Preview

Ophelia Syndrome Commentary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ophelia Syndrome Commentary
Karl Jung was a Swiss psychiatrist and called the founder of analytical psychology1; he described “individuation” as “the process of learning to differentiate oneself from others…. It means to discover those aspects of the self that distinguish one person from another. (p. 2)” Essentially, he states that individuation is the metaphorical DNA of one’s personality; without individuation, we would all be the same—drones, rendered unnecessary.
As described by Plummer, Ophelia Syndrome is the inability to think or act for ourselves. Those suffering from Ophelia Syndrome are incapable of producing original thought or coping with the unknown. They would rather be safely misled than creatively uncertain.
Plummer stated that Ophelia Syndrome was most commonly manifested in university students and “middle managers in American corporations” (p. 3). He attributes this to lack of individuation—or rather, the inability to learn to think for ourselves. It comes from being too reliant- on our boss, on our professor, on our parents, etc.
Plummer described a great teacher as “[having] a reputation among students”, as “challenging, fair and tough”. He says that they must be a “partner in learning” and that “they refuse to do your thinking for you” (p. 3). I find his appraisal accurate due mainly to the very title “teacher”. A teacher must to exactly that- teach. A teacher guides and supervises and corrects when necessary, but a student cannot become a scholar without
Hamlet stated, “…there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so” (II.ii.254-255) and follows that with “What a piece of work is man! how noble in reason! how infinite in faculty!... in apprehension how like a god!” (II.ii.314-317). I thought that this was the best illustration of nihilism in the play and connected with it due to the weight given to the power of thought- a power given exclusively to man to do with as he wished. Through ‘the power of positive thinking’ or through negativism, we govern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ophelia Syndrome

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the essays of Diagnosing and Treating Ophelia Syndrome and Everybody is Ignorant on Different Subjects two topics are discussed which are related, in that they both have to do with learning and being able to think as an individual. The Ophelia Syndrome is not processing the ability to create one’s own opinion. Ophelia is a character in the play Hamlet. She is described as a helpless child and has a “Lord” or authoritative figure that forces her even lower to the status of an infant. The danger of this ‘syndrome’ is that we are forcing students to become clones without thoughts of their own, just mimics of the teacher. Instructors are now dictating what/how to think, and what/how to learn. When students are asked what they think they often become frustrated, silent or hostile. Thomas G. Plummer the author of Ophelia Syndrome gives 6 treatments for Ophelia Syndrome which include seek out the best teachers, Dare to know yourself, learn to live with uncertainty, practice dialectical thinking, foster idle thinking, and plan to step out of bounds. These treatments all help us to become educated people. The two most effective treatments are: seeking out the best teachers and daring to know yourself. Seeking out good teachers is important because it will be a better learning experience and will help you get a better education opportunity. Daring to know yourself is important because only you can push yourself to learn and remember things. It is also important because only you can know your personal learning style. The topic of learning/teaching has been a reoccurring theme in my life lately and it has influenced me to make goals and determine exactly what I want out of my education here. I want to use my time wisely. I want to seek out the best teachers and I want to learn, how to think and who I…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hamlet, Prince of Denmark has remained the most perplexing, as well as the most popular, of William Shakespeare’s tragedies. Whether considered as literature, philosophy, or drama, its artistic stature is universally admitted. To explain the reasons for its excellence in a few words, however, is a daunting task. Apart from the matchless artistry of its language, the play’s appeal rests in large measure on the character of Hamlet himself. Called upon to avenge his father’s murder, he is compelled to face problems of duty, morality, and ethics that have been human concerns through the ages. The play has tantalized critics with what has become known as the Hamlet mystery, that of Hamlet’s complex behavior, most notably his indecision and his reluctance to act.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet vs Sr Thomas More.

