Preview

Rhetoric Influence On The Art Of Persuasion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetoric Influence On The Art Of Persuasion
What is Rhetoric? If you ask a college age adult that question the chances are that they will not know the definition of the word. Some of them might recognize it in as one of their freshmen classes but most do not know. The internet and social media has taught us to believe that rhetoric is for “old people” and nobody uses it any more. How then is a single video of police violence, taken from a specific perspective, used to influence the entire world and incite them into rage? If Rhetoric is such an old school concept why is it that most facts found online are false (LaFrance, Adrienne)? Society need to acknowledge the influence of rhetoric and begin to question any information given to them in this world of knowledge. The art of …show more content…
This was during a time of intellectual breakthrough. People realized that knowledge of the conscious was just as important as knowledge of the environment. For with knowledge of self came wisdom over the environment. A man by the name of Aristotle sought to delve into this realm of thought. With the help of another philosopher, Isocrates (Enos, Richard Leo), Aristotle came up with a system of laws that would in theory manipulate the thoughts of others. Aristotle based his rhetoric upon three main powers called the Powers of Persuasion. The first power was pathos, the ability to empathize with another persons emotions. Next came logos, an appeal to the intellectual, fact seeking side of a person. Finally there was Ethos, an appeal to a persons beliefs and goals. He theorized that with the intelligent use of all three Powers a person could persuade an audience of …show more content…
In order for him to create this weapon he needs three key ingredients. The first is the metal, the foundation for what is to come. Without a good quality metal the sword is easily shattered. This is the ethos, a persons beliefs and goals. The second ingredient is the fire for without fire the blacksmith cannot temper and shape the blade to his design. This is the pathos, the passions and emotions of the individual. The finally come the tools. These tools help solidify the shape of the steel. They fuse pieces of metal together to create the finished product. This is the logos, the intellectual side of a person. It cements in the mind the validity of the argument. These ingredients individually cannot accomplish much. Once they are forged together however, their power grows exponentially. A well made sword can destroy a man. A well made argument and destroy nations. As time progressed Aristotle become famous for the “Art of Rhetoric.” It began to become incorporated by leaders and religious authorities. Converting people to a certain belief required some form of persuasion. The use of Aristotle’s rhetoric proved to be invaluable in conversion. Leaders were able to use the three powers to change and shape their subject’s perspective of the world. Rhetoric was evolving quickly at this point. It was still only used by figures in authority but did become second nature to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a Greece philosopher lived from 384BC to 322BC. He wrote and taught many subjects in his career. One of his incredible writings included Rhetoric. Rhetoric is the art used to persuade or motivate an audience. Persuasion is an art used as a tool to change people’s belief, behavior, or even there attitude towards certain things. The Greece philosophers believed that to be truly effective to the audience you had to use a motivational way. The three ways Aristotle covered in Rhetoric subject was Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advertising companies constantly struggle with ways in which to differentiate themselves. “The more messages they create the more they have to create to reach us; it has led us to a vicious circle of clutter”. Companies strive to “break through the clutter”, which in turn just creates more of a mess. Companies use tactics such as guerilla marketing, an alternative plan to grab consumer’s attention. This method takes an “in your face” approach, something out of the ordinary. In “The Persuaders”, Frontline discusses such techniques and companies’ approach to influence consumers.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an essence, Plato found rhetoric to be bad because of the five problems being that rhetoric is seductive, vague, arouses emotions, used for monetary purposes, and quality changing. In consideration with the persuasive nature of rhetoric being able to out the truth. Whereas, Aristotle believed rhetoric to be beneficial to democracy, due to rhetoric being a component in the process of finding the truth. The third classical Greek Sophist brought forth ideas of ethics. Isocrates believed that teaching for money was unethical, but emphasized educating the youth to give back to the community. These Sophists taught rhetoric in different forms, but all brought forth the groundwork for how rhetoric is practiced and studied today.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three types of power enhanced by an understanding of rhetoric are: personal power, psychological power and political power (Herrick, pp.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), the word rhetoric is defined by being the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing. In The Rhetoric by Aristotle, the use of the word rhetoric explained throughout the whole text with details and point of views which interact with human beings. Aristotle explains how the art of persuasion is striving to enter out lives and how people are shaped into just seeing one perspective of a speech topic. Right from Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Aristotle claims “Rhetoric is the counterpart of Dialectic. Both alike are concerned with such things as come, more or less, within the general ken of all men and belong to no definite science” (Aristotle 53). What Aristotle means by this quote is that the rhetoric used is equally defined by the term of dialect. Dialect is the way a topic is discussed using logical advantages. The logical advantages provide a…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. Are emotional appeals in persuasive writing ethical? Why or why not. (This should be an interesting discussion – much to talk about!)…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Persuaders The persuading industry of advertising has increased considerably through the years. The multimillionaire advertising industries have been persuading people to do that by bombarding them with advertising everywhere. Everywhere you look there are ads. It may be in magazines, newspapers, TV commercials, or websites.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dialectic Vs Rhetoric

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    One more prominent figure in the classical history of rhetoric is Plato (428-347 B.C). Plato believed that the purpose of philosophy was to discover truth that should be independent of any special calculation of interest; he was suspicious of rhetoric because he thought it lacked any concern with a truth that was separate from the speaker’s interest. An opposition therefore developed in the classical period between rhetoric and dialectic (1), dialectic gave equal weight to both sides of an argument, while rhetoric was concerned with persuasion from a particular perspective rather than presenting a balanced point of view. For Plato, rhetoric was deceptive, because it only showed a perspective that fitted with the speaker’s point of view.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric it something used all over the world and most are not even aware of the world. People use rhetoric so often it become second nature for most in everyday life even children use rhetoric to get what they want. Rhetoric is the use of world in persuasive speech, and writing. Letting the recipient of the speech or paper persuade the emotions or believes sway common reasoning to what author or speaker wants. When someone is using persuasion they need to use three basic principles Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. With the videos provided an in depths look on how rhetoric use all three of these principals.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric – any PUBLIC symbolic expression that creates meaning in society which, in turn, helps us: make sense of our experiences, construct our identities and live our public lives…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nevertheless, readers and scholars alike continue to study these antiquity pieces into the modern age. Despite of their clashing prospects, the two share a commonality in that they both contain entheymatic arguments that which engage the emotions of their audiences to persuade them into believing their appointed arguments. By examining how each writer, Chief Seattle and John Locke structured their works in relation to the appeal of their intended audience, this paper will show how Chief Seattle’s ‘Speech to the U.S President’ proves to be the more effective enthymematic argument rather than John Locke’s ‘Of Property’. This claim will be supported through Aristotle’s definition and favor of the enthymeme as a crucial feature in the study of rhetoric. By means of Aristotle’s of description of the enthymeme and critical analysis of each work, evidence will validate that Chief Seattle’s speech proves to be the most…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump Rhetoric

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Famous philosopher and poet, Aristotle, once described, “[rhetoric] may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art.” Thus, rhetoric is a form of clear, perceptible language which leads its observers to make a specific and calculated conclusion. Many consider politicians to be the most avid users of rhetoric, constantly trying to convince audiences to vote or certain way or to shift the national political agenda in a direction that fits their means. In many cases, politicians are accused of being liars or untruthful for doing so. Contrary, others consider politicians to be masters of languages, constantly formulating methods to make their arguments more…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rhetorical appeal that was mainly used in this article is logos, which convinces the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language and Persuasion

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Language is how we get our opinions across. Language is how we make others understand our ideas. It is essential that other people understand what we are trying to impress upon them. Language can be verbal or non-verbal and one is just as important as the other. Word choice is as important as well. Poor word choice can lead to miscommunication between parties and defeats the purpose of communication. Knowing the level of the audience’s understanding is the most important part of language communication. You would not use collegiate word to covey a point to a toddler, nor would you use spoken words to someone who could not hear them. The role language and language diversity plays in the critical thinking process is to persuade, to inform, or to describe. Language is used to persuade others to think and act the way that we do. It is also used to inform others of needed information, or to describe something to someone else. Language diversity is important because as seen in the metaphors listed above, in our language words have many meanings. One needs to understand that and choose words accordingly. Society is made up of people who speak many different languages, so non-verbal language is helpful when trying to get over the language barrier.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics