Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Nuclear Power

Satisfactory Essays
1014 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Power
Nuclear energy is possibly the best form of electricity generation and has many benefits over other forms of power generation. Nuclear power generation has been has been a controversial topic primarily because of the lack of public knowledge on the topic. Many people do not realize that it is a green from of power generation because it does not produce greenhouse gasses and they also don’t realize the massive energy potential of Nuclear power. Nuclear power is capable of providing more power per Tonne of fuel consumed than any other form of power generation. Spent Nuclear fuel rods have been the concern of many people but once they understand what Nuclear waste really is and how easy it is to safely store or reuse it many people’s opinions regarding Nuclear power generation begin to change once they realize the truth about Nuclear energy.
Nuclear power has been a reliable source of green energy for nearly 60 years and has shown itself to be a practical green alternative when others have proven to be impractical. Nuclear power plants have a lower ecological footprint in comparison to traditional forms of power generation primarily because they do not produce any form of greenhouse gasses during the reaction process and their only emission is water vapor. Nuclear energy’s impact on the environment at the mining end of the process is minimal because of the small amount of Uranium actually being mined and only second to Uranium collected from metals like copper, closed underground mines are the most common source of Uranium which makes up 30% of the total Uranium mined. One argument against Nuclear reactors is that they naturally leak and increase global radioactivity levels. Reactors do leak but it is best to put this kind of information into proper context. Normal operation releases into the environment total up to 0.0002 mSv per year as the global average, but when compared to the natural background radiation which is currently at a global average of 2.4 mSv/a, and can vary anywhere from 1 mSv/a to 13 mSv/a, so 0.0002 mSv is a rather insignificant amount in the grand scheme of things.
Thermo Nuclear power generation has a significant advantage over other forms of power generation because of Uranium’s extremely high energy density allowing for increased production of electricity at a lower cost. The high efficiency of nuclear power reduces the operational costs and the need for a constant feed of resources eliminating the need for massive stock piles or a direct connection to a fuel source. The high efficiency of nuclear power requires less fuel for operation and throughout the world there is only about 54,610 tons of uranium mined2 each year which is only a fraction of the 68 million Tonnes of coal that is mined each year in Canada alone and Canada is only the 14th largest coal producing country. Uranium-235 the most common type of Uranium used in reactors has an energy density of 83 140 000 MJ per Kg vs. Coal which has an energy density of 47 MJ per Kg which gives Nuclear power over 1.7 million times the energy generation capability while consuming the same amount resources. One Kg of Uranium-235 can theoretically produce 80 TJ of energy if complete fission is achieved which is equivalent to approximately 3000 Tonnes of coal.
Spent Nuclear fuel has always been somewhat of a problem and always at the top of the list of public concerns. Nuclear waste has been thought of as the ultimate form of pollution by many people, a type of pollution that never truly goes away but many people do not understand what nuclear waste or radiation really is. People don’t realize that they are being eradiated at all times throughout their entire lives and they are receiving anywhere between 1 mSv/a to 13 mSv/a of background radiation at any given time depending on their location in the world.3 Spent Nuclear fuel is easily stored in dry storage casks and heavy water pools which are located on site at many Nuclear facilities. Once spent fuel rods have spent a minimum of 1 year in a heavy water pool they can be placed in dry cask storage units which can be kept on site without the risk of radiation leaks. Breeder reactors have recently come into the eyes of the nuclear community because they have the capability to reuse spent fuel from conventional reactors. Reused fuel in breeder reactors will be able to produce 100 times more energy than conventional light water reactors.9 Breeder reactors combined with seawater Uranium extraction will be able to supply power at the current rates for about 5 billion years making Nuclear as sustainable as wind or solar energy. Reusing fuel in breeder reactors reduces the half-life of the depleted uranium to about 300 years by removing actinides this will allow for a more rapid turnover of nuclear waste and there will be no longer any need for permanent storage of waste materials virtually eliminating nuclear energy’s main problem.
Nuclear power generation is by far the best form of power generation and with proper public education on the subject it would most likely become the main source of power around the world. Power generation has been producing power for nearly 60 years without any operational emissions proving its reliability and effectiveness as a green energy source. There is no other source of power generation that can produce a comparable amount of electricity or reach the high levels of resource efficiency Nuclear power has achieved while still being a green energy source. Nuclear waste has been most people’s red flag when talking about Nuclear energy but with advanced Breeder reactors that waste can be reused and reduced with a significantly shorted half-life. Nuclear energy has been the unrecognized green energy source with massive untapped potential and with current and future advancements in efficiency, and safety people may realize the true potential of nuclear to meet the worlds demand for reliable clean energy.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear energy is one of the hottest topics in the fight to a cleaner world. The number of people who believe that nuclear energy is too dangerous and unhealthy for the earth has skyrocketed because of the nuclear accidents that have happened in the past and recently. These protesters may have a lot of evidence and theories about how bad this type of energy can be, but the people who have realized that nuclear energy is the way to a cleaner and more “Green” society have proof and facts that overrule anything that the protesters say.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power is reliable yet controversial source of energy in the U.S. Many people have different viewpoints on Nuclear energy. Although nuclear energy can cause many problems such as nuclear accidents, it saves money, produces less pollution, and it can be made in any environment. The benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the risks. Without nuclear energy we would be relying on the weather for energy.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the last century, nuclear power has been established as a reliable source of energy in the major industrialized countries. Nuclear power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity. In the United States, nuclear power supplies about 15 percent of the electricity overall. Although no new plants are scheduled to be built in the United States, nuclear power is growing to be a popular producer of power. It has recently enjoyed a revival in attention and research due to the environmental concerns surrounding current conventional energy sources. Issues of regulation and safety are at the forefront of all discussions involving nuclear power. (Lillington) One of the major concerns is the radioactive waste that is produced during the fission of uranium.…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an era of untold gasoline prices and frequent political dialogue about finding and using alternative forms of energy. Some of these alternative energy sources that are being bantered about and, in some places, implemented include solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The majority of Americans would agree that all of these forms of alternative energy are safe and should be pursued as new means of powering the country. However, there is one well-known energy source that stirs up dissent and division among the country’s citizens: nuclear power.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a commodity like electricity becomes easily accessible, how it operates can be overlooked. We don’t have to know how it works as long as it works. Nuclear energy powers twenty percent of world energy needs, but is it really worth it? Is the energy worth it for disasters like Chernobyl or Fukushima? I believe that it’s not. Nuclear energy should not be utilized due to issues like radioactive water and radioactive waste.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics