Preview

Oppositional World Views: Plato & the Sophists

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1804 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oppositional World Views: Plato & the Sophists
The Sophist views and beliefs originated in Ancient Greece around 400 B.C.E. The Sophists were known as wandering rhetoricians who gave speeches to those who could afford to listen. The Sophists deeply believed in the power of rhetoric and how it could improve one's life. Plato on the other hand was opposed to all Sophist beliefs. He viewed the Sophists as rhetorical manipulators who were only interested in how people could be persuaded that they learned the truth, regardless if it was in fact the truth. Plato basically opposed every view the Sophists held true and tried to disprove them throughout his many dialogues. The Sophists and Plato held two very contrasting views and this paper will attempt to sift through them all in hopes of illustrating each one. This paper will first focus on each group. It will begin by identifying both the Sophists and Plato and then citing the significant principles associated with each world view. This paper will then focus on how each component of their world views relate specifically to rhetoric. Finally, this paper will focus on illustrating each world view by way of current newspaper editorial. As noted, the Sophists were rooted in ancient Greece but traveled to many places, giving speeches on rhetoric to those who could afford to listen. Within their teachings, the Sophists focused on rhetorical techniques and how they could be used to successfully argue any side of an argument. They harped on the idea that through their teachings, self improvement could be achieved because those who controlled language had the power. The Sophists were relativists, which means they believed that an individual or society's beliefs, while true for that particular individual or society, might be untrue for others. (Bizzell P. & Herzberg, B., 2001, pg. 6) The Sophists referred to this as kairos and said that because of it, there could be no absolute truth because the truth was dependent on that particular person's point of view. They believed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In speaking of effective rhetorical persuasion, we must appeal to our target audience in a way that will get them to accept or act upon the point of view we are trying to portray. Aristotle said that we persuade others by three means: (1) by the appeal to their reason (logos); (2) by the appeal to their emotions (pathos); and (3) by the appeal of our personality or character (ethos) (Corbett and Connors 32). When Socrates, an infamous rhetorician, gave his “apology” to his fellow Athenians after being accused of atheism or not believing in the gods and corrupting the youth with similar teachings, he employed all three modes of persuasion to prove his innocence. Despite the imbalance of ethos, logos and pathos throughout his speech, I sustain that Socrates did make use of all three modes in his defense whether tactful or not.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a Greece philosopher lived from 384BC to 322BC. He wrote and taught many subjects in his career. One of his incredible writings included Rhetoric. Rhetoric is the art used to persuade or motivate an audience. Persuasion is an art used as a tool to change people’s belief, behavior, or even there attitude towards certain things. The Greece philosophers believed that to be truly effective to the audience you had to use a motivational way. The three ways Aristotle covered in Rhetoric subject was Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an essence, Plato found rhetoric to be bad because of the five problems being that rhetoric is seductive, vague, arouses emotions, used for monetary purposes, and quality changing. In consideration with the persuasive nature of rhetoric being able to out the truth. Whereas, Aristotle believed rhetoric to be beneficial to democracy, due to rhetoric being a component in the process of finding the truth. The third classical Greek Sophist brought forth ideas of ethics. Isocrates believed that teaching for money was unethical, but emphasized educating the youth to give back to the community. These Sophists taught rhetoric in different forms, but all brought forth the groundwork for how rhetoric is practiced and studied today.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gorgias, written by Plato at about 380 B.C., is a Socratic dialogue focusing mainly on the aspects of rhetoric, and how it is used. Socrates, the main speaker, is having discourse in Callicles’ home in Athens, Greece. Callicles was an Athenian political philosopher back in those ancient times. The main character of the discourse was Gorgias, who was a Sophist, which meant that he was a teacher of philosophy and rhetoric in Greece. In this dialogue, Socrates engages Gorgias in a discussion concerning rhetoric, and what its fundamental properties were, how it was used, and why.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dialectic Vs Rhetoric

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    One more prominent figure in the classical history of rhetoric is Plato (428-347 B.C). Plato believed that the purpose of philosophy was to discover truth that should be independent of any special calculation of interest; he was suspicious of rhetoric because he thought it lacked any concern with a truth that was separate from the speaker’s interest. An opposition therefore developed in the classical period between rhetoric and dialectic (1), dialectic gave equal weight to both sides of an argument, while rhetoric was concerned with persuasion from a particular perspective rather than presenting a balanced point of view. For Plato, rhetoric was deceptive, because it only showed a perspective that fitted with the speaker’s point of view.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Moral Authority

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After reading Plato’s Apology and Leviticus 17-27, I found several differences in the way people are judged for the crimes they have committed as well as, by what are actually considered crimes or sins. I want to explore these differences by asking two questions to each reading: What kind of behavior constitutes as a sin or a crime? What is the source of moral authority behind laws and legal judgments?…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The accusers claim that Socrates is one of many Sophists who are “very good speakers. Indeed, they [have] reputations for being able to convince a crowd that up [is] down, that day [is] night, that the wrong answer could be the right answer, that good [is] bad and bad is good, even that injustice is justice and justice would be made to appear as injustice” (Pecorino). Furthermore, Sophists are paid for delivering speech and only care about winning debates and lawsuits more than anything else. Thus, most of them are feared and hated by Athenian people. Nevertheless, Socrates distinguish himself from Sophists by giving evidence that he “live[s]in great poverty because of [his] service to the god” (Plato 23b). While Sophists such as Gorgias of Leontini, Producs of Ceos, and Hippias of Elis charge fee for their services, Socrates never asks or receive money from anyone whom he approaches and asks questions regarding to wisdom and virtue. Unlike Sophists who are wealth and famous, Socrates is so poor because of his free service. In addition, Socrates’ intention is to help other people understand virtue and become wiser rather than teaching them how to become good speakers as Sophists do. Therefore, Socrates is not guilty of “[making] the worse into the stronger argument” (Plato…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sophists In The Odyssey

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page

    To support one's position in any matter, nothing better could be offered than a quotation from one of the works, which told of the gods and their actions. If an action of the gods could be found that was similar top that being taken by a party to a debate then that was evidence of the correctness of that action. Therefore, those who were the fastest and most accurate at being able to locate quotations and take them and apply them to a given situation would often win the debate, the contest, the lawsuit or discussion. The Sophists were very well versed in the epic tales and poems. They were able to find the most appropriate quotation to support any position. They regularly entered contests and those who won were given prizes, but no prize…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, Aristotle views Rhetoric as both a means to find truth on par with dialectics and an effective method of communication. Through the perspective from Aristotle, he is not as considered with rhetoric being a method of metaphor or a particular way of persuade through language tricks. As he relies on conviction to establish probability, he believes that truth is not just a matter of certainty. However, Plato insists on truth being a matter of certainty which could be disguised fairly easy by rhetorical…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the republic of plato

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before I started reading Plato's the Republic, I was loathe to admit that reading those philosophy books were gonna really change how I view myself. It was totally a waste of time to read these vague and complicated books. As I went on reading the republic, I saw many similar things that still existed in our society. In the book, Plato prescribes severe dictates concerning the cultural life of the city. He rules out all poverty, with the exception of hymns to the gods and eulogies for the famous, and places restraints on painting and architecture. Does this look like "Cultural Revolution" that happened in China in late 60s in twentieth century? There are differences though, which is how the leaders see the results of the destruction of human civilization. Plato expresses regret at these aesthetic sacrifices, he feels they must be made for the sake of education, which transforms the unhealthy luxurious city into a pure and just city. However, our great leader didn't see any ruinous effects on our society until he reached the end of his life.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) Comparing Aristotle defense of rhetoric with the one made by Gorgias in Plato text, it is clear that Aristotle builds Plato’s ideas , but both views differ. For example, Aristotle assumes that man's basic nature is good and rational, while Plato believes that man is in need of instruction…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As time progressed Aristotle become famous for the “Art of Rhetoric.” It began to become incorporated by leaders and religious authorities. Converting people to a certain belief required some form of persuasion. The use of Aristotle’s rhetoric proved to be invaluable in conversion. Leaders were able to use the three powers to change and shape their subject’s perspective of the world. Rhetoric was evolving quickly at this point. It was still only used by figures in authority but did become second nature to…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sophocles was known for his emphasis on the individual’s uncompromising search for truth, particularly in “Oedipus Rex.” In Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” he, similarly to Sophocles, illustrates man’s pursuit of truth and what that means. Plato suggests that truth is subjective to each man. But what is truer? What is illusion and what is reality? Just because something is illusion for one man does not make it falsehood for the other. “To them, I said, the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images” (Plato). The story of Oedipus offers a lot of examples of the philosophy that Plato poses in his dialogue. In both works, the men first had to realize their ignorance before they could begin to acquire knowledge and true understanding of the complexities of the human condition; Oedipus in a literal sense and the man in the cave in a more theoretical sense. Oedipus discovers, after piercing out his eyes, that he has finally arrived at the truth of his life and that he now has a responsibility to share his story with his children, extended family, and citizens. And in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave," the prisoner's difficulty discovering the truth lies in his unfortunate restricted life within the cave. And when he escapes, he feels compelled to enlighten others with the newly found truth he has stumbled upon. “And when he remembered his old habitation, and the wisdom of the cave and his fellow prisoners, do you not suppose that he would felicitate himself on the charge and pity them?” (Plato) “Oedipus Rex” and Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” are works about truth and falsehood, about sight and blindness, about light and darkness; all of which represent the great divide between illusion and reality. Oedipus is blinded by the illusion that he has fled his fate, having overcome the prophecy. He thinks he has escaped his parents, and this illusion…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Republic

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Plato's Republic, Socrates goes to great lengths to explain and differentiate between the ideas of opinion and knowledge. Throughout society, most common men are lovers of sights and sounds. "Lovers of sights and sounds like beautiful sounds, colors, shapes, and everything fashioned out of them, but their thought is unable to see and embrace the nature of the beautiful itself (Republic 476b)." The few who do recognize the beautiful itself are followers of the sight of truth, the philosophers.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rhetoric

    • 2829 Words
    • 7 Pages

    These Sophists were teachers and public figures who were skilled in the art of persuasion. They originated from those who practiced oral traditions such as poets and public speakers. When the Greek democracy was formed, citizens stepped up to snatch the political power. Naturally, as seen today, those skilled in public speaking and who could make the most promises effectively and persuasively attained and held this power. Those who had the education, the sophists and their pupils, become the holders of all the power. This created a need for sophists and those who could afford had their…

    • 2829 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics