Preview

Palestine Goes to Un

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Palestine Goes to Un
Palestine Goes to UN Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, plans to ask the UN for statehood and a full member of the organization in September. The PLO's primary aim is to regain some badly needed political leverage by forcing a shift in the cost-benefit calculations of Israel and the United States. Palestine's admission to the United Nations would, in Abbas' view, transform the conflict into a matter of one member state violating the sovereign rights of another. In short, Palestinians hope to use the bid to pressure Israel and the United States to engage in more equitable negotiations. Contrary to perception, the Palestinians are not seeking either statehood or recognition from the United Nations, but full membership in it as an existing state. The Palestinians UN strategy has been supported by two ongoing developments, both of which have now become essential to its success. The first is Prime Minister Salam Fayyad’s so-called state-building plan, with the aim of laying the institutional foundations of a future Palestinian state within 2 years; the plan has given Abbas certain strategies advantages, including an internationally endorsed deadline and specific criteria for statehood. The second, more crucial precondition for Palestinian statehood is national unity. Progress toward this has already been achieved through a reconciliation agreement that was designed to formally end a debilitating four-year split between Fatah and Hamas. Rather than viewing the Palestinians' U.N. bid as a threat to a moribund peace process, the United States should see it as an opportunity to reset a failed and severely outdated approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It should create a new framework for overseeing a credible negotiation process that is based on internationally accepted negotiating terms and is designed to end the Israeli occupation and create a Palestinian state within a firmly established timeframe. Short of this kind of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When you contextualize the issue, it’s evident that the Palestinians do have some validity to their grievances. One issue at hand is that the land Israel now occupies was once considered Palestine. The two civilizations used to coexist. It wasn’t until the mass influx of Jewish people following World War II when the battles over the region truly began. Following WWII, the Jewish Israeli settlers were given part of Palestine as a result of the persecutions to the people. It was done so by the United Nations on May 14th, 1948 in the following declaration. “By virtue of our national and intrinsic right and the strength of the resolution of the United Nations General Assembly, we hereby declare the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, which shall be known as the State of Israel” (Siegel). It was a reasonable solution--a two-state territory.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yitzhak Rabin had been a critical part of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process. He had signed the Oslo Accords earlier, which provided basic guidelines for Palestinian independence and where Israel officially recognized the legitimacy of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (Kimmerling 440), opening the way for…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 3and4

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page

    Israelis and Palestinians conflict will continue indefinitely until they forgive each other in order to move forward in peace. The primary approach to solving the conflict today is a "two-state solution" that would establish Palestine as an independent state in Gaza and most of the West Bank, leaving the rest of the land to Israel. Though the two-state plan is clear in theory, the two sides are still deeply divided over how to make it work in practice. The alternative to a two-state solution is a "one-state solution," wherein all of the land becomes either one big Israel or one big Palestine. Most observers think this would cause more problems than it would solve, but this outcome is becoming more likely over time for political and demographic reasons.…

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government, also known as The Oslo Accord, was signed on September 13, 1993 between Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization Negotiator Mahmoud Abbas (“The Oslo Accords and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process- 1993-2000 –Milestones- Office of the Historian”). The document allowed Israel to accept the PLO as Palestine’s representative. In return the Palestine renounced terrorism and acknowledged Israel’s right to exist in peace (“The Oslo Accords and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process- 1993-2000 –Milestones- Office of the Historian”). This also gave Palestine authorities governing responsibilities over West bank and Gaza (“Palestine”). The agreement…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goal: Zionism seeks to establish a home for the Jewish people in Palestine, secured under public law…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Camp David Pros And Cons

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    United States has shown that even though it is clear that peace in the Middle East will allow them to trade again in the Middle East, yet they were concerned about stopping the war. Therefore, during Camp David, United States played as mediator by not favoring one side or another as President Carter was leading the negotiations, and showed great patience and flexibility “The president himself acted as lead negotiator, shuttling back and forth between the two parties, and showing great flexibility in his approach to each.”. Moreover, whenever the Egyptian president or the Israel prime minister were acting stubborn or refusing to agree to the terms and conditions, then both would negotiate through President Carter and United States, “if they couldn't talk to each other, the two leaders would have to work through him. From then on, the U.S. would not merely play mediator, but would be an active participant in a pair of bilateral negotiations.” This shows how vital and sophisticated it was to try to promote peace in the Middle East and without the participation of United States, the odds of reaching to an agreement would have been very…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S gave land to the jews so they could live together in peace.Palestinians are echausted, desperate and very angry because of the israelis occupation…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are two solutions to the problem, the one-state solution and the two-state solution. The one-state solution would combine Israel, the Gaza strip and the West Bank into one country. There are two sides to this solution. One of them is favored by some Palestinians, creating a single democratic country where Arab Muslims would outnumber Jews. This would essentially end Israel as a Jewish state as the identity would be washed out with the Palestinian Arab population. The other side is favored by some Israelis. This involves Israel taking control of the West Bank and forcing out the Palestinians or taking away their right to vote. However, this has been rejected by many, including Zionists, the extremist Jewish group, as it is a human rights violation. The two-state solution is exactly what it sounds like, a separate Israel and separate Palestine. This would satisfy both the Israelis and Palestinians as both countries run separately. This two-state solution “has been the goal of the international community for decades, dating back to the 1947 UN Partition Plan, and many nations say that it is the only way out of the conflict,” according to Oren Liebermann, Angela Dewan, and Lauren Said-Moorhouse of CNN. However, the inability of Israelis and Palestinians to decide on terms of a two-state solution poses interest in a one-state solution, partially since if the two sides…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It was a hot, summer night; throngs of angry protestors swarmed around the gates of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, chanting slogans denouncing the government, which changed to chants of “Medinat Mistarah” – or, “Police State” in English -- any time the police attempted to quash the protest and expel the masses from the grounds. The air was charged with utter disbelief; protestors felt the sting of their government’s shocking betrayal. The cause? Announcement of the Oslo Accords, or “The Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements” (DOP), as it is formally known. This agreement, between the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)1 -- headed by arch-enemy Yasser Arafat, a man long considered a terrorist and responsible for unspeakable horrors against Israeli civilians -- represented official recognition by Israel of the PLO, now known as the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) Fatah party. Jerusalemites sang the famous “Yerushaliyim Shel Zahav” (Jerusalem of Gold – the victory song of Jerusalem’s reunification, written by Naomi Shemer and made famous by singer Ofra Haza2) while lamenting the eventuality of its lyric’s relevance fading into history. Yet the unbelievable occurred: the Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated, instantly derailing the momentum towards peace. Subsequent prime ministers have attempted to finish Rabin’s work, and all have failed. With each passing day, the dream of peace slips further away; the death of Rabin constituted the death of Oslo.…

    • 2047 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Palestine, or is it Israel? Either way, it is a highly contested land between two major Semitic groups: the Arabs, and the Hebrews. From the late 19th century, and throughout the 20th century it has been the focal point of Arab nationalism and Jewish Zionism. Today, it has become the Jewish state of Israel with occupied Palestinian Territories called the West Bank, which lies on the West side of the Jordan River, and the Gaza Strip, which borders Israel and Egypt. But, should the Palestinians deserve a state of their own? This essay will investigate the Palestinian side of the argument, their Biblical and Quranic ties to the land, the State of Palestine should have been created under Jordanian Egyptian as well as Israeli occupation of the land, and finally Israel’s poor relations with Palestine and colonial occupation of the land has led to the formation of many radical groups.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Israel vs. Palestine

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Along the south-eastern most reaches of the Mediterranean lies a land filled with historical dispute as to what group of people rightfully claims it as its own. The landmass known as Israel has been fought and bickered over for centuries by Jewish and Arabic residents, without concrete resolution. Also, the owners of that land realize power they only have because of certain circumstance; one of the biggest reasons the Jewish state of Israel has the power it has and hasn't been invaded by its neighbors is the relationship it has with the United States. Because of reasons not truly earned, Israel is under Jewish jurisdiction and protected by the UN and the United States, virtually untouchable to surrounding nations who would love to give Israel back to its equitable proprietors. The Jewish population deserves to have a state of its own to govern, but that land should not lie on territory already largely populated by another people; Israel should be shared with Palestine.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Opinion Writing

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Type your response here: When Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas announced that he would seek recognition from the United Nations for a Palestinian state, Israel complained that Abbas should have pursued that objective in face-to-face peace negotiations and warned of grave consequences, threatening to expand settlements or even to "cancel" the peace process altogether. Now that the General Assembly has upgraded the Palestinians' status — from "observer entity" to "nonmember state" — the Israelis are proceeding in a dangerous and self-defeating way.…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zionism's Greatest Conceit

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    United Nations Special Committee on Palestine; report to the General Assembly, A/364, September 3, 1947…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Israel Position Paper

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By creating a Palestinian state several of the Middle East issues could be solved. One of the major problems between these two sides is the West Bank and Gaza Strip occupation. Israel has taken this territory as theirs since the 6-day war. From that time on Israel has build and grow its population about 220,000 (In a Nutshell: Israeli Palestinian Conflict P. 2). This has been mostly in the West Bank. As a result Palestinians insist withdrawal from the territory. In the Camp David Accord Israel agreed on giving full Palestinian control over the Gaza Strip and most of the West Bank. These would certain conditions such as: The state would not have an army with heavy weapons and Israel would lease areas in the Jordan Valley or maintain temporary sovereignty over them for up to 25 years. Palestinians rejected this treaty.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Non-Violence

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the world is familiar with the on-going conflict between Israel and Palestine, and we are aware that the uproar between these two nations had been in the most extreme form. Judaism and Islam are two of the world's oldest and largest monotheistic religions. These religions share a variety of customs, beliefs, and practices. At the same time, there are enough differences that make these two clash. Although there are many conflicts going on in this particular moment around the world, I chose the ongoing conflict involving Israel and Palestine. I believe that unless there is a resolution of this conflict, there will never be peace in this portion of the world, and in order to bring peace, they need to use Martin Luther King and Gandhi’s non-violence strategy to bring stability in that region.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays