Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

obedience

Good Essays
1222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
obedience
Obedience
Stanly Milgram and George Orwell present individuals who ignore their own moral codes when they are confronted by authority figures. In Milgram’s experiment people continued to shock other test subjects continuously despite their reservations against it. Even when the participants in Milgram's experiments did not want to continue with the experiment, the authority figure in the experiment was able to convince them to continue. Likewise, in Orwell’s autobiography “Shooting an Elephant”, Orwell shoots an elephant to satisfy the expectations of a crowd of onlookers. However, subjects in Milgram’s experiments were trying to satisfy an authoritative figure; Orwell was trying to maintain his authority amongst the crowd. Human beings are programmed to obey authority figures out of the fear of the consequences that could come if the authority’s wishes are not met.
In the famous Milgram obedience experiment a subject continuously administers electrical shocks to another subject to please an authority figure. In the experiment there is a teacher, learner, and instructor. The teacher is a volunteer who is told to give a series of questions to the learner and if he answers them incorrectly he will be administered an electrical shock that increases in voltage with each wrong answer. The learner is put in a separate room and is not actually electrocuted, but instead is part of the experiment and purposefully gets every answer incorrect and then screams in agony to test the teacher. The instructor is the authority figure in the experiment. If the teacher ever showed any desire to stop the experiment it is the instructor’s job to persuade the teacher to continue to ask the questions and administer the electrical shocks with simple phrases such as “it is essential that you continue the experiment” and “you must continue.” Although a lot of of the test subjects showed great remorse in shocking another person, the instructor was able to make them continue with little effort. Many expressed their concerns for the learner, who was screaming in another room but they continued after the authority figure told them the shocks were harmless and they would not be held responsible if anything were to happen to the learner. The test subjects showed great distress throughout the experiment and were very hesitant in pushing the button again, but more than half continued all the way the highest voltage, 450, and some even continued to press the highest level over and over again when they were told to continue with the experiment. When the learner inside the room stopped screaming at every shock, most of the volunteers continuously insisted on checking him, but the instructor would always tell them they were fine and to continue the experiment, and the teachers reluctantly continued, even while thinking the worst had happened. The presence of the authority figure greatly increased peoples obedience in the experiment along with the fact that the study was being held by Yale made many of the test subjects comply with what the instructor was asking. Also the participants did not know each other and the results may have differed if the selected subjects were friends or foes. In every test people felt morally obligated to check on the learner and halt the experiment but simply continued to satisfy the authority in their presence.
In Orwell’s famous autobiographical essay “Shooting an Elephant,” Orwell is placed in an uncomfortable position when he succumbs to the surrounding authority figures and shoots an elephant. He is a European police officer in Burma and the Burmese people do not like him or any of the Europeans in their country. George expresses his displeasure with his job and wants to leave as soon as he possibly can but before he gets the chance a tame elephant breaks its chains and escapes captivity. Orwell is called to the part of the small town where the elephant has been running rampant, and he finds a man who has been killed by the wild beast. After fetching a rifle, which Orwell says is merely for self-defense, he tracks down the elephant to a rice field where it is peacefully grazing on the grass. After seeing the elephant, which he describes as no more harmful than a cow, he knows that he does not want to kill this misunderstood gentle giant, but as he looks around he sees an enormous crowd watching him. The crowd is expecting him to shoot the calmed elephant. In the town Orwell is the physical authority figure, but in front of the massive crowd full of unsatisfied natives Orwell is the minority with little power. He articulates this in his writing when he says, “Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd—seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind.” Orwell felt the pressure of the crowd pushing him against his own will. In his eyes it was almost a commitment of murder to kill such an enormous creature, but the crowd wanted to see the elephant killed and would consider it cowardly if Orwell backed away. Orwell was pushed against his own will, and to please the growing crowd and maintain his authority amongst the people he aims his rifle and shoots the elephant. Though the elephant did not die instantly, Orwell tried to put the dyeing creature out of his misery but after many unsuccessful attempts he can no longer stand the sight of what he had caused and leaves the beast to die. Orwell obeyed the crowd’s wishes because they would have seen him as a fool if he had not. The pressure of a crowd surrounding you can be immense, and while not shooting the elephant would have lost him and the Europeans even more prestige within Burma, Orwell feared even more of being laughed at by the Burmese people. He states that his life in Burma was “one long struggle not to be laughed at”, he is even afraid of “testing” the animal to see if it is still enraged by walking up to it because he fears being trampled because it would have given the crowd just as much entertainment as killing the elephant. Orwell could have defied the crowd in the rice patties but instead he chose to go against his own beliefs out of fear of being ridiculed even more.
In both situations, the subjects in Milgram’s experiment and George Orwell and his own personal experience, the authority figure was able to manipulate individuals to go against their own ethical beliefs. The instructor in the Milgram experiment convinced people to shock another individual at incredibly painful and possible fatal levels just by telling them that it was okay and to continue the experiment when they expressed their desires to halt the tests. Likewise, Orwell was convinced to kill an elephant by a large crowd of natives even though he saw it as a slaughter because he feared the people of the town making fun of him or thinking he was a fool. Authority figures have a dangerous power over individuals because many will go against everything they stand for in order to not go against the authority’s will because they fear the consequences that could come from it.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that would involve an experimenter, a teacher, and a learner to determine how far obedience would play a role on willing participants. The purpose of Milgram’s experiment is to see how far a willing participant would go based on orders to continue knowing that the orders would result in another person’s pain. The experiment was set up so that two willing participants went into the experiment understanding that they were taking part in a memory and learning exercise. One of the two willing participants played the role as the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Milgram’s article, he explains an experiment he designed to test whether the subjects of the experiment would refuse the orders of authority and follow…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The incident of shooting the elephant gave rise to a much-talked issue. It also created a tremendous negative impact on Orwell’s mind. Even the opinion of his fellow Europeans differed – the older people supported his act, while the younger ones condemned it and argued that ‘it was a damn shame to shoot an elephant for killing a coolie’. However, deep in his mind Orwell always knew that he had shot the elephant ‘solely to avoid looking a…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience and Authority Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram wrote an article, "The Perils of Obedience," which documented his unique experiment about obedience and authority. The purpose was to observe to what extent an ordinary citizen would compromise his or her conscience when ordered to inflict increasing pain to another human. The experiment consisted of three people: a teacher and learner chosen at random, and a scientist. Once all three were acquainted, the scientist explained that the goal of the experiment was to research the effects of discipline. Thereafter, the learner was strapped to a chair with an electrode attached to their wrist.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many reasons as to why people obey which have been justified gradually over several decades.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Orwell, George. “Shooting an Elephant.” The Longman Anthology: British Literature. Third ed. Vol. 2c. N.p.: Pearson Longman, 2006. 2844-848. Print. The Twentieth Century.…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Philip Zimbardo and Stanley Milgram conducted controversial experiments that had to deal with obedience. Zimbardo conducted an experiment in a mock prison that showed the roles of the guards and prisoners. Milgram conducted an experiment that tested how much pain a teacher would inflict on someone else at the command of an experimenter. The experiments that they conducted have been called wrong and unethical. Although the experiments vary from each other, they both changed the way the world looks at obedience and Authority.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was created to show how well people react when obeying the orders of authority. The subjects who ask the questions were the teachers, and the test subjects who had to answer were the learners. If the learner answers the question incorrectly, the teacher will punish them by giving them a shock that was harmful, but not life-threatening. During the experiment, the intensity of the shock increased, which made the learner yell and scream…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Orwell`s character is a unique person that wants to gain a second of attention and for that he gives up something that he thinks that is correct, not shooting an elephant, for a small grade of approval.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Orwell, George. “Shooting an Elephant.” Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays. New York: Penguin Group Inc., 2003. Blackboard. PDF file.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays