Preview

Offer a Critique of What John Rawls Meant by ‘Fair Equality of Opportunity’

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2175 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Offer a Critique of What John Rawls Meant by ‘Fair Equality of Opportunity’
Q. Offer a critique of what John Rawls meant by ‘Fair Equality of Opportunity’
Introduction:
The purpose of this essay is to discuss what ‘Fair Equality of Opportunity’ means and John Rawls view point on this subject. Rawls was a well known philosopher from the USA and arguably the most important political philosopher of the 20th century. Rawls is well known for using the basic structure of society as his subject matter and most famously for his work entitled, A Theory of Justice (1971). Here he explains how the “logical ordering of principles of justice can help to structure and regulate an ideal structure society” (John Rawls, 2003) This is not to say that the theory of justice principles can be used to restore justice to society, Rawls simply thinks that basic rights and duties assigned to individuals of society should be equally distributed and that if social and economic advantages were to be evenly distributed to all members of society this would inevitably help regulate and maintain an ideal and fair society.
We will look at what Rawls means by “fair equality of opportunity”, by looking at what he believes is fair, equal and what he means by opportunity.
Discussion:
“Rawls argues that the term 'justice as fairness' does not imply that justice and fairness are identical, but that the principles of justice are agreed to under fair conditions by individuals who are in a situation of equality” (John Rawls, 2003). This statement above by Rawls is stating that if individuals are treated fairly this is when justice is being done and equality prevails. There are two principles outlined by Rawls in ‘justice of fairness’ which are:
First Principle:
Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all.
Second Principle: (a) To the greatest benefit of the least advantaged, ... and (b) Attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of



References: Baker (1987) in Fitzpatrick, T, (2001) Welfare Theory an Introduction, Hampshire: Palgrave. Barry, (1987) in Fitzpatrick, T, (2001) Welfare Theory an Introduction, Hampshire: Palgrave. Callinicos, A, (2000)Equality, Cambridge: Polity Press. Pp 1-65. Drake, R, (2001) The Principles of Social Policy, Hampshire: Palgrave Publishers Ltd. Eltham Labour Party, (2009) Whats the Labour Government ever done for Education, Eltham. London, Available at http://www.elthamlabour.org.uk/whats-the-labour-government-ever-done-for-education [accessed on 9th November 2009] Fitzpatrick, T, (2001) Welfare Theory an Introduction, Hampshire: Palgrave. Lomasky, L, (1987) Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community,Oxford: Oxford University Press. The Labour Party, (2009), Unlocking Britain’s Talent, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Available at http://www.labour.org.uk/further_and_higher_education_and_skills [accessed on 9th November 2009].

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3. True or false? Rawls' view of social justice includes people making choices to protect those who are in a lesser position in society.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equality means treating people in a way that is appropriate for their needs and treating them fairly.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bugmy v The Queen

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    “It is a wise man who said that there is no greater inequality than the equal treatment of unequals.”…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Education, education, education”; Tony Blair identified that these were his key priorities when he came into office in 1997, aiming to raise standards and update the education system to fit a modern and thriving society (BBC News; 2007). This assessment will identify how New Labour’s policies emerged and how the policies they adopted influenced future education. This essay will further analyse any shortcomings in these policies and recommend changes that could have been made to make them more effective.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Notes

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A success shown by Labour during this period was the attempt to break down the old class barriers. ‘It was a very good time for the arts and many aspects of education, the Open University in particular.’ This provides information which supports the idea that the Labour governments of 1964–1970 were a success in creating a new modern Britain. As well as the Open University, Labour’s other education policies included; the development of comprehensive schools and the expansion of higher education.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, because Rawls’ principle encourages business to care for society’s least advantaged, businesses will have a sense of obligation to give back to society. Concrete examples include: donating food to homeless shelters, funding the construction of infrastructures in rural areas, and providing funding for students who can’t afford higher education. Essentially, this principle acts as a reminder as to why businesses should take part in helping…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I also think that Rawls’s theory of justice is a good one. But I doubt if this can be applied in reality. As everyone in our society has his/her own role or position. For example, I am a student, and you are a professor. As a student, I always want to do less work and have good grades; while as a professor, you would like students to study hard. So when come to the decision of what is justice, we will have different opinions. Same as when governor or some authorities define the concept of justice, they will have their own version of justice. As long as we people live in a society, we will have different status, and this will definitely affect our idea of justice and the regulation to govern the society. I also doubt if we really have the original position or how to realize this position. As long as people are conscious, they are always remember or know who they are and what they do and their position in the society, unless they lose their memories. Even the most fair person we believe cannot totally ignore his/her position when…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) What does Rawls mean by "the original position . . . under the veil of ignorance" and how does this serve as the basis for his theory of justice? (2) What are his two principles of justice? Explain the two principles.
(3) Offer a brief critical evaluation of his theory of justice.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the founding fathers began to draft their Declaration of Independence, the idea of equality was at the forefront and they clearly stated how “all men are created equal.” Yet, as the years went on and the nation that was founded by dissenters grew, so did their demographics. The United Sates government today is faced with years of racial, gender and class discrimination, and while they government seeks to protect equality, the nation is not egalitarian. Political theorist John Rawls, in his work, The Law of Peoples, discusses the formal, background and redistributive senses of equality and that the outcome of working with the Law of Peoples in a liberal…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equality is treating everyone in a way that is fairly to them. Not to be confused with treating everybody exactly the same. (e.g. if a person with difficulty walking wanted get to the second floor, you would provide them with other ways, rather than making them take the stairs like everybody else)…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of justice involves fair, just and equal treatment. These facets are found in a person’s personal, moral courage and integrity however fairness and equality can often be limited by prejudice and discrimination. This means that those who fall victim to injustice are not subjects because of their own actions but are rather victims of a system, society or collective action.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays