimated $65 billion in world -wide revenue with market cap of $140 billion. The assumption is that the company has a solid financial portfolio, trading 8 billion shares daily, and retaining $7 billion in capital. The company does not fund project by project, it prioritizes the present products to determine which to fund first using a productivity index metric to measure the cost to manufacture the anticipated return on investment. As stated by Emmitt, each product bears unique risks. The patent process protects the company and allows the company to sell the product exclusively on the market. Team B will reflect on some of the corporate finance challenges faced by Pfizer.…

    • 282 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pharmasim Project

    • 3960 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Pharmasim Project 1. Executive Summary The over-the-counter (OTC) cold and allergy remedy market was highly competitive. There were already 10 brands targeting in different segments at the beginning of the simulation. OTC cold medicine is effective to cure 3 major types of illness - cold, cough and allergy which associate with different symptoms like aches, nasal congestion, chest congestion, runny nose, coughing and allergy. Consumers can be segmented by young adult, young family, mature family, empty nester, retired. The products were sold to consumers in various channels including independent drug stores, chain drugstores, grocery stores, convenience stores and mass merchandisers.…

    • 3960 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Year 8 Year 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000,000 $16,500,000 $18,150,000 $19,965,000 $21,961,500 First, note that the $170 million spent are sunk costs, they will be lost regardless of the decision. The relevant question is whether the incremental benefits (the present value of the profits generated from the drug) exceed the incremental costs (the $30 million needed to keep the project alive). Since these costs and benefits span time, it is appropriate to compute the net present value. Here, the net present value of DAS’s R&D initiative is $26,557,759.86…

    • 6653 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 21 Questions 1 through 7 1. On balance, do you think Merck is an ethical and socially responsible company? Why or why not? How about Pfizer?…

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Merck Kl798 Case

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Executive Summary Merck & Company has been presented with an opportunity to invest $30 million for the purchasing rights of an obesity and high cholesterol lowering drug, KL-798 from Kappa Labs. Based on the expected probabilities of success through each product-development phase for this new drug, as well as the costs involved, the net present value of the project is -$1.16 million and is therefore recommended that Merck passes on the investment. Sensitivity analysis also show that adjusting the probabilities of successfully passing each approval process to more realistic expectations has a drastically negative affect on the project NPV.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Merck & Co

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Executive Summary 1. How has Merck been able to achieve substantial returns to capital given the large costs and lengthy time to develop a new drug?…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck Case

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Retained earnings as a percentage of PBT = This should be maintained for this deal as well. Hence the most Merck could pay as licensing fee is = 37.84%…

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gang members may front (give the customer some drugs in which they have a certain time to repay the cost of the drugs back) the drug to a…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays