Preview

Monstrosity In Frankenstein

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monstrosity In Frankenstein
Towards the beginning of the twentieth century, ‘monstrosity’ underwent a significant shift; from externalised representations to largely internal manifestations. From the Victorian vilification of the social and cultural ‘Other’ as an antithesis to morality and human civilisation, the monster grew to embody a more relativistic and ambiguous identity in the twentieth century paradigm. American Psycho’s Patrick Bateman, and Monster’s Aileen ‘Lee’ Wuronos, are two quintessential monsters of the ‘serial-killer-as-protagonist’ trend that proliferated in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. In these eras, the binary opposites of ‘human’ and ‘monster’ became almost synonymous due to the ostensible absence of moral absolutes.

Composed in a
…show more content…
In such passages, Ellis effectively parodies the superfluity of consumer culture, and its mindless ethic of disposal and repurchase. The absurdity of investing ‘two hundred dollars’ in a ‘shoe-horn’ aptly encapsulates Patrick’s myopic zeal to fashion his self-worth and dignity by attaching material value to every conceivable aspect of the quotidian. To do without extravagance is to fail in projecting that imperious image of perfection, and this imperative to abide by that implacable rule is what sustains Bateman’s …show more content…
After insisting that she will pay for their meal with her “Platinum American Express Card”, Patrick senses “violent convulsions at hand”, which prompts “a sadistic, acidic, gastric reaction.” In a horrific murder scene later in the chapter, Patrick violently reasserts the supremacy he has lost by “shooting nails into her hands” and “with scissors, cut[ting] out her tongue”, at last, silencing the unbearable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Victor Frankenstein and the Creature appear to be completely different people. But their personalities it stands out that they are a mirror image of each other. The creature and Victor both share a strong love of knowledge but they can’t control their obsession with it so it often results in tragedy. Victor became obsessed with the science and creation of life. The Creature on the other hand became obsessed with humans. The creature observed a poor family that lived in a cottage and became obsessed with learning about them. The creature approaches the family trying to make friends and gets ran off for his looks and he learns that humans are quick to judge. The creature begins to grow a hate for humans because he realizes that he will never…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The desire for companionship grows so intensely within the non-human subspecies that the monster asks Victor Frankenstein for an outlandish favor: a female counterpart. Through a lover, the monster can display his inner love with a being that does not judge him. At the time when the monster acts for a love, he has yet to found any acceptance in the human society. Thus, a monster counterpart would provide the only outlet of affection for the monster. The monster’s wish for a partner exemplifies that the monster stereotype that literature and film have created are not as narrow as once thought. The desire for love can exist even in a non-human species, and love does not limit itself based on appearances or classifications. Victor Frankenstein, however, denies the monster a lover, believing that a race of monsters would spur from a second creation. The creature never indicates that he would terrorize the world if given a counterpart, and in fact would leave human society to spend him with his significant other (205). The monster’s hopes are benign, and Victor Frankenstein distorts and mystifies the monster’s intentions. Clearly, the monster in Frankenstein does not define itself through a series of checklists about “how to be a monster,” but rather breaks the boundaries of traditional monstrosities. This monster does not parade through the town trying to terrorize the people that it encounters; this…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the beginning of her life Aileen Wuornos did not stand a chance. Born the 29th of February 1956 in Rochester, Michigan and named Aileen Carol Pittman and her background with her family would lay all the groundwork for instability in her life and would eventually make her one of if not the most notorious serial killer of modern age. In this paper we are going to cover the life of Aileen Wuornos and how she became known as “Monster”.…

    • 4102 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year 1996 in The town of Port Arthur in Tasmania, Australia, A 28 year old man named Martin Bryant started a killing spree. The massacre ended with the death of 35 men, women, and children, and 18 more severely wounded. Society is easy to blame at first glance, though there are always more complex issues at play. Martin Bryant was born into a fairly good family, unfortunately their parenting style soon became a struggle of trying to force Martin to be “normal”. Martin Bryant is proof that Society did not cause Frankenstein's creature to become a monster, it was his lack of an upbringing that caused him to kill.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The parallel concept of humanity is highlighted through different paradigms. Shelley employs the mise-en-abyme and gothic horror form to highlight how monstrosity (and ultimately humanity) is not defined by the physical, whilst Scott emphasises this in BR through the crime fiction elements which focus on the grey areas of humanity through the simulacra replicants. The physical monstrosity of the creature is juxtaposed with the internal monstrosity of F through the combined mise-en-abyme and gothic form of the novel. The dark and gothic imagery employed to describe the monster in F’s perspective: “his yellow skin... watery eyes… shrivelled complexion and straight black lips” repulses the audience. However, through the mise-en-abyme form, readers are able to empathise with the monster’s pain: “I was a poor, miserable wretch”. Consequently, F’s humanity is questioned as Shelley delves deeper into the monster’s character, to the extent that F becomes the real monster even though he is not physically monstrous. This paralleled theme is further enhanced in BR through the ambiguity of the crime fiction form. This is shown through the simulacrum nature of the replicants and is juxtaposed to the monstrosity in F, as there is no now physical distinction of humanity. This “More human than human” approach is highlighted not just physically, but also…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley presents a powerful depiction of monstrous nature that is perceived to us through the use of: nature, context, contrast, perception, imagery and language in the novel. Through these devices and means, a bleak outlook of humanity as a whole is portrayed.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Murder is an act that is hated by all cultures, including the culture Mary Shelley lived in when she wrote Frankenstein. However, Shelley frames the violence the monster commits in a way that allows the reader to sympathize with the monster. This monster murders three people and causes the death of three others, but the reader retains sympathy for this monster due to Victor Frankenstein’s fault in the matter, his isolation due to society’s prejudice, and the fact that he begins his life inherently innocent, and repeatedly shows that he’s not just bad, but there’s also a good side to him.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book “Frankenstein” by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley discusses Victor Frankenstein's life before the creation and after. The monster wasn’t made for mass destruction but godful life. Seeking revenge for rejection from mankind, the creature creates loneliness in Victor’s life. The question “Is man born evil or is evil created in man by society” is answered in the book because the creature wasn’t born evil. Over the years he grew a dark side because of no guidance, rejection, failure, and jealousy.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    frankenstein

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The pursuit of knowledge is at the heart of Frankenstein, as Victor attempts to surge beyond accepted human limits and access the secret of life. Likewise, Robert Walton attempts to surpass previous human explorations by endeavoring to reach the North Pole. This ruthless pursuit of knowledge, of the light (see “Light and Fire”), proves dangerous, as Victor’s act of creation eventually results in the destruction of everyone dear to him, and Walton finds himself perilously trapped between sheets of ice. Whereas Victor’s obsessive hatred of the monster drives him to his death, Walton ultimately pulls back from his treacherous mission, having learned from Victor’s example how destructive the thirst for knowledge can be.Monstrosity…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelly tells the story of an obsessive scientist who pursues to defy nature and create unnatural life. Victor Frankenstein attends a university where he is introduced to natural philosophy and soon after becomes consumed with a project replacing all ties to the outside world and those closest to him. When Frankenstein succeeds in bringing life to an inanimate body he is set back immediately by the botched creation he has made. Without a word from the creature, Frankenstein throws a tantrum and ultimately abandons the brand new life he started. As the creature struggles on the search for love and compassion, he encounters continuous rejection because of his distorted appearance and is driven further into isolation…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gothic literature can objectively be boiled down to a series of commonalities that are prevalent in some way, shape or form throughout the figureheads of the genre. Themes tying monstrosity to that of bodily deformity, duplicity, desire and degeneracy are deeply rooted in the genres subtext raising many questions regarding humanity as opposed to the humanities. This view is in part, a product of the Victorian era in which this genre thrived. At the time, much study was being conducted in regards to the possible connection between physical appearance and criminality. This created an unnecessary link between the perceived atavistic properties of an individual and the probability of them housing a malicious nature. These perceptions are only further embellished…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monsters are imaginary creatures that humans created. People’s fears, worries, or anxieties have been used to create the fictional monsters. Monsters have features that society deem to be scary or bad. The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and the novella The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka follow the story of a 'monster'. Pushed away from society, and labeled as an outcast, the monster is often hurt by the people around it. However, the monsters in these stories were not always monsters. They were once simple creatures, loving and kind, who were pushed away by society, turned into outcasts and deemed unfit to live among the rest of society. Once deemed unfit for society, both Frankenstein's monster and Gregor turned towards monstrosity. Both…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No longer were monsters a product of supernatural forces, monsters were created. Yet, in order for a monster to become a monster, it cannot exist in isolation. Relating my idea of the connection between knowledge and morality in the Scientific Revolution/Enlightenment period to the monster and his body in Frankenstein, I argue that society’s knowledge of the monster is formed in one of two ways; one, through scientific creation or two, through social construction. Now, it is through (1) physical features which differ drastically from others or (2) immoral actions that one becomes a monster in their own society. In part, “monsters” are products of their own environment. What makes the creature in Frankenstein a monster is that he is both a scientific creation and his physical features and his actions of murder deviate from society’s expectations. Throughout the novel Frankenstein’s creation is never given a real name. Instead, he is called; a “demoniacal corpse, wretch, daemon, devil, monster, ogre, the being and creature” (36, 68, 102, 164, 165). Besides not having a name, Frankenstein’s creature is also described using the term deformity and monster. After society’s constant negative response to his physical appearance, the creature himself…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Destiny was too potent, and her immutable laws had decreed my utter and terrible destruction” is the monster’s destiny to be evil? Mary Shelley wrote “Frankenstien” which she later published in 1818. The novel was based on a crazy scientist who saw lighting strike before his eyes. This gave him an idea that he can bring someone back to life. He spent many years creating this creature! Later after creating this creature he abandeed him causing the monster to seek revenenge. The monster did this by killin of victor’s family. could society and abandoment cause the monster to act out ? does society play an important role in the monster life? Is the monster heart broken or just looking for love? Does society make you evil or are you just born evil?…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Victor Frankenstein's repudiate for the monster and the civilians reject are the outside elements that concludes in the monster becoming _______ Furthermore, while Frankenstein and his monster were conversing he reveals, “You, my creator, abhor me. Your fellow creatures spurn and hate me” (55). Frankenstein’s monster shunning and persecution resulted in him changing his personality and retaliating because, he could no longer hold his emotions within. Furthermore, his great feelings of vengeance for the society left the monster to kill and destroy. In addition, the overwhelming environmental influences of hate compels the monster to “be no more [so I] shall no longer feel the agonies which now consume me (127). Being neglected by his creator…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays