Preview

Nuclear Energy - High Costs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
14024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Energy - High Costs
VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2

January 2008

AN IEER PUBLICATION

Published on the Web as Énergie et Sécurité and

No. 40

Nuclear Power Costs: High and Higher

A
BY

ARJUN

MAKHIJANI,

Ph.D.

1

fter the spectacular crash of the 1950s propaganda of nuclear power that would be “too cheap to meter,” evidenced in dozens of cancelled nuclear power plants because they were too costly to build or complete, there is a new push for nuclear power in the United States. Some advocates of a nuclear power “renaissance” are basing their appeals on the notion that nuclear power will be an inexpensive way to get new baseload capacity and to combat global warming. Others believe that it may become economical if there is a high enough price on carbon dioxide emissions.

Cost estimates of nuclear power
The principal cost associated with commercial nuclear power is the capital cost of the plant. Operating costs consist of fuel, which is generally low enriched uranium; other operating and maintenance costs constitute a relatively small fraction of the total cost of nuclear power. The costs of spent fuel management and disposal as well as decommissioning costs would be in addition to these two items. Capital costs of nuclear power consist mainly of two components: • The “overnight cost” of the power plant – this is the cost that would be incurred if the plant could be built at once. • Additional costs incurred during construction, notably interest costs. The overnight cost of nuclear power is a matter of some debate. A 2003 MIT report, which advocates building nuclear power plants, estimated it at $2,000 per

kilowatt (kW), while a 2004 University of Chicago study estimated it at $1,500 per kW.1 Current U.S. estimates and actual experience in Western Europe with the European Pressurized Water Reactor are much higher. For instance, the CEO of Duke Energy, which wants to build nuclear power plants, gave his estimate of the capital cost of $2,500 to $2,600 per kW.2 Using



References: 1 he nuclear industry has been quick to proclaim that a “nuclear renaissance” is occurring, or is at least in the offing, though not a single new reactor has been ordered at the time of this writing (midNovember 2007)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Todd H. Otis, A Review Of Nuclear Energy in the United States: Hidden Power, (New York, NY: Praeger Publishers,…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global nuclear power plants and its industry have been a high expense for government subsidies,tax credit, or any form of public support in favor of the industry. A half century later, we have noticed that nuclear power is, instead, too expensive to finance. The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction. In addition , huge cost overruns are discovered which were passed on to utility customers…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans have always tried to find innovative, powerful and valid energy sources in order to be able to supply the several needs of modern societies. In this sense, nuclear power is considered one of the most controversial technologies related to the new millennium.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently the spotlight has been set on renewable energies to assist with weaning off of greenhouse gas emissions, solving issues with energy independence, and to exploit their inherent renewability. Unfortunately our technology is not quite up to speed economically with our wish to rely completely on renewable energy, thus many non-renewable energies are recognized as viable options to power our economy (Fraser, 2011). The United States’ current position on diversifying with non-renewables consists of oil, natural gas, coal, and the less spoken of, nuclear power. Nuclear power is the process by which a reactor contains a slow explosion called fission, which gives off a positive net amount of energy that can be harvested. Of course the social stigma around nuclear is so strong that even if there were an undiscovered completely safe type of nuclear power plant, justifying the complex science would be challenging. After events such as Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island, the vast majority of society believes nuclear energy is nothing more than a death wish. Contrary to popular belief, a safer alternative in nuclear energy has been discovered and has been gaining popularity over the past few years despite the recent tragedy in Japan (Sorensen, 2011). Though newly rekindled, the non-mainstream nuclear power known as Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) was discovered in the 1960’s and had been proved to be a very attractive option to the more popular Light Water Reactor (LWR). It all began with nuclear physicist Alvin Weinberg, who would graduate from the University of Chicago soon become research director at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Weinberg was given the freedom to experiment with designing multiple types of nuclear reactors including the prominent LWR’s that are in commercial use today. Subsequently Weinberg had noted the potential danger of a LWR and moved on to designing a safer…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Energy Policy

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages

    Nuclear energy issues facing Congress include federal incentives for new commercial reactors, radioactive waste management policy, research and development priorities, power plant safety and regulation, nuclear weapons proliferation, and security against terrorist attacks. Significant incentives for new commercial reactors were included in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05, P.L. 109-58). These include production tax credits, loan guarantees, insurance against regulatory delays, and extension of the Price-Anderson Act nuclear liability system. Together with higher fossil fuel prices and the possibility of greenhouse gas controls, the federal incentives for nuclear power have helped spur renewed interest by utilities and other potential reactor developers. Plans for as many as 31 reactor license applications have been announced, although it is unclear how many of those projects will move forward. In his January 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama called for “building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants” as a key component of his “clean energy” program. Financing for new reactors is widely considered to depend on the loan guarantees authorized by EPACT05 Title XVII, administered by the Department of Energy (DOE). The total amount of loan guarantees to be provided to nuclear power projects has been a continuing congressional issue. Nuclear power plants are currently allocated $18.5 billion in loan guarantees, enough for three or four reactors. President Obama’s FY2011 budget request would nearly triple the loan guarantee ceiling for nuclear power plants, to $54.5 billion. However, opponents of nuclear power contend that the Administration’s proposed increases in nuclear loan guarantees…

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The meltdown of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant on March 11th 2011 has directly aroused the controversy on nuclear power worldwide. Germany's coalition government finally announced a reversal of policy that would see all the country's nuclear power plants phased out by 2022. Due to the safety concern on nuclear power, a great multitude of economists in the United States believe that the economic market of nuclear power will be severely restrained in the future. On the other hand, nuclear power, as a significant emission-free resource inside the US, provides approximately 20 percent of the nation’s total electricity energy generation. An important question that can be asked is: whether economics of nuclear power will be affected by the recent nuclear accident and the public anxiety that rebounded from it. A research paper, entitled “Prospects for U.S. Nuclear Power After Fukushima” by Lucas W. Davis in 2011, attempts to break down the question and provide detailed analysis on this issue with collected data and professional knowledge. In particular, Davis’s research focuses on the costs during nuclear power generation and its competitive advantages in long run. On a broader spectrum, the writer considers both benefits and risks nuclear power brings to human life, and finally comes to a conclusion.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the last century, nuclear power has been established as a reliable source of energy in the major industrialized countries. Nuclear power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity. In the United States, nuclear power supplies about 15 percent of the electricity overall. Although no new plants are scheduled to be built in the United States, nuclear power is growing to be a popular producer of power. It has recently enjoyed a revival in attention and research due to the environmental concerns surrounding current conventional energy sources. Issues of regulation and safety are at the forefront of all discussions involving nuclear power. (Lillington) One of the major concerns is the radioactive waste that is produced during the fission of uranium.…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has been argued that renewable energy is considered, as it can be a replacement for fossil fuel and developing renewable energy cost less money. A research from Hearps and McConnell (2011) indicates that even though the cost of the development of renewable energy is more on C02 reduction but it significantly will reduce the cost of mitigating climate change in the future. In Australia, Another research conducted by Australia Academy of Science (2009) indicates that develops renewable energy, for instance wind turbines, solar thermal, geothermal and other energies can help Australia in minimizing investment cost because the lower installation cost of the technologies and maximizing the energy production particularly as the primary future electricity option. On the other hand, some others believed (Greenpeace, 2009; ACS, 2009) that the development of nuclear power is often known as the most expensive sources to build compare to renewable energy development. In fact, even the nuclear industry has estimated the cost to build nuclear reactor precisely, the final cost result three times higher than the plan and it tend to be unpredictable (Greenpeace, 2009). For example, India that has experienced in constructing nuclear reactor faced to 300 % over budget and the same problem happened in Finland that faced to 1,5 billion over budget when construct new nuclear reactor (Greenpeace, 2009).…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As non-renewable sources are falling deficient, people turn to alternatives instead, including wind energy, solar energy,... Another energy industry has also developed when scientists find the way to bombard the atom to release the energy stored inside, which is called nuclear energy. The great finding of this alternative source has turned a new leaf on human life. Despite its amazing benefits, nuclear energy has posed as a threat, [negatively] affect us by many ways…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Reactors in the past few years have created a problem and moreover, they are confronted with issues relating to disposal of nuclear waste, catastrophic accidents despite the development of newer reactor designs and economics of nuclear power. After two or more decades there is a need for a revival of nuclear power. This is mainly due to climate change, desire for energy security and volatility in the fossil fuel market.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics