Preview

Pearson Correlation Coefficient Handout

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1480 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pearson Correlation Coefficient Handout
Understanding the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r)
The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) assesses the degree that quantitative variables are linearly related in a sample. Each individual or case must have scores on two quantitative variables (i.e., continuous variables measured on the interval or ratio scales). The significance test for r evaluates whether there is a linear relationship between the two variables in the population. The appropriate correlation coefficient depends on the scales of measurement of the two variables being correlated.

There are two assumptions underlying the significance test associated with a Pearson correlation coefficient between two variables.
Assumption 1: The variables are bivariately normally distributed.
If the variables are bivariately normally distributed, each variable is normally distributed ignoring the other variable and each variable is normally distributed at all levels of the other variable. If the bivariate normality assumption is met, the only type of statistical relationship that can exist between two variables is a linear relationship. However, if the assumption is violated, a non-linear relationship may exist. It is important to determine if a non-linear relationship exists between two variables before describing the results using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Non-linearity can be assessed visually by examining a scatterplot of the data points.
Assumption 2: The cases represent a random sample from the population and the scores on variables for one case are independent of scores on the variables for other cases.
The significance test for a Pearson correlation coefficient is not robust to violations of the independence assumption. If this assumption is violated, the correlation significance test should not be computed.

SPSS© computes the Pearson correlation coefficient, an index of effect size. The index ranges in value from -1.00 to +1.00. This coefficient indicates the degree that low

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For each of the correlational studies described below, decide whether the correlation is positive or negative and give two alternative explanations for each finding.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 5 Study Guide

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Determine the value of the Correlation Coefficient. [Remember that the r is the square root of r2] Comment on how well the regression line fits the data.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ANSWER: The obligatory r value is -0.149 and this r value is not significant since the p-value for this correlation coefficient or r is 0.424 which is extra than 0.05 or 0.01 and henceforth at 5% and 10% both level , the null hypothesis of insignificance cannot be rejected and the assumption is the r value is not significant.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The p-value or "statistical significance" of a result is the probability that the observed relationship between variables in a sample occurred by pure chance. As stated in the article, this means there is a less than one-in-10,000 probability of getting these same results if no correlation existed. Another statistical concept in the study was the use of a scatterplot to represent the data. A scatterplot is a summary of a set of bivariate data (two variables), usually created before calculating the linear correlation coefficient or fitting a regression line. The use of the scatterplot in this research study was to give a better visual picture of the relationship between the two variables and aid in the interpretation of the correlation…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class Hcs 465

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Neutens, J. J., & Rubinson, L. (2010) the key to most significance testing is to establish the extent to which the null hypothesis is believed to be true. The null hypothesis refers to any hypothesis to be nullified and normally presumes chance results only, no difference in averages or no correlation between variables. For example, if we undertook a study of the effects of consuming alcohol on the ability to drive a car by asking a sample of people to perform basic driving skills while under the influence of large quantities of alcohol, the null hypothesis would be that consuming alcohol has no effect on an individual’s ability to drive. In statistics, a result is said to be statically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by chance. In such cases the null hypothesis cannot be shown to be true. The most common significance level to show that a finding is good enough to be believed is 0.05 or 5%. This is that the null hypothesis is true. When the null hypothesis is rejected, but it is actually true, a so-called type I error has occurred. This means that there is no correlation between the variables, but the test indicates that there is. A type II error occurs when a false null hypothesis is accepted or not rejected. In most cases this will mean that results are not down to chance alone, there is a correlation between the variables, but the test did not detect this and gives a false negative finding. There is a tradeoff between type I and type II errors as the former can be reduced by setting a very low significance level, but this increases the likelihood that a false null hypothesis will not be rejected.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The hypothesis simplifies statistical results so that the use of one- versus two-tailed tests adds another element. One-tailed tests provide an alternate hypothesis that is directional. It predicts how the mean of the population represented by the first group will differ from the mean of the population represented by the second, so that not just the means differ. (Tanner, 2013) There is also another type of hypothesis test called a hypothesis of association which involves the relationships between variables. There are three correlation procedures that respond to the hypothesis of association which are the Pearson Correlation, the point-biserial correlation, and Spearman 's rho. When choosing the selection of appropriate statistical tests and evaluation of statistical results within the hypothesis of association it is important to note that in each case their possible values range from –1.0 to +1.0, and all their coefficients are interpreted the same way. Pearson requires interval or ratio variables that are normally and similarly distributed. (www.hypothesistestinganddevelopment.com) A special application of Pearson, the point-biserial correlation, requires an interval/ratio variable and a second variable that has only two categories, a dichotomously scored variable.(Tanner, 2013) Spearman will accommodate any combination of ordinal, interval, or ratio variables but will only…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    STATISTICS EXERCISE 23

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The r value for the relationship between Hamstring strength index 60o and the Shuttle run test is -0.149. This r value shows a weak correlation between the two variables, as it is less than the 0.3 threshold for significance. Therefore, the r value is not significant.…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment 4

    • 2820 Words
    • 14 Pages

    4. If the limits of the confidence interval of the difference between the means of two normally distributed populations were 0.5 and 2.5 at the 95% confidence level, then we can conclude that we are 95% certain that there is no significant difference between the two population means. false…

    • 2820 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The coefficient of correlation is 0.871. The correlation coefficient is positive so this indicates a positive or direct relationship between the variables. The correlation coefficient is far from the P-Value of 0.000. This means that there is an extremely low chance that Sales and Calls results are wrong and we can be confident in interpretation.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a) Use Excel functions (INTERCEPT, SLOPE and RSQ) to estimate the intercept, slope and coefficient of correlation (R2).…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. In testing the equality of population variances, two assumptions are required: independent samples and normally distributed populations.…

    • 6340 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * 1: positive correlation- indicates that we can predict that the two variables will change together in the same direction ex. Relating to height and shoe size- as one increases the other does as well…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several methods have been developed to determine and analyze association. Just as the rooster and the sunset can be charted, so can other variables. When analyzing the linear relationship of these variables, the strength of their similarities is called correlation. Basically, if two variables exhibit simultaneous movement on the chart, a correlation exists. A high degree of correlation…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If researchers want to compare two samples in terms of the mean scores using inferential statistics, they can utilize a confidence interval approach to the data or an approach that involves setting up and testing a null hypothesis. Whether two samples are considered to be independent or correlated is tied to the issue of the nature of the groups before data are collected on the study’s dependent variable. If the two groups have been assembled in such a way that a logical relationship exists between each member of the first sample and one and only one member of the second sample, then the two samples are correlated samples. However, if no such relationship exists, the two samples are independent samples.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Interpretation: - In the above table, the Correlation coefficient is 0.610 which indicates the positive association between the Organizational Communication and organizational policies. Which tell us that the communication in any organization is positively related to the policies of that organization. This means that changes in culture are strongly correlated with changes in the policies. Since Pearson r>.01 hence, the null hypothesis is rejected which is (H1f) and hence alternate hypothesis is accepted. I.e. Organizational Communication is positively correlated with Organizational policies.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays