# Nike Case Study Executive Summary

Satisfactory Essays
393 Words
Grammar
Plagiarism
Writing
Score
Nike Case Study Executive Summary
Nike Executive Summary

Kimi Ford manages a large mutual fund for NorthPoint Group. Her company is trying to decide whether or not to invest in Nike’s stock, which has been declining in price in the past year. Kimi has asked her assistant, Joanna Cohen, to estimate Nike’s weight average cost of capital (WACC) to help make this decision (Case 13, pg. 58). We looked at Joanna’s estimates and discovered a few problems that she made when estimating her cost of capital. We found Joanna’s estimates to be wrong because of a few reasons. The first mistake she made was using the average beta instead of the most recent beta provided. She was using average of Nike’s beta from 1996 to the present, which was .80 (Case 13, pg. 59). We used the beta of .69, which was the most recent beta provided to us. The second mistake we found was that she used the book value of debt instead of the market value of debt. The book value was \$441.30 and the market value was \$421.88 so she overstated debt by \$19.42 (Exhibit 6). To find Nike’s cost of debt, we used three different methods: the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) (Exhibit 7), the Dividend Discount Model (DDM) (Exhibit 5), and the Earnings Capitalization Model (ECM) (Exhibit 8). We decided that the CAPM gave us the most accurate estimate of Nike’s cost of debt, and we used that in arriving at our before-tax cost of debt of 7.173% and our final after-tax cost of debt of 4.447% (Exhibit 6). To find our WACC, we used the market value of equity and debt to determine our weights of equity and debt. Our weight of equity is 89.947% and our weight of debt is 10.053%. Using the above numbers, we calculated a WACC of 7.338% (Exhibit 9). After discounting Nike’s cash flows using the WACC value we calculated, we believe that Nike is undervalued by \$2.51 per share of stock. Also, Nike’s terminal value of cash flows is greater than the equity value of the firm. (Exhibit 3). We think that they should invest because the price of Nike’s

## You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

• Good Essays

In this case, the corporate cost of capital needs to be analyzed and hence, to estimate that, a company’s long-term source of funds (common stock, long-term debts and preferred stock) should be used. Since the corporate cost of capital is used to make decisions today, which will affect the future cash flows, the only acceptable costs are today’s marginal costs that are used. These marginal values are the estimates of the cost of capital that will be raised in future which will provide an accurate estimation of raising the capital in future.…

• 1073 Words
• 4 Pages
Good Essays
• Good Essays

Mercury Athletic on the other hand appears to be a rising star within the industry. With revenue growth of 20.16% in 2006 alone, the company has clearly been expanding its market share in the industry. The last year also saw increases across all company profit margins, though these margins are lower than Athletic Gear’s. After taking a hit in 2005, RNOA and ROE have somewhat bounced back and the company’s ROE is…

• 692 Words
• 3 Pages
Good Essays
• Satisfactory Essays

Wrigley’s prerecapitalization WACC is 10.9%. The cost of equity assumes a risk-free rate of 5.65% for 20-year U.S. Treasuries (case Exhibit 7), a risk premium is assumed 7% (or 5%), and uses Wrigley’s current beta of 0.75 (case Exhibit 5).…

• 664 Words
• 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays
• Good Essays

Jide Wintoki From: Richard Smith, Scott Mitchell, Zack Gregory Re: Mercury Athletic Acquisition Based on our analysis of Mr. Liedtke’s base case projections for a potential acquisition of Mercury Athletic, we have concluded that this is a positive net present value project, and that AGI should proceed with the acquisition. Under Mr. Liedtke’s operating assumptions, we calculate the value of Mercury’s discounted cash flows to be \$624.446 million, and the acquisition price to be \$156.643 million, yielding a net present value of \$467,804 for AGI. Our calculations indicate that this project becomes even more attractive financially when potential favorable synergies between AGI and Mercury are taken into account. A real options valuation (details below) involving inventory management and the women’s casual line indicates that an additional \$22.365 million of value would be created by the successful implementation of fairly simple operating synergies in those two areas alone. Considering that far more possible synergies and savings are a possibility for AGI and Mercury post-acquisition, we believe this acquisition would be an appropriate strategic move for AGI to improve its own performance and to compete on a more level playing field with the larger companies in the industry. Methodology/Supporting Assumptions To estimate the price of acquiring Mercury, we averaged the P/E multiples of comparable companies in the industry and applied that multiple to Mercury’s 2006 net income to arrive at a likely purchase price. P/E was used because we believe it is the most accurate reflection of the market’s view of Mercury’s recent performance and value. Kinsley Coulter and Templeton Athletic were used as the two comparable companies because, along with AGI and Mercury, they are the only other companies in the industry with annual revenue of less than \$1 billion (Marina Wilderness also has revenue less than \$1 billion, but because it is the fastest- growing company in the industry…

• 691 Words
• 3 Pages
Good Essays
• Good Essays

John Liedtke head of Active Gear, Inc. (AGI) is contemplating whether to invest in Mercury Athletic a subsidiary of West Coast Fashions (WCF). Mercury was purchased by WCF in hopes to increase business revenue however this was not the case. Business did not do as expected, WCF was then eager to abandon its apparel. John Liedtke saw this as an opportunity to take over Mercury and as result increase its business revenue. In order to determine whether this is an essential business opportunity John needs to complete preliminary financial valuations to make a solid decision.…

• 767 Words
• 4 Pages
Good Essays
• Good Essays

From their shoes to their professional athlete contracts with huge stars like Kevin Durant and LeBron James and even just their symbol, Nike is a household name. Its extremely hard to go anywhere without seeing a pair of their shoes, their symbol on a piece of some ones clothing, or even spotting one of their backpacks. But does that mean they would be a good investment? This paper aims to analyze the financial situations of Nike and one of its lead competitors, Under Armour, and help decide whether they have investment potential.…

• 533 Words
• 3 Pages
Good Essays
• Satisfactory Essays

The cost equity estimated using the CAPM approach, Surfside Footwear was selected as a comparable company since its EBIT Margin of 9.3% was the same as the average consolidated EBIT Margin of Mercury Athletic for period 2004-2006, the Equity Beta for Surfside from Exhibit 3 was 2.13. The risk free was determined to be 4.69% using US Treasury Bills Yield given in the case Footnotes on page 7. The 5 year T-bill yield was selected…

• 336 Words
• 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays
• Powerful Essays

The purpose of this paper is to provide investors with comprehensive information on Nike, its financial health and activities, its strength and weaknesses, and whether Nike creates value to its shareholders. This paper will analyze Nike's capital structure, scope of international operations, recent stock performance, and dividend policy. We will examine how Nike's international operations are conducted, its criticisms and strengths. Nike's debt ratios, dividend payout ratios, dividend yield, and interest coverage ratios over the previous 5 years will be discussed and compared with industry benchmarks. Its bond ratings and the relation between the operating characteristics and its leverage will also be analyzed.…

• 2483 Words
• 10 Pages
Powerful Essays
• Good Essays

1. What is the WACC and why is it important to estimate a firm’s cost of capital?…

• 1187 Words
• 5 Pages
Good Essays
• Good Essays

At the analysts’ meeting Nike unveiled plans to remedy both the revenue growth, or lack of, and the operating performance. The company planned to grow revenues through the development of more mid-priced athletic shoe products, and by putting more emphasis on their apparel line. Nike also stated that they would be more focused on controlling their expenses. In addition to this, Nike’s executives reaffirmed their long-term revenue-growth targets of 8% to 10% and earnings growth targets of more than 15%.…

• 1154 Words
• 5 Pages
Good Essays
• Satisfactory Essays

We decided to use the 20 year treasury risk free rate value of 5.74% because it is a conservative value for such a period of time; and having covered such a span of time compensates for volatility. The average beta (β) of Nike firm from 1996-date which is 0.80 appears to be the best for such an analysis, so we adopt it as well.…

• 742 Words
• 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays
• Better Essays

Joanna Cohen made a few mistakes as she conducted her analysis for the cost of capital for Nike. The first mistake that Ms. Cohen made was that she used book values instead of the market values when computing the weights for the WACC. The second mistake that she made was that she calculated the cost of debt using historical values. We calculated the yield in maturity of the debt as the bond doesn’t mature until the year 2021 but instead of using book values for equity we calculated the market value of equity as well. The third mistake that was made was Ms. Cohen’s method in choosing the beta. She used the average beta, which is not the most precise beta considering the fact that Nike has been relatively volatile in the financial markets in recent years. The fourth mistake that Ms. Cohen made in deciding what market risk premium to use, she only chose one…

• 1258 Words
• 6 Pages
Better Essays
• Powerful Essays

This paper is a case study of Nike Inc. I will give a brief overview of the history, products, company goals, company challenges, financial report and sourcing strategies. My main sources of information are internet databases, company annual reports, and financial articles.…

• 1486 Words
• 6 Pages
Powerful Essays
• Powerful Essays

In the fiscal year 2006 Nike Inc. and its five wholly-owned subsidiaries (Cole Haan, Converse, Exeter Brands Group, Hurley, Nike Bauer Hockey, and Nike Golf) brought in just short of fifteen billion in revenue, its highest figure ever. The net income for the same year registered at approximately fourteen hundred million dollars. Earnings per share also came in at its all time high rate and growing some eighteen percentages from 2005. (Nike 10-K form, 2006, p.46)…

• 2441 Words
• 10 Pages
Powerful Essays
• Better Essays

Cohen’s book value of equity is the total shareholder’s equity in the balance sheet, \$3494.5. The market value of equity on the other hand, is \$11427; computed using stock price X number of shares outstanding (\$42.09*271.5 million shares), which is also commonly exercised computing market capitalization of a company in an industry. The book value of equity used by Cohen is very different from the market value of equity. Therefore the weight of debt and equity also differ greatly. Cohen found that Nike is financed by 27% on debt and 73% on equity, but using the market value to better reflect Nike’s debt and equity, I found that Nike is financed by 10.19% on debt and 89.81% on equity. The differences are bigger than it looks, as we are talking about millions of dollars being calculated inaccurately, so it is important for portfolio managers like Kimi Ford to carefully assess the assumptions that are needed to calculate the cost of capital of Nike.…

• 1183 Words
• 5 Pages
Better Essays