Preview

Newell Corporate Strategy Case Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Newell Corporate Strategy Case Analysis
How can you tell if your company is really more than the sum of its parts? To create viable corporate strategy you can´t act independently within the different internal factors of the company company. Even if you work well at the company core competencies, or even if you do a great job restructuring its corporate portfolios or building learning organizations you might not succeed. In that case you would be only focusing on individual elements of corporate strategy: resources, businesses, or organization rather than turning those elements into an integrated whole. That insight is the essence of corporate advantage – the way a company creates value through the configuration and coordination of its multibusiness activities. Ultimately, it is what …show more content…
Newell deliberately moves managers across business units and from the business to the corporate level. It enables to transfer experience and the benefits of its transfers can be fully realized because of the commonalities across its businesses. They only activity shared is its advanced data-management system that is completely central and common to the whole Newell´s strategy. Determine the measures and rewards play an important role because when conducting an appropriate control system the corporate center can have the right perception to determine strategic decisions and influence performance in the individual businesses. 1. Corporate strategy is guided by a vision of how a firm, as a whole, will create value. 2. Corporate Strategy is a system of interdependent parts and it depends essencially on how the different elements reinforce each others. 3. Corporate Strategy must invests and capitalize on opportunities outside the company 4. The benefits of corporate membership must be greater than the costs. Sharp Sharp is characterized by being a corporation with a consistent vision of technological creativity which has pushed it to the forefront of its industry. Sharp´s valuable resources are a set of specialized optoelectronics technologies that contributes to the competitive advantage of the company´s core businesses. They have the amazing capability to multiply themselves across multiple products creating competitive advantage in those businesses based on its core technologies. Sharp´s basic structure is based on the fact that the research and manufacturing components occur in a single unit where scale economies can be exploited but which requires a need and a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In assessing Newell Company’s corporate-level strategy and whether the company adds value to the businesses within its portfolio, it is necessary to identify its overarching strategy and then explain it with context to how it affects the various businesses within the larger corporate body.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Strategy is broken into 4 sections; financial, customer, internal business process, and learning & growth. The map has an upward flow, leading to financial success. Starting with customer support and the in-store experience. These both effect the internal business processes. Making Lowe’s differentiated from its rival Home Depot. These also help bring in more joint successful joint ventures & acquisitions. This drive the loyalty and trust of the customers. They will trust Lowe’s more as they start to become distinguished from there rival. This all leads to generated cash flows and a better return the to shareholders.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Q1. Newell is a company with a successful corporate-level strategy of using horizontal integration through acquiring companies that fit its criteria for acquisition in order to achieve synergy through economies of scope. Such companies manufacture hardware and do-it-yourself products that are low-technology, non-seasonal, non-cyclical and non-fashionable to volume merchandisers. They compete on cost rather than on production differentiation and targets the same type of customers (large mass retailer) and thus exhibit many similarities with Newell. As such, potential synergies can be achieved through Newell’s acquisition. Important to Newell’s success in corporate-level strategy is its core competence which is its ability to provide a high service level to the mass retailers. Crucial this is its organization capability and resources. Newell has previously invested in computer and communication hardware which is a valuable, rare, costly to imitate and organized to capture value. It is a valuable resource that is organized to capture value as it seeks to provide Newell’s customers with what they want, namely reliable delivery that allows the mass retailers to maximise sales yet minimise holding costs while also reducing claims from retailers on unfilled orders. Such a resource is also rare and hard to imitate for Newell’s rivals due to the relatively high cost of such investment for smaller manufacturers. However, for Newell, having started investment early and having many different divisions, this cost is justifiable due to having economics of scope for their ability to streamline data from retailers through its Electronic Data Interchange (EDI). This works by streamlining data management to serve Newell’s many different divisions and allow all divisions within to…

    • 1441 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Newell Corporate Strategy

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Does Newell have a successful corporate-level strategy? Does the company add value to the businesses within its portfolio?…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Newell's Strategy Summary

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1- Newell has a strategy at the organizational level that the company implements by the end of the1990s. The strategy is seen in its endeavors to expand. The expansion is achieved through acquisitions meant to reach more customers or increase the market share, expand the product portfolio, and increase revenue. The company acquires Rubbermaid and Calphalon in its quest to expand and have a global presence. McDonough believes that a big company can get more attention than a smaller company can. Similarly, a bigger brand can command or dictate the prices in the market. The company’s strategy also centers upon achieving profitability and operational efficiency.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Newell’s businesses target the mass retail market, mostly in the discount segment, by distributing mostly off-the-shelf goods through mass-retail channels, transforming shelf space and on-time delivery into a very powerful value proposition. Since the efficient use of these vital resources is a pillar for the success of Newell, it can be deemed its competitive advantage. Newell’s corporate strategy is to grow through acquisitions, by leveraging synergies in the aforementioned resources rather than in product offerings. The critical resources that are shared throughout Newell’s firms are its managers. This allows for best practices to be disseminated among its newly acquired firms without undermining the business units’ autonomy. In terms of sharing resources, Newell has centralized key administrative functions through a unified data-management system, which allows it to orchestrate its businesses’ activities more efficiently. Newell’s organizational configuration has enabled these key resources work to its advantage, thus achieving coordination. The control systems at Newell are balanced between the financial and operational methods. This allows the firm to regulate performance in terms of both internal and external factors that influence the business. There is a set of multiple operating variables and financial measures that are reviewed monthly, with a healthy bonus for managers that meet related goals. By having its measurement and rewards systems fit with its business goals, Newell’s has ensured that strategic control is established through the proper leveraging of its management team’s experience. According to the “Triangle of Corporate Strategy,” with all three strategic factors present among its resources, organization and business (competitive advantage, strategic control and coordination), Newell has successfully created a corporate advantage that is guided by a value adding vision, which strives to make the value of the firm larger than the sum of all its…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agreed with my teammates discussions of the CEOs of the companies. We discussed four CEOs: Neville Isdell, Coca-Cola CEO, Gary Kelly, Southwest Airline CEO, Mackey McDonald, VF Corporation CEO, and Anne Mulcahy, Xerox CEO. The corporate strategy that was used by Neville Isdell is growth and the planning function used is diversification. This is due to the fact that he is seeking to branch out by selling non-carbonated beverages. Such as Coca-Cola Black, a coffee and buying all or part of vitamin water from Glasso. The corporate strategies used by Gary Kelly are growth and stability, and planning function of management is concentration. The reason for this is locking up the hedge fund contracts, and keeping cost down. Continuing to fly the same planes (737) so that parts and maintenance are easy is a great strategy. He also promotes treating customers like kings and queens, and employees even better! The corporate strategy used by Mackey McDonald is growth and the planning function is vertical integration and concentration. This is because of the focus on their lifestyle brands, such as Vans and Reef. They avoid getting involved in the high risk fashion brands & stayed with the commodity brands. Concentrate more on what the consumer would use every day. The corporate strategy used by Anne Mulcahy is renewal and the planning function is concentration. She took over when Xerox was on the brink of bankruptcy. She had to cut…

    • 697 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Loblaws Business Strategy

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Looking at the above factors, there are many opportunities for Canadian grocers to improve on their services such as vertical integration as supplier/distributor, innovative technologies like RFID, and global expansion (See SWOT Analysis – Appendix B).…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sonic is the largest drive-in chain in the United States. Under the slogan "America's Drive-In," a Sonic features fast service by roller-skating carhops and unique menu items that cannot be found at McDonald‘s, Burger King, or Wendy‘s. Sonic restaurants operate in 27 states so it is smaller than leading fast food chains however it is still a significant competitor. Founded by Troy Smith and Charlie Pappe in 1953, Sonic went from a single root beer stand to a popular franchise. In 1973, Sonic restructured as a franchise company and later became Sonic Corporation. The company experienced financial decline due to the lack of consistency from its franchisees so they were bought out by Sonic Corporation and restructured. In 1995, Sonic introduced "Sonic 2000," an aggressive multi-layered strategy to further unify the company in terms of a consistent menu, brand identity, products, packaging, and service. The campaign was successful and Sonic's brand recognition increased. Strengths include a strong competitive nature, flexible strategies, and employee/franchisor relationships. Weaknesses include lack of communication and domestic expansion. Threats in the external environment include company size, employee turnover, weak economy, rivals in similar industries, overseas expansion, and slow growth markets. Sonic can overcome these threats with opportunities such as global expansion, increase in the number of quick service consumers, and appealing investment opportunities. Alternative strategies and recommendations suggest that Sonic should concentrate on a low cost strategy and focusing on niches such as the health food market.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. faces a plethora of problems in just the past five years including a barrage of public criticisms calling for a change in the management strategies of Wal-Mart. The underlying problem or fundamental issue is the cost-based competition that Wal-Mart intensified through its obsession for cost minimization. In a way, Wal-Mart commenced and intensified price wars. Wal-Mart achieved sales less than its target so that it cut back prices during the holiday season and other occasions on various items including back to school products. By decreasing its price, Wal-Mart intended to draw more customers to make more purchases and enable the company to achieve its targeted sales (Thompson, Strickland & Gamble, 2007). The decline in sales was due to the saturation of the market as well intensifying competition resulting to demolition campaigns against Wal-Mart.…

    • 2277 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Procter & Gamble’s business strategy? What is the relationship of collaboration and innovation to that business strategy?…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Every industry and every company operates within a unique internal and external environment. Because of this there is never one specific strategy that dominates others, even within industries. Determining which strategic direction to take in order to meet goals and achieve a company’s vision is not easy or uniform. For this reason, simply reading about business strategy from a textbook doesn’t give the reader a true sense of real life decisions companies face, or the intuition and results of those decisions. By looking at case studies the reader can gain much greater insight into the inner workings of competitive industries and the way companies and managers actually do things, while at the same time, building his or her analytical skills (Raymond, 1999). In this Case Analysis, I will examine Nintendo’s strategy with focus on the introduction of the Nintendo Wii gaming console.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company urges invest in something new to achieve advantage to develop their business. However with technology improving and market becoming mutual the “pie” seems not big enough for such increasing amount of investors. Many fail to gain economies of scale. Moreover, in the current market company is in the competition also turns to be fiercer. An excessive investment to unrelated and “hot” may compel company neglect their existing business developments which result in competitive advantage lose. Porter (1985) insisted that company who abandoned its core business prematurely, searching for new opportunities that only erode their core. Data from 185 companies in 33 industries shoe that market leaders earned a 25.4% return on capital, compared with 14.3% for companies in a weaker market position (Zook 2001). It is the time for company to make more affect on sustaining their competitive advantage. A prudent competitive strategy should be chosen to support this.…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Creating Corporate Strategy

    • 7369 Words
    • 30 Pages

    What has slipped under the radar are those companies-the majority, we would argue-that don't destroy value at the corporate level, but neither do they create it. That failure is not for lack of trying. Indeed, in many of the 50 companies we studied during a sixyear research project, corporate executives were struggling to create viable corporate strategies. Some were working on their core competencies, others were restructuring their corporate portfolios, and still others were building learning organizations. In each case, executives were focusing on individual elements of corporate strategy: resources, businesses, or organization. What was missing was the insight that turns those elements into an integrated whole. That insight is the essence of corporate advantage - the way a company creates value through the configuration and coordination of its multibusincss activities. Ultimately, it is Vk^hat differentiates truly great corporate strategies from the merely adequate.…

    • 7369 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Generic

    • 1591 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A firm positions itself by leveraging its strengths. Michael Porter has argues that a firm’s strengths ultimately fall into one of two headings: cost advantage and differentiation which are applied at the business unit level. The two basic types of competitive advantage combined with the scope of activities for which a firm seeks to achieve them, lead to three generic strategies for achieving above average performance in an industry: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays