A Comparison of Nuclear Energy and Coal Energy
Which is Better Nuclear Energy or Coal? 1
As opposed to an either/or approach, use your thesis statement (place it as the last sentence of the introduction) to clearly select either nuclear or coal and then use the arguments in your paper to support that position.
The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.
Even though coal provides carbon dioxide for what trees need. Don’t 9 think of coal as a solid black rock? Think of it as a mass of atoms. Restate to remove the reader. Most of the atoms are carbon. A few are hydrogen. And 8there are some others, like sulfur and nitrogen, mixed in 8 ends in a preposition 1 cite. Chemists can take this mass of atoms, break. It apart, and make new substances, like gas! Isn’t gas just a different state? Sulfur that comes out of the coal construction helps the earth. How? Nuclear energy doesn't 9 provide anything. Back in the day of maybe 1820 8 be specific people started using water as power 8 Relevance? America has more coal than any other fossil fuel resource 1. The United States also has more coal reserves than any other single country in
As opposed to an either/or approach, use your thesis statement (place it as the last sentence of the introduction) to clearly select either nuclear or coal and then use the arguments in your paper to support that position.
The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.
Even though coal provides carbon dioxide for what trees need. Don’t 9 think of coal as a solid black rock? Think of it as a mass of atoms. Restate to remove the reader. Most of the atoms are carbon. A few are hydrogen. And 8there are some others, like sulfur and nitrogen, mixed in 8 ends in a preposition 1 cite. Chemists can take this mass of atoms, break. It apart, and make new substances, like gas! Isn’t gas just a different state? Sulfur that comes out of the coal construction helps the earth. How? Nuclear energy doesn't 9 provide anything. Back in the day of maybe 1820 8 be specific people started using water as power 8 Relevance? America has more coal than any other fossil fuel resource 1. The United States also has more coal reserves than any other single country in