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the play "Hamlet", by William Shakespeare, Hamlet is described as daring, brave, loyal, and intelligent, but he is consumed by his own thoughts. Hamlet's duty to take revenge for his father's murder. This leads Hamlet, a philosopher not a killer, to search deep within himself for the solution to his plight. Hamlet's "pale cast of thoughts" has constantly undermined his resolution, resulting in his inaction, which, in turn, causes him deep unrest and depression. Hamlet's indecisive pursuit in avenging his father's death is shown as evidence of his tragic flaw. Hamlet repeatedly rationalizes and analyzes the ineffectiveness of his actions. Due to the uncertainty of the truth, Hamlet feels…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cynicism In Hamlet

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In William Shakespeare’s hamlet, Hamlet, an unresolved man, must take revenge against his uncle Claudius. Throughout the play he is stuck between the problem to act against the unjust, evil actions done by Claudius or to let nature take its course and deal with the problem in itself. Hamlet, unable to make a solution and pick between these two options, brings chaos to the state of Denmark, which results in more problems than those that were originally at hand. As an effect of his uncle’s actions and the actions of those close to him, Hamlet’s perception of a man is disillusioned. This disillusioned perception leads him to develop a very pessimistic view of man’s existence and also causes him to question the motives of others. Hamlet change…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet is generally regarded as Shakespeare’s magnum opus, sometimes it is even referred as the highest literary product of human genius. Critics have always been argued on the interpretation of Hamlet and even after more than 400 years, yet these argues still going strong. One of the most controversial that topic for critics since the beginning is the interpretation of the third act of Hamlet, where many critics themselves baffle because normal interpretations will make Hamlet subsequent actions irrational and impossible to explain. Many will use insanity to explain Hamlet actions. However, we will presume that Hamlet is staying sane throughout the course of the story. This paper is an attempt at interpreting the purpose and significant of…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet strips away the veneers and smoke screens that trap our minds, forcing us to confront the raw human condition in all its pain and glory. For this reason, Hamlet has never ceased to enthral audiences since its conception, and has been critically scrutinized for centuries. Shakespeare explores ideas that are universally understood: the human need for vengeance, human glory as well as human failings, and the unavoidable presence of death. Collectively, these ideas compose a deep probing of the human condition. On a personal level, Hamlet has been worthy of my interpretive study because it has provoked me to engage with my surroundings more critically, questioning established values, norms and codes of behaviour that had previously held my conviction.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Analytical Essay

    • 900 Words
    • 6 Pages

    the thought-provoking Hamlet, the inner thoughts of one’s own mind come to life, as it is…

    • 900 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any critical evaluation of the play “Hamlet” must be chiefly concerned with the character of Hamlet. Unlike Shakespeare’s other tragedies, “Hamlet” is singular in purpose and scope-it is the story of one man’s personal and moral collapse under the weight of his own (and other’s) decisions, intentions and machinations. The play is not complicated with subplots and extraneous secondary characters, but is wholly focused on the man himself. This dedication to a singular dramatic intention paradoxically makes for “Hamlet” to be, subjectively, Shakespeare most confusing play. It is problematic in its protagonists’ inscrutability, his missing motives, his contradictory actions, and his utter implacability to settle into one stable character. Almost everything he does further contradicts him as an individual in the world of the play and as a dramatic character. For this reason my critical evaluation of the play is that it is artistically self defeating due to its own subversions of character and dramatic convention, and this should render it unfulfilling and disappointing as a dramatic performance. Paradoxically, the plays confusion renders it all the more infuriatingly readable-it is both alienating and enticing, a work which defeats itself in its own realisation and at the same time is only worthwhile and meaningful in this artistic enigma-the individual components should not work, yet it does strike a powerful emotional and dramatic resonance in its completion. Many aspects of “Hamlet” as a text are easily criticised-it is certainly a work with a large amount of problems. However, in a rather subversive and mysterious manner the play is a wonderful work of literature.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Hamlet explores humanities complex processes and the condition of which we live. In this play, the concept of revenge is studied cohesively with the ability of humans to make judgments over their actions and human’s curiosity toward seeking answers. Shakespeare, having written this play in the 17th century, creates the protagonist Hamlet as a forward thinking character with a philosophical quality and moral understanding regarding his ability to reason. These traits conflict against the crude revenge task at hand in the play. Through Hamlet’s complexity, Shakespeare makes direct opinions about the human condition and what it is to be human.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    shakespears hamlet notes

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hamlet claims “there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so”, his delay or inaction is a central and ambiguous concern throughout the play. This key theme becomes prevalent in his soliloquies. The soliloquies are a dramatic technique, which provides an insight into the characters frame of mind, in this case giving reasons for Hamlet’s delay. The “O what a rogue and peasant slave am I” and “How all occasions do inform against me” soliloquies highlight the ways in which cowardice can prevent action. Hamlet reproaches himself for his apparent weakness and lack of action claiming that he has “but one part wisdom and ever three parts coward.” However the notion of Hamlet’s cowardice, made famous by G. Wilson Night who claims Hamlet is a “sick soul” who “infects the state”, is questionable. Hamlet shows considerable courage: when first informed of the ghosts existence he claims that he will “speak to it though hell itself should gape”, this courage also re emerges when Hamlet calmly confronts Laertes, his existential questions “to be or not to be” turns into the accepting “Let be”. Additional theories relative to the cause of Hamlet’s inaction include an attempt to prevent contamination: his delay results from an attempt to convert the Ghost’s injunction into action without being stained by the corruption of Denmark. Coleridge also approaches the notion of Hamlet’s delay stating that Hamlet knows what is expected of him, but he is constitutionally averse to action, his energy evaporates in self-reproach- “Hence great, enormous, intellectual activity, and a consequent proportionate aversion to real action.” The 1948, Laurence Olivier film echoes this statement, it’s opening title stating “This is the tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind”. This sentiment however is not supported in the text. Hamlet shows that he is capable of making up his mind, often in rash and unthinking ways, such as the murders of Polonius, Rosencrantz and…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mind and Hamlet

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shakespeare’s texts have been re-visited, re-interpreted and re-invented to suit the context and preferences of an evolving audience, and it through this constant recreation it is evident that Hamlet “does not define or exhaust its possibilities”. Through the creation of a character who emulates a variety of different themes, such as revenge, realisation of reality and the questioning of humanity, we can see the different possibilities within Hamlet as an “admirable text” with enduring human value. Furthermore, the emotional journey of Hamlet and his progression of madness provide further opportunity for differing interpretations. Hamlet connects with audiences from a variety of socio-historic contexts primarily due to its address of fundamental human issues and what it is to be human.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet 's self-description in his apology to Laertes, delivered in the appropriately distanced and divided third-person, explicitly fingers the greatest antagonist of the play‹consciousness. The obligatory cultural baggage that comes along with Hamlet heeds little attention to the incestuous Claudius while focusing entirely on the gloomy Dane 's legendary melancholia and his resulting revenge delays. As Laurence Olivier introduced his 1948 film version, "This is the tragedy of a man who couldn 't make up his mind." By tracking the leitmotif of "thought" throughout the play, I will examine the conflicts that preclude Hamlet from unified decisions that lead to action. Shakespeare is not content, however, with the simple notion of thought as a mere signifier of the battle between the mind and the body. The real clash is a conflict of consciousness, of Hamlet 's oscillations between infinite abstraction and shackled solipsism, between recognition of the heroic ideal and of his limited means, between the methodical mishmash of sanity and the total chaos of insanity. I repeat "between" not only for anaphoric effect, but to suggest Shakespeare 's conception of thought; that is, a set of perspectivally-splintered realities which can be resolutely conflated, for better or worse, only by the mediating hand of action. Any discussion of Hamlet, a work steeped in contradictions and doubles, necessitates inquiry into passages concerning opposition to thought, namely those of the corporeal. And, as Shakespeare engages the imagination of his audience primarily through metaphor, I will use "thought" as a catapult to critique sections that are relevant to my argument.…

    • 4393 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: In Hamlet, William Shakespeare’s title character broods over the fear of death that prevents people from escaping or confronting painful situations in life. His “to be, or not to be” soliloquy expresses both a desire for release from suffering or indecision and a dread that whatever follows will be worse than what he already endures. Thinking too much about the unknown consequences of death, Hamlet complains, makes us weak and passive.…

    • 647 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare's Hamlet, written around 1600, is one of the most problematic texts in all of literature. With the exception of certain Biblical texts, no other work has produced such a continuing, lively, and contentious debate about how we are supposed to understand it. In fact, one could very easily construct a thorough and intriguing history of modern literary criticism based upon nothing other than various interpretative takes on Hamlet (a task which has already been carried out by at least one historian of ideas).…

    • 12004 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Is Guilty

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Hamlet gave the impression of a crazed man, driven mad by love and death, his actions reflect a man of consciousness, ultimately supporting the idea that his intentions were known and he is guilty in all aspects. His rollercoaster of intense emotions are meant to appeal to the audience’s sympathetic nature, but his conscious doesn’t prevent him from committing future crimes and becoming destructive.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays